Division of Cardiology NewYork Presbyterian-Columbia University Medical Center New York NY.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York NY.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e019584. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019584. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
Background The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in intermediate surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo either transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not well established. Methods and Results Data were assessed in 2663 patients from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) 2A or S3i trials. Analyses grouped patients into 3 categories according to their baseline and discharge rhythms (ie, sinus rhythm [SR]/SR, SR/AF, or AF/AF). Among patients with transcatheter AVR (n=1867), 79.2% had SR/SR, 17.6% had AF/AF, and 3.2% had SR/AF. Among patients with surgical AVR (n=796), 71.7% had SR/SR, 14.1% had AF/AF, and 14.2% had SR/AF. Patients with transcatheter AVR in AF at discharge had increased 2-year mortality (SR/AF versus SR/SR; hazard ratio [HR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.68-4.44; <0.0001; AF/AF versus SR/SR; HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.16-2.09; =0.003); patients with SR/AF also experienced increased 2-year mortality relative to patients with AF/AF (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.04-3.00; =0.03). For patients with surgicalAVR, the presence of AF at discharge was also associated with increased 2-year mortality (SR/AF versus SR/SR; HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.25-2.96; =0.002; and AF/AF versus SR/SR; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.06-2.63; =0.027). Rehospitalization and persistent advanced heart failure symptoms were also more common among patients with transcatheter AVR and surgical AVR discharged in AF, and major bleeding was more common in the transcatheter AVR cohort. Conclusions The presence of AF at discharge in patients with intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis was associated with worse outcomes-especially in patients with baseline SR-including increased all-cause mortality at 2-year follow-up. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01314313 and NCT03222128.
背景 对于接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的中危手术风险严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,心房颤动(AF)的影响尚不清楚。
方法和结果 对来自 PARTNER(经导管主动脉瓣置换术)2A 或 S3i 试验的 2663 例患者的数据进行了评估。分析根据患者的基线和出院节律将患者分为 3 类(即窦性节律[SR]/SR、SR/AF 或 AF/AF)。在接受经导管 AVR(n=1867)的患者中,79.2%为 SR/SR,17.6%为 AF/AF,3.2%为 SR/AF。在接受外科 AVR(n=796)的患者中,71.7%为 SR/SR,14.1%为 AF/AF,14.2%为 SR/AF。出院时处于 AF 节律的经导管 AVR 患者 2 年死亡率增加(SR/AF 与 SR/SR;风险比[HR],2.73;95%置信区间[CI],1.68-4.44;<0.0001;AF/AF 与 SR/SR;HR,1.56;95%CI,1.16-2.09;=0.003);存在 SR/AF 的患者 2 年死亡率也高于存在 AF/AF 的患者(HR,1.77;95%CI,1.04-3.00;=0.03)。对于接受外科 AVR 的患者,出院时存在 AF 也与 2 年死亡率增加相关(SR/AF 与 SR/SR;HR,1.93;95%CI,1.25-2.96;=0.002;和 AF/AF 与 SR/SR;HR,1.67;95%CI,1.06-2.63;=0.027)。接受经导管 AVR 和外科 AVR 的患者出院时处于 AF 节律时,再住院和持续性晚期心力衰竭症状也更为常见,而经导管 AVR 组的大出血更为常见。
结论 中危手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者出院时存在 AF 与预后较差相关,尤其是在基线时存在 SR 的患者,包括 2 年随访时全因死亡率增加。
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01314313 和 NCT03222128。