Suppr超能文献

一种简短的筛查工具能否区分治疗肥胖症患者中的过度进食和暴食?

Can a Short Screening Tool Discriminate Between Overeating and Binge Eating in Treatment-Seeking Individuals with Obesity?

机构信息

Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Apr;29(4):706-712. doi: 10.1002/oby.23128.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Existing screening tools are inadequate in differentiating binge eating from normative overeating in treatment-seeking individuals with overweight or obesity, as these individuals tend to overendorse loss-of-control (LOC; the hallmark characteristic of binge eating) on self-report measures. In order for treatment centers to efficiently and accurately identify individuals who would benefit from specialized treatment, it is critical to develop effective brief screening tools. This study examined the sensitivity and specificity of a self-report screener designed to be used by an outpatient treatment center on a large scale.

METHODS

Participants were treatment-seeking individuals (N = 364) with overweight or obesity who were administered the screener and who completed a subsequent interview assessing for LOC and binge eating.

RESULTS

Discriminant analyses revealed that the screener achieved 77.6% sensitivity and 77.0% specificity in predicting clinician-assessed LOC and 75.2% sensitivity and 74.1% specificity in predicting "full-threshold" binge eating (i.e., ≥12 objectively large binge-eating episodes within the past 3 months). Post hoc analyses indicated that male participants were more likely to be misclassified with the screener.

CONCLUSIONS

The self-report screener demonstrated satisfactory predictive ability, which is notable given the challenges of discriminating between LOC and normative overeating. However, room for improvement remains. In particular, the inclusion of additional screener items that more fully capture the binge-eating experience in males is warranted.

摘要

目的

现有的筛选工具在区分治疗寻求超重或肥胖个体的暴食与正常性过量进食方面存在不足,因为这些个体在自我报告测量中往往过度认可失控(暴食的标志特征)。为了使治疗中心能够有效地、准确地识别出那些将从专门治疗中受益的个体,开发有效的简短筛选工具至关重要。本研究检验了一个旨在由门诊治疗中心大规模使用的自我报告筛查器的敏感性和特异性。

方法

参与者为超重或肥胖的治疗寻求者(N=364),他们接受了筛查,并完成了后续访谈,以评估失控和暴食。

结果

判别分析显示,该筛查器在预测临床医生评估的失控方面的敏感性为 77.6%,特异性为 77.0%,在预测“全阈值”暴食(即过去 3 个月内≥12 次客观大暴食发作)方面的敏感性为 75.2%,特异性为 74.1%。事后分析表明,男性参与者更有可能被筛查器错误分类。

结论

自我报告筛查器表现出令人满意的预测能力,这在区分失控和正常性过量进食方面具有重要意义。然而,仍有改进的空间。特别是,值得考虑在筛查器中增加更多的项目,以更全面地捕捉男性的暴食体验。

相似文献

5
Loss of control in binge-eating disorder: Fear and resignation.暴食障碍中的失控:恐惧与听天由命。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun;56(6):1199-1206. doi: 10.1002/eat.23929. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
8
Development and validation of the eating loss of control scale.失控饮食量表的编制与验证
Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):77-89. doi: 10.1037/a0034729. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
Development of the 7-Item Binge-Eating Disorder Screener (BEDS-7).7项暴饮暴食障碍筛查量表(BEDS-7)的开发。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2016 Apr 28;18(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.15m01896. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

3
Psychological features in obesity: A network analysis.肥胖的心理特征:网络分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Feb;53(2):248-255. doi: 10.1002/eat.23190. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
5
Eating Disorders in Ethnic Minorities: an Update.少数民族中的饮食失调:最新研究进展。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Aug 29;20(10):90. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0938-3.
6
Screening for Binge Eating Disorder in people with obesity.肥胖人群中暴食障碍的筛查。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018 May-Jun;12(3):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.敏感性和特异性分析的最小样本量要求。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):YE01-YE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18129.8744. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验