• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健中参与心血管代谢疾病健康检查的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。

Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review.

机构信息

1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, the Netherlands.

2 Department of Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;25(12):1326-1340. doi: 10.1177/2047487318780751. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1177/2047487318780751
PMID:29916723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6097107/
Abstract

Background Health checks for cardiometabolic diseases could play a role in the identification of persons at high risk for disease. To improve the uptake of these health checks in primary care, we need to know what barriers and facilitators determine participation. Methods We used an iterative search strategy consisting of three steps: (a) identification of key-articles; (b) systematic literature search in PubMed, Medline and Embase based on keywords; (c) screening of titles and abstracts and subsequently full-text screening. We summarised the results into four categories: characteristics, attitudes, practical reasons and healthcare provider-related factors. Results Thirty-nine studies were included. Attitudes such as wanting to know of cardiometabolic disease risk, feeling responsible for, and concerns about one's own health were facilitators for participation. Younger age, smoking, low education and attitudes such as not wanting to be, or being, worried about the outcome, low perceived severity or susceptibility, and negative attitude towards health checks or prevention in general were barriers. Furthermore, practical issues such as information and the ease of access to appointments could influence participation. Conclusion Barriers and facilitators to participation in health checks for cardiometabolic diseases were heterogeneous. Hence, it is not possible to develop a 'one size fits all' approach to maximise the uptake. For optimal implementation we suggest a multifactorial approach adapted to the national context with special attention to people who might be more difficult to reach. Increasing the uptake of health checks could contribute to identifying the people at risk to be able to start preventive interventions.

摘要

背景

针对心脏代谢疾病的健康检查可能有助于发现高危人群。为了提高这些健康检查在初级保健中的利用率,我们需要了解哪些障碍和促进因素决定了参与度。

方法

我们使用了一个迭代搜索策略,包括三个步骤:(a)确定关键文章;(b)基于关键词在 PubMed、Medline 和 Embase 中进行系统文献搜索;(c)筛选标题和摘要,然后进行全文筛选。我们将结果总结为四个类别:特征、态度、实际原因和医疗保健提供者相关因素。

结果

共纳入 39 项研究。想要了解心脏代谢疾病风险、感到有责任、关心自己的健康等态度是参与的促进因素。年龄较小、吸烟、教育程度较低、不想担心结果、对健康检查或预防的态度消极、认为严重程度或易感性低等态度是参与的障碍。此外,信息和预约的便利性等实际问题也可能影响参与度。

