Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1283-1289. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4034.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 authorizes Medicare to negotiate prices of top-selling drugs based on several factors, including therapeutic benefit compared with existing treatment options.
To determine the added therapeutic benefit of the 50 top-selling brand-name drugs in Medicare in 2020, as assessed by health technology assessment (HTA) organizations in Canada, France, and Germany.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, publicly available therapeutic benefit ratings, US Food and Drug Administration documents, and the Medicare Part B and Part D prescription drug spending dashboards were used to determine the 50 top-selling single-source drugs used in Medicare in 2020 and to assess their added therapeutic benefit ratings through 2021.
Ratings from HTA bodies in Canada, France, and Germany were categorized as high (moderate or greater) or low (minor or no) added benefit. Each drug was rated based on its most favorable rating across countries, indications, subpopulations, and dosage forms. We compared the use and prerebate and postrebate (ie, net) Medicare spending between drugs with high vs low added benefit.
Forty-nine drugs (98%) received an HTA rating by at least 1 country; 22 of 36 drugs (61%) received a low added benefit rating in Canada, 34 of 47 in France (72%), and 17 of 29 in Germany (59%). Across countries, 27 drugs (55%) had a low added therapeutic rating, accounting for $19.3 billion in annual estimated net spending, or 35% of Medicare net spending on the 50 top-selling single-source drugs and 11% of total Medicare net prescription drug spending in 2020. Compared with those with high added benefit, drugs with a low added therapeutic rating were used by more Medicare beneficiaries (median 387 149 vs 44 869) and had lower net spending per beneficiary (median $992 vs $32 287).
Many top-selling Medicare drugs received low added benefit ratings by the national HTA organizations of Canada, France, and Germany. When negotiating prices for these drugs, Medicare should ensure they are not priced higher than reasonable therapeutic alternatives.
2022 年的《降低通胀法案》授权医疗保险根据多种因素(包括与现有治疗方案相比的治疗效益)对畅销药品进行价格谈判。
确定 2020 年医疗保险中 50 种最畅销的品牌药物的额外治疗效益,由加拿大、法国和德国的健康技术评估(HTA)组织进行评估。
设计、设置和参与者:在这项横断面研究中,使用公开的治疗效益评级、美国食品和药物管理局文件以及医疗保险 B 部分和 D 部分处方药支出仪表板,确定 2020 年医疗保险中使用的 50 种最畅销的单一来源药物,并通过 2021 年评估其额外治疗效益评级。
加拿大、法国和德国的 HTA 机构的评级分为高(中度或更高)或低(轻度或无)附加效益。每种药物都根据其在各国、适应症、亚人群和剂型中的最佳评级进行评级。我们比较了高附加效益和低附加效益药物的使用情况以及预折扣和后折扣(即净)医疗保险支出。
49 种(98%)药物至少获得 1 个国家的 HTA 评级;36 种药物中有 22 种(61%)在加拿大获得低附加效益评级,47 种药物中有 34 种(72%)在法国,29 种药物中有 17 种(59%)在德国。在所有国家中,27 种(55%)药物的治疗效益评级较低,估计每年有 193 亿美元的净支出,占医疗保险 50 种最畅销单一来源药物净支出的 35%和 2020 年医疗保险总净处方药支出的 11%。与高附加效益药物相比,低附加治疗效益药物的使用人群更多(中位数 387149 人比 44869 人),每位受益人的净支出也更低(中位数 992 美元比 32287 美元)。
加拿大、法国和德国的国家 HTA 组织对许多畅销的医疗保险药物的附加效益评级较低。在对这些药物进行价格谈判时,医疗保险应确保这些药物的价格不高于合理的治疗替代药物。