College of Health Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e053455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053455.
To critically appraise the scope, content and outcomes of community health worker (CHW) interventions designed to reduce blood pressure (BP) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).
We performed a database search (PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, Cochrane Central Trials Register and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) to identify studies in LMICs from 2000 to 2020. Eligible studies were interventional studies published in English and reporting CHW interventions for management of BP in LMICs. Two independent reviewers screened the titles, abstracts and full texts of publications for eligibility and inclusion. Relevant information was extracted from these studies using a tailored template. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool. Qualitative synthesis of results was done through general summary of the characteristics and findings of each study. We also analysed the patterns of interventions and their outcomes across the studies. Results were presented in form of narrative and tables.
Of the 1557 articles identified, 14 met the predefined criteria. Of these, 12 were cluster randomised trials whereas two were pretest/post-test studies. The CHW interventions were mainly community-based and focused on behaviour change for promoting BP control among hypertensive patients as well as healthy individuals. The interventions had positive effects in the BP reduction, linkage to care, treatment adherence and in reducing cardivascular-disease risk level.
The current review is limited in that, a meta-analysis to show the overall effect of CHW interventions in the management of hypertension was not possible due to the diversity of the interventions, and outcomes of the studies included in the review. Summarised outcomes of individual studies showed CHW enhanced the control and management of hypertension. Further studies are needed to indicate the impact and cost-effectiveness of CHW-led interventions in the control and management of hypertension in LMICs.
批判性地评价旨在降低低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)血压的社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施的范围、内容和结果。
我们在数据库(PUBMED、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、OpenGrey、Cochrane 中心试验注册和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库)中进行了检索,以确定 2000 年至 2020 年期间在 LMICs 开展的研究。符合条件的研究是发表在英文期刊上的干预性研究,报告了在 LMICs 中使用 CHW 干预措施管理血压的情况。两名独立评审员对出版物的标题、摘要和全文进行了筛选,以确定其是否符合入选标准。使用定制模板从这些研究中提取相关信息。使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具评估偏倚风险。通过对每项研究的特征和发现进行综合总结,对结果进行定性综合分析。我们还分析了研究之间干预措施及其结果的模式。结果以叙述和表格的形式呈现。
在确定的 1557 篇文章中,有 14 篇符合预先设定的标准。其中 12 篇为整群随机对照试验,2 篇为预测试/后测试研究。CHW 干预措施主要以社区为基础,重点是通过行为改变来促进高血压患者和健康人群的血压控制。这些干预措施在降低血压、与医疗保健机构建立联系、提高治疗依从性以及降低心血管疾病风险水平方面都有积极的效果。
本综述受到一定限制,由于所纳入研究中的干预措施和结局存在多样性,因此无法进行 meta 分析以展示 CHW 干预措施在高血压管理中的总体效果。对个别研究的总结结果表明,CHW 增强了高血压的控制和管理。需要进一步的研究来表明 CHW 主导的干预措施在控制和管理 LMICs 中的高血压方面的影响和成本效益。