• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PALM-COEIN 分类系统与异常子宫出血患者的经典术语。

PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

机构信息

Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.

出版信息

Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(4):257-261. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0011. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.5603/GP.a2021.0011
PMID:33757147
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the FIGO's novel classification system versus the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out between August 2015 and September 2019 in the Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. The pathology reports of the patients were classified according to the PALM-COEIN method and were compared with classical terminology. The operated patients with fibroids reported in the pathology results were classified as subgroups of fibroids.

RESULTS

Evaluation was made of a total of 515 women with abnormal uterine bleeding. According to the classical terminology, 137 (26.6%) patients were defined with hypermenorrhea, 74 (14.4%) with menorrhagia, 57 (11.1%) with metrorrhagia, and 246 (47.8%) with menometrorrhagia. In the PALM-COEIN classification system, polyps were determined in 84 (16.3%) cases, adenomyosis in 228 [diffuse adenomyosis: 196 (38.1%), local adenomyosis: 32 (6.2%)], leiomyoma in 386 [submu-cous: 161 (31.1%), other types: 225 (43.9%)], and malignancy and hyperplasia in 47 (9.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The classical terminology for abnormal uterine bleeding is insufficient in terms of etiological pathologies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The widespread use of this novel system for the abnormal uterine bleeding classification will provide a more useful communication between physicians and researchers.

摘要

目的

评估FIGO 新分类系统与异常子宫出血患者经典术语的差异。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究于 2015 年 8 月至 2019 年 9 月在加济大学医学院附属医院进行。根据 PALM-COEIN 方法对患者的病理报告进行分类,并与经典术语进行比较。病理结果报告的子宫肌瘤患者被归类为子宫肌瘤亚组。

结果

共评估了 515 例异常子宫出血患者。根据经典术语,137 例(26.6%)患者被定义为月经过多,74 例(14.4%)为经量过多,57 例(11.1%)为不规则子宫出血,246 例(47.8%)为经期延长。在 PALM-COEIN 分类系统中,84 例(16.3%)为息肉,228 例(38.1%为弥漫性子宫腺肌病,6.2%为局限性子宫腺肌病)为子宫腺肌病,386 例(31.1%为黏膜下肌瘤,43.9%为其他类型肌瘤)为子宫肌瘤,47 例(9.1%)为恶性肿瘤和增生。

结论

经典术语在非妊娠育龄妇女异常子宫出血的病因学方面不够充分。广泛使用这种新的异常子宫出血分类系统将为医生和研究人员之间提供更有用的沟通。

相似文献

1
PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.PALM-COEIN 分类系统与异常子宫出血患者的经典术语。
Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(4):257-261. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0011. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Comparison of classic terminology with the FIGO PALM-COEIN system for classification of the underlying causes of abnormal uterine bleeding.经典术语与国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)子宫异常出血病因分类的PALM-COEIN系统的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;133(3):325-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.033. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
PALM-COEIN Nomenclature for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.异常子宫出血的PALM-COEIN命名法。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 May;61(3):376-9. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12440. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
4
Etiology distribution of abnormal uterine bleeding according to FIGO classification system: A combined study of ultrasound and histopathology.FIGO 分类系统下异常子宫出血的病因分布:超声与组织病理学联合研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Jul;48(7):1913-1920. doi: 10.1111/jog.15226. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Study of causes behind abnormal uterine bleeding according to PALM- COEIN classification at a tertiary care hospital.在一家三级护理医院按照PALM-COEIN分类法对异常子宫出血的病因进行研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;70(1):154-157. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.2749.
6
The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions.FIGO 两种正常和异常子宫出血症状系统及其生殖年龄段异常子宫出血病因分类:2018 年修订版。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;143(3):393-408. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12666. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Abnormal uterine bleeding.子宫异常出血
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jul;34:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
8
FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age.FIGO 分类系统(PALM-COEIN)用于非妊娠育龄妇女异常子宫出血的病因。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;113(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
9
Etiology of Chronic Abnormal Uterine Bleeding According to the FIGO's PALM-COEIN Classification in Bangladeshi Women of Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Study.根据FIGO 的 PALM-COEIN 分类,孟加拉国育龄妇女慢性异常子宫出血的病因:一项横断面研究。
Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Apr;31(2):312-317.
10
Clinical bleeding patterns and management techniques of abnormal uterine bleeding at a teaching and referral hospital in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部一所教学和转诊医院异常子宫出血的临床出血模式和管理技术。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 2;15(12):e0243166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243166. eCollection 2020.