Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Sep;55(9):1171-1193. doi: 10.1002/eat.23769. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
This review aimed to examine the validity of self-report screening questionnaires for identifying eating disorder (ED) risk in adults and adolescents with overweight/obesity.
Five databases were searched from inception to September 2020 for studies assessing validation of self-report ED screening questionnaires against diagnostic interviews in adolescents and adults with overweight/obesity. The review was registered with PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=220013).
Twenty-seven papers examining 15 questionnaires were included. Most studies validated questionnaires for adults (22 of 27 studies), and most questionnaires (12 of 15) screened for binge eating or binge-eating disorder (BED). The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (sensitivity = .16-.88, specificity = .62-1.0) and Questionnaire on Eating and Weight Patterns (sensitivity = .07-1.0, specificity = .0-1.0) were most frequently validated (six studies each). Five studies of three questionnaires were in adolescents, with the Adolescent Binge-Eating Disorder Questionnaire having highest sensitivity (1.0) but lower specificity (.27). Questionnaires designed to screen for BED generally had higher diagnostic accuracy than those screening for EDs in general.
Questionnaires have been well validated to identify BED in adults with overweight/obesity. Validated screening tools to identify other EDs in adults and any ED in adolescents with overweight/obesity are lacking. Thus, clinical assessment should inform the identification of patients with co-morbid EDs and overweight/obesity.
Individuals with overweight/obesity are at increased risk of EDs. This review highlights literature gaps regarding screening for ED risk in this vulnerable group. This work presents possibilities for improving care of individuals with overweight/obesity by reinventing ED screening tools to be better suited to diverse populations.
本综述旨在检验用于识别超重/肥胖青少年和成年人饮食障碍(ED)风险的自报筛查问卷的有效性。
从建库到 2020 年 9 月,在五个数据库中检索评估针对超重/肥胖青少年和成年人的诊断性访谈对自报 ED 筛查问卷进行验证的研究。该综述在 PROSPERO(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=220013)上进行了注册。
共纳入 27 项研究 15 种问卷。大多数研究验证了针对成年人的问卷(27 项研究中的 22 项),且大多数问卷(15 种中的 12 种)筛查暴食或暴食障碍(BED)。饮食障碍检查问卷(敏感性为 0.16-0.88,特异性为 0.62-1.0)和饮食和体重模式问卷(敏感性为 0.07-1.0,特异性为 0.0-1.0)的验证最频繁(各有 6 项研究)。三项问卷中有五项研究在青少年中进行,其中青少年暴食障碍问卷的敏感性最高(1.0),但特异性较低(0.27)。用于筛查 BED 的问卷通常比用于筛查一般 ED 的问卷具有更高的诊断准确性。
问卷已被很好地验证,可用于识别超重/肥胖成年人中的 BED。缺乏用于识别超重/肥胖青少年中的其他 ED 或任何 ED 的经过验证的筛查工具。因此,临床评估应有助于识别患有共病 ED 和超重/肥胖的患者。
超重/肥胖个体患 ED 的风险增加。本综述强调了有关筛查这一弱势群体 ED 风险的文献空白。这项工作为改进对超重/肥胖个体的护理提供了可能性,通过重新设计更适合不同人群的 ED 筛查工具来实现。