Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2021 Jul 3;84(13):553-567. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2021.1901251. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
The 2018 ATSDR mixture framework recommends three approaches including the hazard index (HI) for environmental mixture toxicity assessment. Per- and polyfluoroalkyls (PFAS) are found in our environment and general populations. Recent experimental mixture toxicity studies of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and an assessment of 17 PFAS indicate the use of additivity for their joint toxicity assessment. The aim of this investigation was to detail the stepwise procedures and examine the extent and use of the HI approach for PFAS mixture assessment. Using estimated general public lifetime exposures (high, medium, and low), binary mixtures of PFOS and PFOA yielded, respectively, hazard indices (HIs) of 30.67, 8.33, and 3.63 for developmental toxicity; 10.67, 5.04, and 2.34 for immunological toxicity; 3.57, 1.68, and 0.78 for endocrine toxicity; 4.51, 1.73, and 0.79 for hepatic toxicity; and 15.08, 2.29, and 0.88 for reproductive toxicity. A heterogeneous mixture of PFOA, PFAS, dioxin (CDD), and polybrominated compounds (PBDE) for high exposure scenario yielded HIs of 30.99 for developmental, 10.77 for immunological, 3.64 for endocrine, 4.61 for hepatic, and 17.36 for reproductive effects. The HI values are used as a screening tool; the potential concern for exposures rises as HI values increase. For HI values >1, a follow-up including further analysis of specific exposures, use of internal dosimetry, and uncertainty factors is conducted before recommending appropriate actions. The HI approach appears suitable to address present-day PFAS public health concerns for initial assessment of multiple health effects, until further insights are gained into their mechanistic toxicology.The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
2018 年 ATSDR 混合物框架建议了三种方法,包括环境混合物毒性评估的危害指数 (HI)。全氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 存在于我们的环境和一般人群中。最近对全氟辛烷磺酸 (PFOS) 和全氟辛酸 (PFOA) 的实验混合物毒性研究以及对 17 种 PFAS 的评估表明,可将加和性用于它们的联合毒性评估。本研究的目的是详细介绍逐步程序,并检查 HI 方法在 PFAS 混合物评估中的应用程度。使用估计的普通公众终生暴露量(高、中、低),PFOS 和 PFOA 的二元混合物分别产生了 30.67、8.33 和 3.63 的发育毒性危害指数 (HI);10.67、5.04 和 2.34 的免疫毒性;3.57、1.68 和 0.78 的内分泌毒性;4.51、1.73 和 0.79 的肝毒性;15.08、2.29 和 0.88 的生殖毒性。高暴露情景下的 PFOA、PFAS、二恶英 (CDD) 和多溴化化合物 (PBDE) 的异质混合物产生了 30.99 的发育、10.77 的免疫、3.64 的内分泌、4.61 的肝和 17.36 的生殖效应的 HI 值。HI 值可作为筛选工具;随着 HI 值的增加,暴露的潜在风险增加。对于 HI 值>1,在建议采取适当措施之前,需要进行进一步的特定暴露分析、内部剂量测定和不确定性因素的后续工作。HI 方法似乎适合解决当前 PFAS 对多种健康影响的公共卫生问题,直到对其毒理学机制有了更深入的了解。本文的发现和结论是作者的观点,不一定代表疾病控制和预防中心/有毒物质和疾病登记处的官方立场。