Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University (Samsun, Turkey).
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bülent Ecevit University (Zonguldak, Turkey).
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Mar 22;26(1):e2119248. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.1.e2119248.oar. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study was to compare three teaching methods' time and personnel requirements, and their effects on plaque and gingival indices.
This study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial on fixed orthodontic appliance candidates (n = 90), assigned into a control group (n = 30) and two different study groups (n = 30 each). The control group received standard printed educational material and was assisted with verbal information. The study groups either received video-assisted or hands-on training about fixed orthodontic appliance and oral hygiene. The time requirements for all three educational interventions was recorded during the initial visit. The adequacy of oral hygiene was documented through plaque and gingival indices during the initial visit and eighth week of the treatment. The continuous variables were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA. Tukey HSD and Student t-tests were used for post-hoc comparisons (α?#8197;= 0.05). Also, a chi-square test was used for the analysis of categorical variables.
Standard education failed to maintain the plaque and gingival indices at the eighth week of the treatment. Although both video-assisted and hands-on training took a considerable amount of time, they served well in preserving both of the indices at the eighth week. The longer the educational intervention was, the better the preservation of the plaque and gingival indices.
Educational intervention, either with video-assisted or hands-on programs, provided better results in oral hygiene depending on the time and personnel constraints of the orthodontist.
本研究旨在比较三种教学方法的时间和人力需求,以及它们对菌斑和牙龈指数的影响。
这是一项针对固定正畸矫治器候选者(n = 90)的单盲随机对照试验,将其分为对照组(n = 30)和两个不同的研究组(n = 30)。对照组接受标准的印刷教育材料,并辅以口头信息。研究组接受关于固定正畸矫治器和口腔卫生的视频辅助或实践培训。所有三种教育干预的时间要求在初始就诊时记录。在初始就诊和治疗第八周时,通过菌斑和牙龈指数记录口腔卫生的充分性。使用单因素方差分析对连续变量进行分析。使用 Tukey HSD 和学生 t 检验进行事后比较(α?#8197;= 0.05)。此外,还使用卡方检验分析分类变量。
标准教育未能在治疗第八周时维持菌斑和牙龈指数。虽然视频辅助和实践培训都需要相当多的时间,但它们在第八周时都很好地维持了这两个指数。教育干预时间越长,菌斑和牙龈指数的保存效果越好。
根据正畸医生的时间和人员限制,教育干预无论是通过视频辅助还是实践计划,都能更好地提高口腔卫生效果。