Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Dermatology, Allergy Unit, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(8):736-743. doi: 10.1159/000514262. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
Few studies assess biologicals such as, omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The reported success rate in these studies differ, and it remains uncertain if there are any biomarkers to predict successful therapy. Our aim was to analyze the therapeutic outcome in a real life setting and to identify predictive biomarkers for successful treatment.
Data from patients with CRSwNP treated with a monoclonal antibody between November 2014 and January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Improvement in the polyp score and clinical symptoms like nasal obstruction, sense of smell, nasal discharge, and facial pain were evaluated. Other characteristics, including use of nasal or systemic steroids, comorbidities, previous history of sinus surgery, eosinophilia tissue, blood values (eosinophils, total immunoglobulin E, eosinophilic cationic protein, and interleukin 5), and allergic sensitization in serum were also investigated to identify possible predictive biomarkers.
Forty-eight treatments in 29 patients (m/f = 15/14) aged 27-70 years were reviewed. Treatments with mepolizumab showed the best success rates (78.9%), followed by omalizumab (50%) and benralizumab treatments (50%). However, a correlation between biomarkers and treatment success could not be found.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Treatment of CRSwNP with biologicals is a promising option for severe cases not responding to conventional therapy, including difficult-to-treat patients. Predictive biomarkers for a successful treatment could not be identified, but the reduction of eosinophilic cationic protein was linked with the response.
很少有研究评估奥马珠单抗、美泊利单抗、贝那利珠单抗和度匹鲁单抗等生物制剂在患有慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的患者中的疗效。这些研究报告的成功率存在差异,目前仍不确定是否存在任何生物标志物来预测治疗成功。我们的目的是在真实环境中分析治疗结果,并确定预测治疗成功的生物标志物。
回顾性分析了 2014 年 11 月至 2020 年 1 月期间接受单克隆抗体治疗的 CRSwNP 患者的数据。评估了息肉评分的改善以及鼻塞、嗅觉、鼻分泌物和面部疼痛等临床症状的改善情况。还研究了其他特征,包括鼻用或全身皮质类固醇的使用、合并症、既往鼻窦手术史、嗜酸性粒细胞组织、血液值(嗜酸性粒细胞、总免疫球蛋白 E、嗜酸性阳离子蛋白和白细胞介素 5)和血清中的过敏敏化情况,以确定可能的预测生物标志物。
共回顾了 29 名患者(男/女=15/14)48 次治疗,年龄 27-70 岁。美泊利珠单抗治疗的成功率最高(78.9%),其次是奥马珠单抗(50%)和贝那利珠单抗治疗(50%)。然而,未发现生物标志物与治疗成功之间存在相关性。
讨论/结论:生物制剂治疗 CRSwNP 是对常规治疗反应不佳的严重病例的一种有前途的选择,包括难以治疗的患者。未能确定预测治疗成功的生物标志物,但嗜酸性阳离子蛋白的减少与反应相关。