Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Apr;29(4):706-712. doi: 10.1002/oby.23128.
Existing screening tools are inadequate in differentiating binge eating from normative overeating in treatment-seeking individuals with overweight or obesity, as these individuals tend to overendorse loss-of-control (LOC; the hallmark characteristic of binge eating) on self-report measures. In order for treatment centers to efficiently and accurately identify individuals who would benefit from specialized treatment, it is critical to develop effective brief screening tools. This study examined the sensitivity and specificity of a self-report screener designed to be used by an outpatient treatment center on a large scale.
Participants were treatment-seeking individuals (N = 364) with overweight or obesity who were administered the screener and who completed a subsequent interview assessing for LOC and binge eating.
Discriminant analyses revealed that the screener achieved 77.6% sensitivity and 77.0% specificity in predicting clinician-assessed LOC and 75.2% sensitivity and 74.1% specificity in predicting "full-threshold" binge eating (i.e., ≥12 objectively large binge-eating episodes within the past 3 months). Post hoc analyses indicated that male participants were more likely to be misclassified with the screener.
The self-report screener demonstrated satisfactory predictive ability, which is notable given the challenges of discriminating between LOC and normative overeating. However, room for improvement remains. In particular, the inclusion of additional screener items that more fully capture the binge-eating experience in males is warranted.
现有的筛选工具在区分治疗寻求超重或肥胖个体的暴食与正常性过量进食方面存在不足,因为这些个体在自我报告测量中往往过度认可失控(暴食的标志特征)。为了使治疗中心能够有效地、准确地识别出那些将从专门治疗中受益的个体,开发有效的简短筛选工具至关重要。本研究检验了一个旨在由门诊治疗中心大规模使用的自我报告筛查器的敏感性和特异性。
参与者为超重或肥胖的治疗寻求者(N=364),他们接受了筛查,并完成了后续访谈,以评估失控和暴食。
判别分析显示,该筛查器在预测临床医生评估的失控方面的敏感性为 77.6%,特异性为 77.0%,在预测“全阈值”暴食(即过去 3 个月内≥12 次客观大暴食发作)方面的敏感性为 75.2%,特异性为 74.1%。事后分析表明,男性参与者更有可能被筛查器错误分类。
自我报告筛查器表现出令人满意的预测能力,这在区分失控和正常性过量进食方面具有重要意义。然而,仍有改进的空间。特别是,值得考虑在筛查器中增加更多的项目,以更全面地捕捉男性的暴食体验。