Suppr超能文献

根据治疗方法评估 COVID-19 预后的病死率和风险特征:一项回顾性队列研究。

Fatality and risk features for prognosis in COVID-19 according to the care approach - a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Alicante General University Hospital, Institute of Sanitary and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 23;16(3):e0248869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248869. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study analyzed the impact of a categorized approach, based on patients' prognosis, on major outcomes and explanators in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia in an academic center in Spain.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study (March 3 to May 2, 2020). Patients were categorized according to the followed clinical management, as maximum care or limited therapeutic effort (LTE). Main outcomes were all-cause mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Baseline factors associated with outcomes were analyzed by multiple logistic regression, estimating odds ratios (OR; 95%CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-hundred and six patients were hospitalized, median age 65.0 years, 57.8% males, 53.3% Charlson index ≥3. The overall all-cause fatality rate was 15.0% (n = 46). Maximum care was provided in 238 (77.8%), IMV was used in 38 patients (16.0%), and 5.5% died. LTE was decided in 68 patients (22.2%), none received IMV and fatality was 48.5%. Independent risk factors of mortality under maximum care were lymphocytes <790/mm3, troponin T >15ng/L and hypotension. Advanced age, lymphocytes <790/mm3 and BNP >240pg/mL independently associated with IMV requirement.

CONCLUSION

Overall fatality in the cohort was 15% but markedly varied regarding the decided approach (maximum care versus LTE), translating into nine-fold higher mortality and different risk factors.

摘要

介绍

本研究分析了一种基于患者预后的分类方法对西班牙一家学术中心因 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者主要结局和解释因素的影响。

方法

回顾性队列研究(2020 年 3 月 3 日至 5 月 2 日)。根据所遵循的临床管理,患者分为最大治疗组或有限治疗组(LTE)。主要结局为全因死亡率和需要有创机械通气(IMV)。通过多因素逻辑回归分析与结局相关的基线因素,估计比值比(OR;95%CI)。

结果

306 例患者住院,中位年龄 65.0 岁,57.8%为男性,53.3%Charlson 指数≥3。总体全因死亡率为 15.0%(n=46)。238 例(77.8%)接受最大治疗,38 例(16.0%)使用 IMV,5.5%死亡。68 例(22.2%)决定 LTE,无一例接受 IMV,死亡率为 48.5%。最大治疗下死亡的独立危险因素是淋巴细胞<790/mm3、肌钙蛋白 T>15ng/L 和低血压。高龄、淋巴细胞<790/mm3 和 BNP>240pg/mL 是与需要 IMV 独立相关的因素。

结论

该队列的总体死亡率为 15%,但根据所决定的治疗方法(最大治疗与 LTE)差异很大,死亡率相差 9 倍,且风险因素也不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb8/7987197/e6a0979a44bb/pone.0248869.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验