• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让 2 型糖尿病患者参与促进心血管筛查计划的实施。

Involving people with type 2 diabetes in facilitating participation in a cardiovascular screening programme.

机构信息

Vascular Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Central Denmark, Viborg, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):880-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13228. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13228
PMID:33761174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8235888/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge is lacking about how to increase uptake among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) invited to preventive initiatives like cardiovascular screening.

AIM

To explore how to improve participation of people with T2D in cardiovascular screening using patient and public involvement (PPI).

METHODS

Patient and public involvement was included in a qualitative research design. From April to October 2019, we invited 40- to 60-year-old people with T2D (n = 17) to individual consultative meetings, using an interviewing approach. Before the interviews, participants were asked to read a proposed invitation letter to be used in a cardiovascular screening programme. Inductive content analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Participants considered cardiovascular screening important and beneficial from both a personal and social perspective. We found that the relational interaction between the person with T2D and the health-care professional was key to participation and that nudging captured through the design of the screening programme and the wording of the invitation letter was requested.

CONCLUSION

In preventive initiatives perceived as meaningful by the invitee, a focus on recruitment is crucial to facilitate participation. This study contributed with knowledge about how to promote participation by involving health-care professionals in recruitment initiatives and through nudging. This knowledge may assist researchers, policymakers and ethicists' understanding and assessment of the ethical appropriateness and public acceptability of nudging in cardiovascular screening.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

By consulting 17 people with T2D, we are now in a position to suggest how a screening initiative should be altered because tools to improve uptake have been identified.

摘要

背景

对于如何提高 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者参与心血管筛查等预防措施的积极性,我们知之甚少。

目的

探索如何利用患者和公众参与(PPI)提高 T2D 患者参与心血管筛查的积极性。

方法

本研究采用定性研究设计,纳入了患者和公众参与。2019 年 4 月至 10 月,我们邀请了 17 名年龄在 40 至 60 岁之间的 T2D 患者参加了个体咨询会议,并采用访谈的方式进行。在访谈之前,参与者被要求阅读拟用于心血管筛查计划的邀请信。我们采用了归纳式内容分析法进行分析。

结果

参与者认为心血管筛查从个人和社会角度来看都是重要且有益的。我们发现,T2D 患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的关系互动是参与的关键,并且需要通过筛查计划的设计和邀请信的措辞来实现这种推动。

结论

在被邀请者认为有意义的预防措施中,关注招募对于促进参与至关重要。本研究为如何通过让医疗保健专业人员参与招募活动以及通过推动来促进参与提供了知识。这些知识可以帮助研究人员、政策制定者和伦理学家理解和评估在心血管筛查中推动的伦理适当性和公众可接受性。

患者或公众的贡献

通过咨询 17 名 T2D 患者,我们现在可以提出应该如何改变筛查计划,因为已经确定了提高参与度的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/8235888/491ec2ffa567/HEX-24-880-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/8235888/491ec2ffa567/HEX-24-880-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c918/8235888/491ec2ffa567/HEX-24-880-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Involving people with type 2 diabetes in facilitating participation in a cardiovascular screening programme.让 2 型糖尿病患者参与促进心血管筛查计划的实施。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):880-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13228. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
Facilitating participation in cardiovascular preventive initiatives among people with diabetes: a qualitative study.促进糖尿病患者参与心血管疾病预防倡议:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10172-6.
3
Perspectives of deprived patients on diabetes self-management programmes delivered by the local primary care team: a qualitative study on facilitators and barriers for participation, in France.被剥夺医疗服务患者对基层医疗团队提供的糖尿病自我管理项目的看法:法国一项关于参与的促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05715-3.
4
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Facilitators and barriers to participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programme from the perspective of healthcare professionals: Qualitative research study.基于医疗保健专业人员的视角探讨参与人群结直肠癌筛查计划的促进因素和障碍:定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Nov;30(6):e13507. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13507. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
6
Attitudes and opinions of Oral healthcare professionals on screening for Type-2 diabetes.口腔保健专业人员对2型糖尿病筛查的态度和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06756-y.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Screening for type 2 diabetes is feasible, acceptable, but associated with increased short-term anxiety: a randomised controlled trial in British general practice.2型糖尿病筛查是可行的且可接受的,但会导致短期焦虑增加:英国全科医疗中的一项随机对照试验
BMC Public Health. 2008 Oct 7;8:350. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-350.
9
10
Barriers to cervical cancer prevention in rural Cameroon: a qualitative study on healthcare providers' perspective.喀麦隆农村地区宫颈癌预防障碍:基于医疗服务提供者视角的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):e043637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043637.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease: protocol for the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey.下肢、颈动脉及主动脉疾病的自我报告结局:丹麦血管(DanVasc)调查方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 2;15(5):e092479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092479.
2
Arabic-speaking male immigrants' perceptions of preventive initiatives: An interview study.阿拉伯语男性移民对预防措施的看法:一项访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1618-1627. doi: 10.1111/hex.13766. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding and optimising patient and public involvement in trial oversight: an ethnographic study of eight clinical trials.理解和优化患者和公众对试验监督的参与:对八项临床试验的民族志研究。
Trials. 2020 Jun 18;21(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04495-9.
2
Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening.系统评价作为一种“证据之镜”:乳腺癌筛查参与的决定因素。
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):70-79. doi: 10.1177/0969141320930743. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Feasibility Study of Advanced Cardiovascular Screening in Middle-Aged Patients with Diabetes.
中年糖尿病患者高级心血管筛查的可行性研究
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May 6;12:447-455. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S246636. eCollection 2020.
4
Pharmacological Preventive Potential Among Attenders at Vascular Screening: Findings from the VIVA Trial.血管筛查就诊者的药物预防潜力:来自 VIVA 试验的结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):662-673. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.039. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Non-attendance at diabetes outpatient appointments: a systematic review.糖尿病门诊失约:系统综述。
Diabet Med. 2020 Sep;37(9):1427-1442. doi: 10.1111/dme.14241. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Incorporating patients' perspectives into the initial stages of core outcome set development: a rapid review of qualitative studies of type 2 diabetes.将患者观点纳入核心结局集开发的初始阶段:2 型糖尿病定性研究的快速综述。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Feb 28;7(1):e000615. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000615. eCollection 2019.
7
Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations.随机对照试验比较了 NHS 健康检查在标准信件、风险个性化信件和电话邀请三种方式下的参与率。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 21;19(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6540-8.
8
Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis.患者和公众参与对临床试验入组和保留的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738.
9
Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review.在初级保健中参与心血管代谢疾病健康检查的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;25(12):1326-1340. doi: 10.1177/2047487318780751. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
10
A population-based screening study for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in Danish postmenopausal women: acceptability and prevalence.丹麦绝经后女性心血管疾病和糖尿病的基于人群的筛查研究:可接受性和患病率
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0758-8.