JSI. 2733 Crystal Drive, 4th floor, Arlington, VA, USA.
UNICEF/Supply Division, UN City, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 15;39(16):2246-2254. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
Immunization supply chains (iSC) are essential for ensuring access to vaccines that prevent diseases. Guinea, Madagascar, and Niger initiated iSC system design efforts to conduct analysis of alternative supply chain scenarios to identify areas for improvement.
Key stakeholders from Ministries of Health and immunization programs identified bottlenecks in the current iSC and prioritized five general design scenarios to model in each country. Scenarios included aspects of integration, changing supply chain levels and delivery frequency, ignoring administrative boundaries, and direct delivery. Primary and secondary data were collected and cleaned. Analysis was completed using Supply Chain Guru (Madagascar and Niger) and AnyLogistix (Guinea) modeling software to build a virtual representation of the iSC physical components and operating policies.
Modeling results were compared using both quantitative and qualitative criteria (total operating costs, cost per dose, cold chain capacity, risk of mishandling, logistics burden on healthcare workers, feasibility to implement, and equity). Using a Stop Light Analysis for user-friendly understanding of positive, negative or minimal impact on scenarios, cost savings were realized in most scenarios in Madagascar (except using autonomous aerial vehicles); proposed scenarios in Guinea increased costs or had minimal impact; in Niger, eliminating regional tiers reduced costs. Facility level cold chain was sufficient in all countries. Effect on qualitative indicators largely depended on the scenario and country context.
Similarities in scenarios selected were seen across the three countries. Results suggest that efficiencies can be found through changes to the iSC design, but the benefits of each scenario must be considered in the country context. Results of the analysis do not provide "the right answer" but rather options and guidance which then must be grounded in the country context and used as evidence for decision making to ensure reliable availability of vaccines.
免疫供应链(iSC)对于确保获得预防疾病的疫苗至关重要。几内亚、马达加斯加和尼日尔启动了 iSC 系统设计工作,以分析替代供应链方案,确定改进领域。
来自卫生部和免疫规划的主要利益攸关方确定了当前 iSC 的瓶颈,并为每个国家确定了五个一般设计方案进行建模。方案包括整合方面、改变供应链级别和交付频率、忽略行政边界和直接交付。收集和清理了主要和次要数据。使用 Supply Chain Guru(马达加斯加和尼日尔)和 AnyLogistix(几内亚)建模软件完成分析,以建立 iSC 物理组件和操作政策的虚拟表示。
使用定量和定性标准(总运营成本、每剂量成本、冷链容量、处理不当风险、医护人员物流负担、实施可行性和公平性)比较建模结果。使用信号灯分析便于用户理解对方案的积极、消极或最小影响,在马达加斯加的大多数方案中实现了成本节约(除了使用自主空中车辆);在几内亚提出的方案增加了成本或影响最小;在尼日尔,消除区域层级降低了成本。在所有国家,设施级冷链都充足。定性指标的影响在很大程度上取决于方案和国家背景。
在三个国家中都看到了选择方案的相似之处。结果表明,可以通过改变 iSC 设计找到效率,但必须在国家背景下考虑每个方案的效益。分析结果并没有提供“正确答案”,而是提供了选择和指导,然后必须立足于国家背景,并将其用作决策的证据,以确保疫苗的可靠供应。