文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡农村社区中 COBRA-BPS 多组分高血压管理方案的预算影响和成本效益分析。

Budget impact and cost-effectiveness analyses of the COBRA-BPS multicomponent hypertension management programme in rural communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

机构信息

Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e660-e667. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00033-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.


DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00033-4
PMID:33751956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8050199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: COBRA-BPS (Control of Blood Pressure and Risk Attenuation-Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka), a multi-component hypertension management programme that is led by community health workers, has been shown to be efficacious at reducing systolic blood pressure in rural communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. In this study, we aimed to assess the budget required to scale up the programme and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. METHODS: In a cluster-randomised trial of COBRA-BPS, individuals aged 40 years or older with hypertension who lived in 30 rural communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka were deemed eligible for inclusion. Costs were quantified prospectively at baseline and during 2 years of the trial. All costs, including labour, rental, materials and supplies, and contracted services were recorded, stratified by programme activity. Incremental costs of scaling up COBRA-BPS to all eligible adults in areas covered by community health workers were estimated from the health ministry (public payer) perspective. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2016, and Feb 28, 2017, 11 510 individuals were screened and 2645 were enrolled and included in the study. Participants were examined between May 8, 2016, and March 31, 2019. The first-year per-participant costs for COBRA-BPS were US$10·65 for Bangladesh, $10·25 for Pakistan, and $6·42 for Sri Lanka. Per-capita costs were $0·63 for Bangladesh, $0·29 for Pakistan, and $1·03 for Sri Lanka. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $3430 for Bangladesh, $2270 for Pakistan, and $4080 for Sri Lanka, per cardiovascular disability-adjusted life year averted, which showed COBRA-BPS to be cost-effective in all three countries relative to the WHO-CHOICE threshold of three times gross domestic product per capita in each country. Using this threshold, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curves predicted that the probability of COBRA-BPS being cost-effective is 79·3% in Bangladesh, 85·2% in Pakistan, and 99·8% in Sri Lanka. INTERPRETATION: The low cost of scale-up and the cost-effectiveness of COBRA-BPS suggest that this programme is a viable strategy for responding to the growing cardiovascular disease epidemic in rural communities in low-income and middle-income countries where community health workers are present, and that it should qualify as a priority intervention across rural settings in south Asia and in other countries with similar demographics and health systems to those examined in this study. FUNDING: The UK Department of Health and Social Care, the UK Department for International Development, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust.

摘要

背景:COBRA-BPS(孟加拉国、巴基斯坦、斯里兰卡的血压控制和风险降低计划)是一项多组分高血压管理项目,由社区卫生工作者主导,已被证明能有效降低孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡农村社区的收缩压。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估扩大该项目所需的预算和增量成本效益比。

方法:在 COBRA-BPS 的一项群组随机试验中,年龄在 40 岁及以上、患有高血压、居住在孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡 30 个农村社区的个体被认为有资格入组。在基线和试验的 2 年期间,前瞻性地量化了成本。所有成本,包括劳动力、租金、材料和用品以及签约服务,均按项目活动进行分层记录。从卫生部(公共支付方)的角度估计了将 COBRA-BPS 扩大到社区卫生工作者覆盖地区所有符合条件的成年人的增量成本。

结果:2016 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 2 月 28 日,对 11510 人进行了筛查,有 2645 人入组并纳入研究。参与者于 2016 年 5 月 8 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日接受检查。COBRA-BPS 的第一年每位参与者的成本为孟加拉国 10.65 美元,巴基斯坦 10.25 美元,斯里兰卡 6.42 美元。人均成本为孟加拉国 0.63 美元,巴基斯坦 0.29 美元,斯里兰卡 1.03 美元。孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡的每避免一个心血管残疾调整生命年的增量成本效益比分别为 3430 美元、2270 美元和 4080 美元,表明 COBRA-BPS 在这三个国家相对于每个国家世卫组织 CHOICE 阈值(人均国内生产总值的三倍)都是具有成本效益的。使用该阈值,成本效益可接受性曲线预测 COBRA-BPS 在孟加拉国的成本效益概率为 79.3%,在巴基斯坦为 85.2%,在斯里兰卡为 99.8%。

解释:COBRA-BPS 的低扩展成本和成本效益表明,对于在存在社区卫生工作者的低收入和中等收入国家的农村社区中日益严重的心血管疾病流行,该方案是一种可行的应对策略,并且应该符合南亚农村地区和其他具有类似人口统计学和卫生系统的国家的优先干预措施,这些国家都在本研究的审查范围内。

资金来源:英国卫生部和社会保健部、英国国际发展部、全球挑战研究基金、英国医学研究理事会、惠康信托基金会。

相似文献

[1]
Budget impact and cost-effectiveness analyses of the COBRA-BPS multicomponent hypertension management programme in rural communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

Lancet Glob Health. 2021-5

[2]
Post-intervention acceptability of multicomponent intervention for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka- a qualitative study.

