• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

覆膜支架治疗胰腺手术后动脉并发症:复发风险评估和支架植入围手术期管理。

Covered stent treatment for arterial complications after pancreatic surgery: risk assessment for recurrence and peri-stent implantation management.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Rd. (No.2), Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Luwan Branch of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 149 Chongqing Rd. (S), Shanghai, 200020, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar;33(3):1779-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09134-2. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-09134-2
PMID:36149482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9510453/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the risk factors for recurrence of arterial complications after pancreatectomy during the period of covered stent implantation and to provide some opinions on peri-stent implantation management.

METHODS

Data on patients implanted with covered stents due to arterial complications after pancreatectomy between January 2017 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Technical success, clinical success, recurrence, and survival were evaluated to elucidate the practicability of covered stents. Wilson score, Random Forest, logistic regression, and Pearson's chi-square test with bootstrap aggregation were performed for determining the perioperative risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

Among all fifty-five patients, success stent implantation (technical success) was achieved 100%. Patients who were hemodynamically stabilized without further treatment for artery complications in situ (clinical success) accounted for 89.1%. Based on statistical analysis, pre-stent implantation pancreatic fistula was identified as a robust recurrence-related risk factor for preoperative assessment (p = 0.02, OR = 4.5, 95% CI [1.2, 16.9]; p = 0.02). Post-stent implantation pancreatic fistula (p = 0.01, OR 4.5, 95% CI [1.4, 14.6]; p < 0.05) and SMA branches or GDA stumps (p = 0.02, OR 3.4, 95% CI [1.1, 10.3]) were relevant to recurrence. The survival rate during hospitalization was 87.3%. All survivors were free from recurrence during the subsequent follow-up. Vasospasm and stent occlusion were observed as short-term and long-term complications, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A covered stent implantation is a feasible and effective treatment option for post-pancreatectomy arterial complications. Rigorous management of pancreatic fistula, timely detection of problems, sensible strategies during stent implantation, and reasonable anticoagulation therapy are necessary for a better prognosis.

KEY POINTS

• A covered stent is feasible for various artery-related complications after pancreatectomy and has an ideal therapeutic effect. • Pancreatic fistula during the perioperative period of the covered stent is an independent risk factor for recurrent arterial complications and SMA branches or GDA stumps are prone to be recurrent offending arteries. • Rigorous management of pancreatic fistula, timely detection of problems, sensible strategies during stent implantation, and reasonable anticoagulation therapy are necessary for a better prognosis.

摘要

目的

探讨覆膜支架植入期间胰切除术后动脉并发症复发的危险因素,并为支架植入围手术期管理提供一些意见。

方法

回顾性分析 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月因动脉并发症接受覆膜支架植入的患者资料。评估技术成功率、临床成功率、复发和生存情况,以阐明覆膜支架的实用性。采用 Wilson 评分、随机森林、逻辑回归和 Pearson 卡方检验(带 bootstrap 聚集)确定与复发相关的围手术期危险因素。

结果

55 例患者中,支架植入术(技术成功率)成功率为 100%。无需进一步治疗原位动脉并发症而血流动力学稳定的患者(临床成功率)占 89.1%。基于统计分析,支架植入术前胰瘘被确定为术前评估的一个强有力的复发相关危险因素(p=0.02,OR=4.5,95%CI[1.2,16.9];p=0.02)。支架植入术后胰瘘(p=0.01,OR=4.5,95%CI[1.4,14.6];p<0.05)和 SMA 分支或 GDA 残端(p=0.02,OR=3.4,95%CI[1.1,10.3])与复发相关。住院期间的生存率为 87.3%。所有幸存者在随后的随访中均无复发。血管痉挛和支架闭塞分别为短期和长期并发症。

结论

覆膜支架植入术是治疗胰切除术后动脉并发症的一种可行且有效的治疗选择。严格管理胰瘘,及时发现问题,在支架植入过程中采取明智的策略,以及合理的抗凝治疗,对改善预后至关重要。

