Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10563-9.
In Germany, a mandatory policy on measles vaccination came into effect in March 2020. Physicians, as the main vaccine providers, have a crucial role in implementing it. Mandatory vaccination changes the preconditions under which patient-provider communication on vaccines occurs. Physicians might or might not favor vaccine mandates depending on, among other factors, their attitudes towards vaccines and capabilities as vaccine providers. The aim of this study was to investigate in different subgroups of physicians the association between various factors and their attitudes towards a mandatory policy.
In total, 2229 physicians participated in a mixed-mode online/paper-pencil survey. Respondents were general practitioners, pediatricians, gynecologists, and internists. Primary determinants were the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination, communication self-efficacy, patient clientele, projected consequences of the mandate and sociodemographic characteristics. Associations between outcomes and determinants were examined using linear regression analysis.
Approximately 86% of physicians were in favor of the measles vaccine mandate for children. Regarding the 5C model, physicians were more in favor of vaccine mandates when they scored higher on confidence and collective responsibility, and lower on complacency and calculation. They were more in favor of vaccine mandates when they had higher communication self-efficacy and a more vaccine-positive patient clientele. Pediatricians were less in favor of mandates for children (80.0%) than other physician subgroups (87.1%). They were also less convinced that a mandate would result in more children getting vaccinated (59.3%) than other physician subgroups (78.3%). When controlled for these expected consequences, being a pediatrician no longer lowered the attitude towards the mandate.
Physicians in Germany are predominantly in favor of a measles vaccine mandate. Whether or not physicians believe the mandate to be effective in increasing vaccine coverage affects their attitude towards the mandate. In pediatricians, this belief explains their less positive attitude towards the mandate. In addition, physicians need adequate support to communicate well with patients, especially those who are hesitant, to booster their communication self-efficacy. To increase acceptance of vaccine mandates, the 5C model can be used, e.g., collective responsibility can be communicated, to avoid anger stemming from a negative attitude to mandates.
德国于 2020 年 3 月实施了强制性麻疹疫苗接种政策。作为主要疫苗提供者的医生在实施该政策方面发挥着至关重要的作用。强制性疫苗接种改变了医患之间就疫苗接种进行沟通的前提条件。医生可能会或可能不会赞成疫苗强制接种,这取决于他们对疫苗的态度以及作为疫苗提供者的能力等因素。本研究旨在调查不同医生亚组中,各种因素与他们对强制政策的态度之间的关联。
共有 2229 名医生参加了混合模式的在线/纸质问卷调查。受访者为全科医生、儿科医生、妇科医生和内科医生。主要决定因素是疫苗接种的 5C 心理前因、沟通自我效能、患者客户群、授权的预期后果以及社会人口学特征。使用线性回归分析检查结果与决定因素之间的关联。
大约 86%的医生赞成为儿童接种麻疹疫苗强制接种。关于 5C 模型,当医生对信心和集体责任感评分较高,对自满和计算评分较低时,他们更赞成疫苗接种强制接种。当他们的沟通自我效能更高,疫苗接种的患者客户群更多时,他们更赞成疫苗接种强制接种。儿科医生比其他医生亚组(87.1%)更不赞成为儿童接种疫苗强制接种(80.0%)。他们也不相信授权会导致更多儿童接种疫苗(59.3%),而其他医生亚组(78.3%)则认为会如此。当控制这些预期后果时,儿科医生对授权的态度不再降低。
德国医生普遍赞成麻疹疫苗接种强制接种。医生是否认为授权在增加疫苗接种率方面有效会影响他们对授权的态度。在儿科医生中,这种信念解释了他们对授权的态度不太积极。此外,医生需要得到充分的支持,以便与患者进行良好的沟通,特别是那些犹豫不决的患者,以增强他们的沟通自我效能。为了提高对疫苗强制接种的接受度,可以使用 5C 模型,例如,可以传达集体责任感,以避免对授权的负面态度引发的愤怒。