Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Jul 7;6(4):953-961. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab025.
Numerous studies have documented reduced access to patient care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including access to diagnostic or screening tests, prescription medications, and treatment for an ongoing condition. In the context of clinical management for venous thromboembolism, this could result in suboptimal therapy with warfarin. We aimed to determine the impact of the pandemic on utilization of International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing and the percentage of high and low results.
INR data from 11 institutions were extracted to compare testing volume and the percentage of INR results ≥3.5 and ≤1.5 between a pre-pandemic period (January-June 2019, period 1) and a portion of the COVID-19 pandemic period (January-June 2020, period 2). The analysis was performed for inpatient and outpatient cohorts.
Testing volumes showed relatively little change in January and February, followed by a significant decrease in March, April, and May, and then returned to baseline in June. Outpatient testing showed a larger percentage decrease in testing volume compared to inpatient testing. At 10 of the 11 study sites, we observed an increase in the percentage of abnormal high INR results as test volumes decreased, primarily among outpatients.
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted INR testing among outpatients which may be attributable to several factors. Increased supratherapeutic INR results during the pandemic period when there was reduced laboratory utilization and access to care is concerning because of the risk of adverse bleeding events in this group of patients. This could be mitigated in the future by offering drive-through testing and/or widespread implementation of home INR monitoring.
许多研究记录了由于 COVID-19 大流行导致患者护理减少,包括获得诊断或筛查测试、处方药物以及治疗持续疾病的机会减少。在静脉血栓栓塞症的临床管理中,这可能导致华法林治疗效果不理想。我们旨在确定大流行对国际标准化比值(INR)检测的利用和高值和低值结果的百分比的影响。
从 11 个机构提取 INR 数据,以比较大流行前时期(2019 年 1 月至 6 月,第 1 期)和 COVID-19 大流行期间的一部分(2020 年 1 月至 6 月,第 2 期)的检测量和 INR 结果≥3.5 和≤1.5 的百分比。对住院患者和门诊患者队列进行了分析。
1 月和 2 月的检测量相对变化不大,随后 3 月、4 月和 5 月检测量显著下降,6 月恢复到基线。与住院患者相比,门诊患者的检测量下降幅度更大。在 11 个研究地点中的 10 个地点,我们观察到随着检测量的减少,异常高 INR 结果的百分比增加,主要是在门诊患者中。
COVID-19 大流行影响了门诊患者的 INR 检测,这可能归因于多种因素。在实验室利用率和医疗服务获取减少的大流行期间,INR 结果升高,这令人担忧,因为这群患者发生不良出血事件的风险增加。未来可以通过提供免下车检测和/或广泛实施家庭 INR 监测来缓解这种情况。