Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome - La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;61(6):945-953. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
True aneurysms of the peri-pancreatic arcade (PDAA) have been attributed to increased collateral flow related to coeliac axis (CA) occlusion by a median arcuate ligament (MAL). Although PDAA exclusion is currently recommended, simultaneous CA release and the technique to be used are debated. The aim of this retrospective multicentre study was to compare the results of open surgical repair of true non-ruptured PDAA with release or CA bypass (group A) vs. coil embolisation of PDAA and CA stenting or laparoscopic release (group B).
From January 1994 to February 2019, 57 consecutive patients (group A: 31 patients; group B: 26 patients), including 35 (61%) men (mean age 56 ± 11 years), were treated at three centres. Twenty-six patients (46%) presented with non-specific abdominal pain: 15 (48%) in group A and 11 (42%) in group B (p = .80).
No patient died during the post-operative period. At 30 days, all PDAAs following open repair and embolisation had been treated successfully. In group A, all CAs treated by MAL release or bypass were patent. In group B, 2/12 CA stentings failed at < 48 hours, and all MAL released by laparoscopy were successful. Median length of hospital stay was significantly greater in group A than in group B (5 vs. 3 days; p = .001). In group A, all PDAAs remained excluded. In group B, three PDAA recanalisations following embolisation were treated successfully (two redo embolisations and one open surgical resection). At six years, Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom for PDAA recanalisation were 100% in group A, and 88% ± 6% in group B (p = .082). No PDAA ruptured during follow up. In group A, all 37 CAs treated by MAL release were patent, and one aortohepatic bypass occluded. In group B, five CAs occluded: four after stenting and the other after laparoscopic MAL release with two redo stenting and three aortohepatic bypasses. Estimates of freedom from CA restenosis/occlusion were 95% ± 3% for MAL release or visceral bypass, and 60% ± 9% for CA stenting (p = .001). Two late restenoses following CA stenting were associated with PDAA recanalisation.
Current data suggest that open and endovascular treatment of PDAA can be performed with excellent post-operative results in both groups. However, PDAA embolisation was associated with few midterm recanalisations and CA stenting with a significant number of early and midterm failures.
真性胰周弓状动脉动脉瘤(PDAA)归因于腹主动脉(CA)阻塞相关的侧支循环增加,由正中弓状韧带(MAL)引起。虽然目前建议排除 PDAA,但 CA 释放的同时以及所使用的技术存在争议。本回顾性多中心研究的目的是比较开放手术修复真性非破裂 PDAA 与 MAL 释放或 CA 旁路(A 组)与 PDAA 线圈栓塞和 CA 支架置入或腹腔镜 MAL 释放(B 组)的结果。
1994 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月,在三个中心治疗了 57 例连续患者(A 组:31 例;B 组:26 例),包括 35 例(61%)男性(平均年龄 56±11 岁)。26 例(46%)表现为非特异性腹痛:A 组 15 例(48%),B 组 11 例(42%)(p=0.80)。
术后无患者死亡。在 30 天内,所有接受开放修复和栓塞治疗的 PDAA 均成功治疗。在 A 组中,所有通过 MAL 释放或旁路治疗的 CA 均通畅。在 B 组中,12 例 CA 支架中有 2 例在 48 小时内失败,所有通过腹腔镜释放的 MAL 均成功。A 组的住院时间中位数明显长于 B 组(5 天 vs. 3 天;p=0.001)。在 A 组中,所有 PDAA 均保持排除。在 B 组中,3 例栓塞后 PDAA 再通成功(2 例再次栓塞和 1 例开放手术切除)。6 年时,A 组 PDAA 再通的 Kaplan-Meier 估计无复通率为 100%,B 组为 88%±6%(p=0.082)。在随访期间没有 PDAA 破裂。在 A 组中,所有 37 例通过 MAL 释放治疗的 CA 均通畅,1 例肝主动脉旁路闭塞。在 B 组中,5 例 CA 闭塞:4 例支架置入后,另 1 例腹腔镜 MAL 释放后发生,需要 2 次支架置入和 3 次肝主动脉旁路。MAL 释放或内脏旁路的 CA 再狭窄/闭塞无复通率估计为 95%±3%,CA 支架置入的无复通率为 60%±9%(p=0.001)。2 例 CA 支架置入后晚期再狭窄与 PDAA 再通有关。
目前的数据表明,PDAA 的开放和血管内治疗在两组中均能取得良好的术后效果。然而,PDAA 栓塞与中期再通率较低有关,CA 支架置入与早期和中期失败率较高有关。