关键要点

  • 覆膜支架对于胰切除术后各种与动脉相关的并发症是可行的,具有理想的治疗效果。

  • 覆膜支架围手术期的胰瘘是动脉性并发症复发的独立危险因素,SMA 分支或 GDA 残端是易复发的责任动脉。

  • 严格管理胰瘘,及时发现问题,在支架植入过程中采取明智的策略,以及合理的抗凝治疗,对改善预后至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/579295d3d5f3/330_2022_9134_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/156f688ad146/330_2022_9134_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/8a1175c58c00/330_2022_9134_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/c82c156cfefb/330_2022_9134_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/eb4089956e7b/330_2022_9134_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/921d54928546/330_2022_9134_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/579295d3d5f3/330_2022_9134_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/156f688ad146/330_2022_9134_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/8a1175c58c00/330_2022_9134_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/c82c156cfefb/330_2022_9134_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/eb4089956e7b/330_2022_9134_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/921d54928546/330_2022_9134_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a7/9510453/579295d3d5f3/330_2022_9134_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Covered stent treatment for arterial complications after pancreatic surgery: risk assessment for recurrence and peri-stent implantation management.覆膜支架治疗胰腺手术后动脉并发症:复发风险评估和支架植入围手术期管理。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar;33(3):1779-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09134-2. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Stenting for peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities: an evidence-based analysis.下肢外周动脉疾病的支架置入术:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(18):1-88. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Willis Covered Stent for Treatment of Complex Vascular Diseases of the Internal Carotid Artery.Willis覆膜支架治疗颈内动脉复杂血管疾病的疗效与安全性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
4
Heparin-bonded stent graft treatment for major visceral arterial injury after upper abdominal surgery.肝素有结合特性的覆膜支架治疗上腹部手术后主要内脏动脉损伤。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):3221-3227. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5288-8. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
The prognostic value of external vs internal pancreatic duct stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with FRS ≥ 4: a retrospective cohort study.胰十二指肠切除术后 FRS≥4 的患者中,外部与内部胰管支架的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01074-w.
6
Effectiveness and outcome of endovascular therapy for late-onset postpancreatectomy hemorrhage using covered stents and embolization.使用覆膜支架和栓塞术治疗晚期胰腺切除术后出血的血管内治疗的有效性和结果
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1373-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.071. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
7
Covered stent placement for gastroduodenal artery stump hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: long-term patency and risk factor of stent failure.覆膜支架置入治疗胰十二指肠切除术后胃十二指肠动脉残端出血:支架通畅的长期效果和失败的危险因素。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Oct 1;95(1139):20220022. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220022. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
8
Covered vs Uncovered Stents for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.覆膜支架与非覆膜支架治疗主髂动脉和股腘动脉疾病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;23(3):442-52. doi: 10.1177/1526602816643834. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
Long term follow-up after balloon expandable covered stents implantation for management of transcatheter aortic valve replacement related vascular access complications.经皮球囊扩张覆膜支架植入治疗经导管主动脉瓣置换相关血管入路并发症的长期随访。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):903-909. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30385. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Short internal pancreatic stent reduces pancreatic fistula in pancreatoduodenectomy.短内置胰管支架可减少胰十二指肠切除术胰瘘。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):721-728. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02036-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of self-made covered coronary stent in the treatment of coronary artery perforation.自制覆盖式冠状动脉支架治疗冠状动脉穿孔的疗效及安全性。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Nov 4;23(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03575-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Short Term Outcomes of Distal Extended EndoVascular Aortic Repair (DEEVAR) Petticoat in Acute and Subacute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection.急性和亚急性复杂型 B 型主动脉夹层中远端血管内主动脉修复(DEEVAR)裙边的短期结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):569-574. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.044. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Outcomes After Open and Endovascular Repair of Non-Ruptured True Pancreaticoduodenal and Gastroduodenal Artery Aneurysms Associated with Coeliac Artery Compression: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.非破裂性胰十二指肠和胃十二指肠动脉动脉瘤伴腹腔动脉压迫行开放和血管内修复术后的结局:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;61(6):945-953. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
3
Spinal Cord Infarction after Bronchial Artery Embolization for Hemoptysis: A Nationwide Observational Study in Japan.支气管动脉栓塞治疗咯血后脊髓梗死:日本全国观察性研究。
Radiology. 2021 Mar;298(3):673-679. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202500. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban with Warfarin for Patients after Successful Stent Placement for Chronic Iliofemoral Occlusion: A Retrospective Single Institution Study.比较慢性髂股动脉闭塞性病变支架置入术后使用利伐沙班与华法林的安全性和疗效:回顾性单中心研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;61(3):484-489. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.050. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
5
Visualization of Direct Median Nerve Damage Following Transbrachial Arterial Access.经肱动脉穿刺后正中神经直接损伤的可视化
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 25;13(10):1265-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.040. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Network meta-analysis comparing techniques and outcomes of stump closure after distal pancreatectomy.比较远端胰腺切除术后残端闭合技术和结局的网络荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2019 Nov;106(12):1580-1589. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11291. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Centralization of High-Risk Cancer Surgery Within Existing Hospital Systems.高危癌症手术在现有医院系统内的集中化。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;37(34):3234-3242. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02035. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
8
How to deal with hepatic artery injury during pancreaticoduodenectomy. A systematic review.胰十二指肠切除术中肝动脉损伤的处理:一项系统评价
J Visc Surg. 2017 Sep;154(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
9
Effectiveness and outcome of endovascular therapy for late-onset postpancreatectomy hemorrhage using covered stents and embolization.使用覆膜支架和栓塞术治疗晚期胰腺切除术后出血的血管内治疗的有效性和结果
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1373-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.071. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
10
Arterial cutdown reduces complications after brachial access for peripheral vascular intervention.动脉切开术可减少外周血管介入治疗中经肱动脉穿刺后的并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Mar 23.