National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Mar;40(3):859-870. doi: 10.1002/etc.4835. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) often occur together as contamination in exposure media such as drinking water or food. The relative potency factor (RPF) methodology facilitates the risk assessment of mixture exposure. A database of liver endpoints was established for 16 PFAS, using data with the same species (rat), sex (male), and exposure route (oral) and comparable exposure duration (42-90 d). Dose-response analysis was applied to derive the relative potencies of 3 perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (perfluorobutane sulfonic acid, perfluorohexane sulfonic acid, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid), 8 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (perfluorobutanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid, perfluorononanoic acid, perfluoroundecanoic acid, perfluorododecanoic acid, perfluorotetradecanoic acid, perfluorohexadecanoic acid, perfluorooctadecanoic acid), 2 perfluoroalkyl ether carboxylic acids (tetrafluoro-2-[heptafluoropropoxy]propanoic acid, 3H-perfluoro-3-[(3-methoxy-propoxy)propanoic acid]), and 2 fluorotelomer alcohols (6:2 FTOH, 8:2 FTOH) compared to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), based on liver effects. In addition, the RPFs of 7 other perfluoroalkyl acids were estimated based on read-across. This resulted in the relative potencies of 22 PFAS compared to the potency of index compound PFOA. The obtained RPFs can be applied to measured PFAS quantities, resulting in the sum of PFOA equivalents in a mixture. This sum can be compared with an established PFOA concentration limit (e.g., in drinking water or food) or an external health-based guidance value (e.g., tolerable daily intake, acceptable daily intake, or reference dose) to estimate the risk resulting from direct oral exposure to mixtures. Assessing mixture exposure is particularly relevant for PFAS, with omnipresent exposure in our daily lives. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:859-870. © 2020 SETAC.
全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 通常作为饮用水或食物等暴露介质中的污染物质共同存在。相对效力因子 (RPF) 方法学有助于混合物暴露的风险评估。使用具有相同物种(大鼠)、性别(雄性)和暴露途径(口服)以及可比暴露持续时间(42-90 d)的数据,为 16 种 PFAS 建立了肝脏终点数据库。对 3 种全氟磺酸(全氟丁烷磺酸、全氟己烷磺酸、全氟辛烷磺酸)、8 种全氟羧酸(全氟丁酸、全氟己酸、全氟壬酸、全氟十一烷酸、全氟十二烷酸、全氟十四烷酸、全氟十六烷酸、全氟十八烷酸)、2 种全氟烷氧基羧酸(四氟-2-[七氟丙氧基]丙酸、3H-全氟-3-[(3-甲氧基丙氧基)丙酸])和 2 种氟调聚物醇(6:2 FTOH、8:2 FTOH)的相对效力进行了剂量-反应分析,以评估其与全氟辛酸 (PFOA) 相比在肝脏效应方面的相对效力。此外,还根据类推法估算了其他 7 种全氟烷基酸的 RPF。这导致与指数化合物 PFOA 相比,22 种 PFAS 的相对效力。获得的 RPF 可应用于测量的 PFAS 量,从而得出混合物中 PFOA 当量的总和。可以将该总和与既定的 PFOA 浓度限值(例如饮用水或食物中的限值)或外部基于健康的指导值(例如可耐受每日摄入量、可接受每日摄入量或参考剂量)进行比较,以估计直接口服接触混合物带来的风险。评估混合物暴露对于 PFAS 特别重要,因为它们在我们的日常生活中无处不在。Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:859-870. © 2020 SETAC.