• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国隐性化石燃料补贴对生产者的好处。

The producer benefits of implicit fossil fuel subsidies in the United States.

机构信息

School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;

National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011969118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2011969118
PMID:33753554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8018594/
Abstract

This paper estimates the financial benefits accruing to fossil fuel producers (i.e., the producer incidence) that arise because of implicit fossil fuel subsidies in the United States. The analysis takes account of coal, natural gas, gasoline, and diesel, along with the implicit subsidies due to externalized environmental damages, public health effects, and transportation-related costs. The direct benefit to fossil fuel producers across all four fuels is estimated at $62 billion per year, a sum calculated due to the higher price that suppliers receive because of inefficient pricing compared to the counterfactual scenario where environmental and public health externalities are internalized. A significant portion of these benefits accrue to relatively few companies, and specific estimates are provided for companies with the largest production. The financial benefit because of unpriced costs borne by society is comparable to 18% of net income from continuing domestic operations for the median natural gas and oil producer in 2017-2018, and it exceeds net income for the majority of coal producers. The results clarify what the domestic fossil fuel industry has at stake financially when it comes to policies that seek to address climate change, adverse health effects from local pollution, and inefficient transportation.

摘要

本文估计了美国隐含化石燃料补贴给化石燃料生产商(即生产者负担)带来的经济利益。该分析考虑了煤炭、天然气、汽油和柴油,以及由于外部化的环境损害、公共卫生影响和与交通相关的成本而产生的隐含补贴。由于与将环境和公共健康外部性内部化的情况相比,供应商因定价效率低下而获得的更高价格,所有四种燃料的化石燃料生产商的直接收益估计为每年 620 亿美元。这些收益的很大一部分归属于相对较少的公司,并且为产量最大的公司提供了具体估计。由于社会承担的无定价成本而产生的财务收益与 2017-2018 年天然气和石油生产商中位数国内持续经营净利润的 18%相当,超过了大多数煤炭生产商的净利润。研究结果阐明了国内化石燃料行业在应对气候变化、当地污染对健康的不利影响以及低效交通等政策方面在财务上的利害关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a1968ff5ab5d/pnas.2011969118fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/0b4ddcfe88e5/pnas.2011969118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a6e2829f453c/pnas.2011969118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a25d30592225/pnas.2011969118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/d4f4ae3cbf87/pnas.2011969118fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/d668a9de542e/pnas.2011969118fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a1968ff5ab5d/pnas.2011969118fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/0b4ddcfe88e5/pnas.2011969118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a6e2829f453c/pnas.2011969118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a25d30592225/pnas.2011969118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/d4f4ae3cbf87/pnas.2011969118fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/d668a9de542e/pnas.2011969118fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd1e/8018594/a1968ff5ab5d/pnas.2011969118fig06.jpg

相似文献

1
The producer benefits of implicit fossil fuel subsidies in the United States.美国隐性化石燃料补贴对生产者的好处。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011969118.
2
Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts.美国化石燃料发电对健康影响的经济价值。
Environ Int. 2013 Feb;52:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions.除非在能源出口地区,否则减少燃料补贴的排放有限。
Nature. 2018 Feb 7;554(7691):229-233. doi: 10.1038/nature25467.
4
Prioritize carbon pricing over fossil-fuel subsidy reform.将碳定价置于化石燃料补贴改革之上。
iScience. 2023 Nov 25;27(1):108584. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108584. eCollection 2024 Jan 19.
5
Household Energy Interventions and Health and Finances in Haryana, India: An Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis印度哈里亚纳邦的家庭能源干预措施与健康和财务状况:一项扩展的成本效益分析
6
Political leadership has limited impact on fossil fuel taxes and subsidies.政治领导力对化石燃料税和补贴的影响有限。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2208024119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208024119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
7
Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses.海洋应用的生物燃料选择:技术经济和生命周期分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 1;55(11):7561-7570. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06141. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Comparative analysis of the production costs and life-cycle GHG emissions of FT liquid fuels from coal and natural gas.煤炭和天然气制费托合成液体燃料的生产成本与生命周期温室气体排放的对比分析
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Oct 15;42(20):7559-65. doi: 10.1021/es8002074.
9
The legacy of fossil fuels.化石燃料的遗留问题。
Chem Asian J. 2011 Mar 1;6(3):768-84. doi: 10.1002/asia.201000797. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
10
A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels.替代汽车燃料的生命周期比较。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Oct;50(10):1769-79.

引用本文的文献

1
How Can We Act to Mitigate the Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change?我们应当如何行动,以缓解肥胖、营养不足与气候变化三重全球危机?
Curr Obes Rep. 2022 Sep;11(3):61-69. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00464-8.