PLoS One. 2023

[3]
Multicomponent intervention versus usual care for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2017-6-12

[4]
Statistical analysis plan for the control of blood pressure and risk attenuation-rural Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka (COBRA-BPS) trial: a cluster randomized trial for a multicomponent intervention versus usual care in hypertensive patients.

Trials. 2018-11-29

[5]
Regional variation in chronic kidney disease and associated factors in hypertensive individuals in rural South Asia: findings from control of blood pressure and risk attenuation-Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019-10-1

[6]
Control of blood pressure and risk attenuation: a public health intervention in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka: feasibility trial results.

J Hypertens. 2016-9

[7]
A Community-Based Intervention for Managing Hypertension in Rural South Asia.

N Engl J Med. 2020-2-20

[8]
Determinants of Uncontrolled Hypertension in Rural Communities in South Asia-Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

Am J Hypertens. 2018-10-15

[9]
Regional Variation in Comorbid Prediabetes and Diabetes and Associated Factors among Hypertensive Individuals in Rural Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

J Obes. 2019-4-30

[10]
Prevalence and correlates of cardiometabolic multimorbidity among hypertensive individuals: a cross-sectional study in rural South Asia-Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

BMJ Open. 2019-9-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Community Health Worker Optimization of Antihypertensive Care in HIV (COACH): Study protocol for a pilot trial of an intervention to improve hypertension care among Tanzanians with HIV.

PLoS One. 2024-12-17

[2]
Cost-effectiveness of group medical visits and microfinance interventions versus usual care to manage hypertension in Kenya: a secondary modelling analysis of data from the Bridging Income Generation with Group Integrated Care (BIGPIC) trial.

Lancet Glob Health. 2024-8

[3]
Integrating a Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to improve care of patients with hypertension: a longitudinal observational study protocol.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-4-27

[4]
The burden of diseases and risk factors in Bangladesh, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Lancet Glob Health. 2023-12

[5]
An economic evaluation of a primary care-based technology-enabled intervention for stroke secondary prevention and management in rural China: a study protocol.

Front Neurol. 2023-5-2

[6]
High impact health service interventions for attainment of UHC in Africa: A systematic review.

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022-9-23

[7]
Global and Rural Health Disparities.

Ethn Dis. 2022-10-20

[8]
Addressing global disparities in blood pressure control: perspectives of the International Society of Hypertension.

Cardiovasc Res. 2023-3-31

[9]
High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: Current Perspectives and Strategies to Improve Future Kidney and Cardiovascular Health.

Kidney Int Rep. 2022-3-1

[10]
Approaches and outcomes of community health worker's interventions for hypertension management and control in low-income and middle-income countries: systematic review.

BMJ Open. 2022-4-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
The cost-effectiveness of hypertension management in low-income and middle-income countries: a review.

BMJ Glob Health. 2020-9

[2]
A Community-Based Intervention for Managing Hypertension in Rural South Asia.

N Engl J Med. 2020-2-20

[3]
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the community-based management of hypertension in Nepal study (COBIN): a retrospective analysis.

Lancet Glob Health. 2019-10

[4]
Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study.

Lancet. 2019-9-3

[5]
Cardiovascular risk factor reduction by community health workers in rural India: A cluster randomized trial.

Am Heart J. 2019-6-19

[6]
Patients' experiences on accessing health care services for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka: A qualitative study.

PLoS One. 2019-1-25

[7]
Cost-Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Approach for Hypertension Control in Low-Income Settings in Argentina: Trial-Based Analysis of the Hypertension Control Program in Argentina.

Value Health. 2018-8-30

[8]
Prevalence and incidence of hypertension: Results from a representative cohort of over 16,000 adults in three cities of South Asia.

Indian Heart J. 2017

[9]
Community health workers for non-communicable diseases prevention and control in developing countries: Evidence and implications.

PLoS One. 2017-7-13

[10]
Multicomponent intervention versus usual care for management of hypertension in rural Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2017-6-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索