Suppr超能文献

最新代别血清学检测与美国 FDA 批准检测试剂在恰加斯病诊断中的比较性能。

Comparative Performance of Latest-Generation and FDA-Cleared Serology Tests for the Diagnosis of Chagas Disease.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2021 May 19;59(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00158-21.

Abstract

Confirmed diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease (CD) requires positive results by two different IgG serology tests. Variable sensitivity has been reported among tests and in different geographic regions. Inadequate specificity presents a particular challenge in low-prevalence settings such as the United States. This study provides a direct comparison of the latest-generation IgG serology assays with four previously assessed FDA-cleared tests. Seven hundred ten blood donor plasma specimens were evaluated by Wiener Lisado and Wiener v.4.0 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Abbott PRISM Chagas chemiluminescent assay (ChLIA). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed relative to infection status as determined by the original blood donation testing algorithm. All three latest-generation assays demonstrated 100% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.6 to 100.0). Wiener Lisado, Wiener v.4.0, and Abbott PRISM had sensitivities of 97.1% (95% CI, 95.1 to 98.4), 98.9% (95% CI, 97.4 to 99.6), and 95.5% (95% CI, 93.2 to 97.3), respectively. As with previously evaluated FDA-cleared tests, all three assays had the highest reactivity and sensitivity in samples from donors born in South America and lowest reactivity and sensitivity in specimens from those born in Mexico, with intermediate results in specimens from Central American donors. Wiener v.4.0 had the highest diagnostic sensitivity in all comparisons. Our findings suggest that the latest-generation CD serology tests could improve diagnostic sensitivity without affecting specificity.

摘要

慢性恰加斯病(Chagas disease,CD)的确诊需要两项不同 IgG 血清学检测均呈阳性。不同检测方法和不同地理区域的报道其敏感性存在差异。在低流行地区(如美国),特异性不足是一个特别的挑战。本研究对最新一代 IgG 血清学检测与之前评估的四项经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的检测进行了直接比较。710 份献血者血浆标本经 Wiener Lisado 和 Wiener v.4.0 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)以及 Abbott PRISM 查加斯化学发光免疫分析(ChLIA)检测。根据最初的献血检测算法确定的感染状态评估了敏感性和特异性。三种最新一代检测方法的特异性均为 100%(95%置信区间[CI],98.6%至 100.0%)。Wiener Lisado、Wiener v.4.0 和 Abbott PRISM 的敏感性分别为 97.1%(95%CI,95.1%至 98.4%)、98.9%(95%CI,97.4%至 99.6%)和 95.5%(95%CI,93.2%至 97.3%)。与之前评估的经 FDA 批准的检测方法一样,所有三种检测方法在来自南美的献血者样本中反应性和敏感性最高,在来自墨西哥的样本中反应性和敏感性最低,在来自中美洲的献血者样本中结果居中。Wiener v.4.0 在所有比较中均具有最高的诊断敏感性。我们的研究结果表明,最新一代的 CD 血清学检测可能在不影响特异性的情况下提高诊断敏感性。

相似文献

9
Evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT Chagas prototype assay.评价 Abbott ARCHITECT 克氏锥虫病原型检测法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;69(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.08.019.

引用本文的文献

5
Laboratory diagnosis of infection: a narrative review.感染的实验室诊断:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Parasitol. 2023 May 24;2:1138375. doi: 10.3389/fpara.2023.1138375. eCollection 2023.
6
Diversity of Chagas disease diagnostic antigens: Successes and limitations.克氏锥虫病诊断抗原的多样性:成功与局限。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Oct 1;18(10):e0012512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012512. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8

本文引用的文献

4
Contemporary autochthonous human Chagas disease in the USA.美国当代原生人体克氏锥虫病。
Acta Trop. 2020 May;205:105361. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105361. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Chagas Disease in the United States: a Public Health Approach.美国的恰加斯病:公共卫生方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Nov 27;33(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00023-19. Print 2019 Dec 18.
7
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Chagas disease.恰加斯病诊断与治疗指南。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1486-1487. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30288-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验