结论

参与心脏代谢疾病健康检查的障碍和促进因素具有异质性。因此,不可能制定一种“一刀切”的方法来最大限度地提高利用率。为了实现最佳实施效果,我们建议采取一种多因素方法,并根据国情进行调整,特别关注那些可能更难接触到的人群。提高健康检查的利用率可以帮助识别有风险的人群,以便能够开始进行预防性干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abd/6097107/83af8302078e/10.1177_2047487318780751-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abd/6097107/6910715663ef/10.1177_2047487318780751-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abd/6097107/83af8302078e/10.1177_2047487318780751-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abd/6097107/6910715663ef/10.1177_2047487318780751-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7abd/6097107/83af8302078e/10.1177_2047487318780751-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review.在初级保健中参与心血管代谢疾病健康检查的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;25(12):1326-1340. doi: 10.1177/2047487318780751. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Barriers and facilitators among health professionals in primary care to prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: A systematic review.基层医疗保健专业人员预防心脏代谢疾病的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 23;35(4):383-398. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx137.
3
Implementing cardiometabolic health checks in general practice: a qualitative process evaluation.在全科医疗中实施心脏代谢健康检查:一项定性过程评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jul 6;15:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-132.
4
What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review.我们对谁参加和不参加一般健康检查了解多少?叙事范围综述的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 31;12:723. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-723.
5
Patient-perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a medication review in primary care: a qualitative thematic analysis.初级保健中患者对实施用药评估的认知障碍与促进因素:一项定性主题分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0707-0.
6
Willingness to participate in prevention programs for cardiometabolic diseases.参与心血管代谢疾病预防项目的意愿。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:44. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1379-0.
7
Perspectives of older people engaging in nurse-led cardiovascular prevention programmes: a qualitative study in primary care in the Netherlands.参与护士主导的心血管疾病预防项目的老年人观点:荷兰初级保健领域的一项定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jan;65(630):e41-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683149.
8
What is a good health check? An interview study of health check providers' views and practices.什么是一次良好的健康检查?一项关于健康检查提供者观点与实践的访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Oct 2;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0213-x.
9
10
To Check or Not to Check? A Qualitative Study on How the Public Decides on Health Checks for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.检查还是不检查?关于公众如何决定进行心血管疾病预防健康检查的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0159438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159438. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a systematic home-based albuminuria screening programme to detect chronic kidney disease in high-risk individuals in primary care (SALINE): a cross-sectional screening study.一项基于家庭的系统性蛋白尿筛查计划在基层医疗中对高危个体检测慢性肾脏病的有效性(SALINE):一项横断面筛查研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Apr 8;82:103185. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103185. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care.介绍 PALETTE 方法:一种用于进行姑息治疗综述文献检索的迭代方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jun 2;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0335-z.
2
Barriers and facilitators among health professionals in primary care to prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: A systematic review.基层医疗保健专业人员预防心脏代谢疾病的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 23;35(4):383-398. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx137.
3
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Empowering communities to use healthy lifestyle centres: an implementation research from Sri Lanka.赋权社区使用健康生活方式中心:来自斯里兰卡的实施研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e075634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075634.
4
Factors for the integration of prevention in primary care: an overview of reviews.初级保健中预防整合的因素:综述概述
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0141. Print 2024 Oct.
5
Under-utilisation of noncommunicable disease screening and healthy lifestyle promotion centres: A cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka.非传染性疾病筛查和促进健康生活方式中心的未充分利用:来自斯里兰卡的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0301510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301510. eCollection 2024.
6
Preventive Health Checkup: Utilization, Motivators, and Barriers Among the General Population in a Rural District in Tamil Nadu, India.预防性健康检查:印度泰米尔纳德邦一个农村地区普通人群中的利用情况、动机及障碍
Cureus. 2024 Jan 18;16(1):e52529. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52529. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
'In the end, I'm the one who has to do the job': Participant experience of a lifestyle intervention for patients with hypertension.“最终,我是那个必须完成这项工作的人”:高血压患者生活方式干预的参与者体验。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Dec;41(4):457-468. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2271042. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
8
Exploring targeted preventive health check interventions - a realist synthesis.探索有针对性的预防保健检查干预措施 - 一个现实主义的综合研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1928. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16861-8.
9
Pharmacological and Nutritional Modulation of Metabolome and Metagenome in Cardiometabolic Disorders.心脏代谢紊乱中代谢组和宏基因组的药理学与营养调节
Biomolecules. 2023 Sep 2;13(9):1340. doi: 10.3390/biom13091340.
10
Factors influencing the decision to use state-funded healthy lifestyle centres in a low-income setting: a qualitative study from Sri Lanka.影响在低收入环境下使用政府资助的健康生活方式中心的决策因素:来自斯里兰卡的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 4;13(7):e067464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067464.
Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
4
Determinants of participation in a cardiometabolic health check among underserved groups.服务不足群体参与心脏代谢健康检查的决定因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Apr 30;4:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.04.009. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).2016年欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会及其他学会心血管疾病预防临床实践联合工作组第六版(由10个学会的代表及特邀专家组成):由欧洲心血管预防与康复协会(EACPR)提供特别贡献制定而成。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):NP1-NP96. doi: 10.1177/2047487316653709. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: More patient gender-based differences in risk evaluation among male general practitioners.心血管疾病的一级预防:男性全科医生在风险评估中存在更多基于患者性别的差异。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Nov;23(17):1831-1838. doi: 10.1177/2047487316648476. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: a cross-sectional study.社会经济剥夺对初级预防人群心血管疾病风险筛查的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 21;6(3):e009984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009984.
8
The NHS Health Check in England: an evaluation of the first 4 years.英格兰国民健康服务健康检查:对前四年的评估
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e008840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008840.
9
Improving cardiovascular prevention in general practice: Results of a comprehensive personalized strategy in subjects at high risk.改善全科医学中的心血管预防:高危人群综合个性化策略的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(9):947-55. doi: 10.1177/2047487315613664. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
Lessons learned from England's Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice.从英国健康检查计划中吸取的经验教训:运用定性研究来识别和分享最佳实践。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 20;16:144. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0365-z.