Suppr超能文献

不同冲洗液搅动方法对椭圆形根管内细菌减少的效果。

Bacterial Reduction in Oval-Shaped Root Canals After Different Irrigant Agitation Methods.

机构信息

Department of Proclin, Faculty of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Department of Dental Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr;6(1):110-116. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.42204. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the antibacterial effect of Easy Clean®, passive ultrasonic irrigation and sonic irrigation against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in oval-shaped canals.

METHODS

Fifty-five extracted human teeth with similar dimensions were selected. Access cavities were prepared and the root canals were instrumented using Wave One® Primary files (25.08). The root canals were then contaminated with an E. faecalis suspension following incubation for thirty days. The contaminated roots were divided into three experimental groups (n=15) according to the irrigant agitation protocol (Easy Clean, passive ultrassonic irrigation and sonic irrigation), in addition to a positive control group (n=5) and a negative control group (n=5). Microbiological samples were taken from the root canals before instrumentation (S1), after instrumentation (S2) and after the final irrigation protocol (S3). The samples were assayed and incubated for 48 hours in order to obtain the residual titer of E. faecalis cells. Viable cells were quantified by colony-forming units (CFU) measurement. The collected data was submitted to statistical analysis by using Shapiro-Wilk`s test, Wilcoxon paired test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-hoc test. The level of significance was set at 5%.

RESULTS

All experimental groups presented significant reduction on bacterial load after instrumentation (P<0.05) with similar reduction among the groups. After the agitation protocols, significant reduction in bacterial load was demonstrated for all groups (P<0.05). However, no differences were shown among Easy Clean®, PUI and SI (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that all tested groups exhibited similar disinfection effectiveness. However, none of them was able to render all root canals free from microorganisms.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 Easy Clean®、被动超声冲洗和超声冲洗对椭圆形根管中粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌效果。

方法

选择 55 颗具有相似尺寸的人离体牙。制备开髓腔,使用 Wave One®初级锉(25.08)预备根管。随后,通过孵育 30 天使根管受到粪肠球菌悬浮液污染。受污染的根部分为三组实验(每组 n=15),根据冲洗剂搅拌方案(Easy Clean、被动超声冲洗和超声冲洗)进行分组,另外还有阳性对照组(n=5)和阴性对照组(n=5)。在器械预备前(S1)、器械预备后(S2)和最终冲洗方案后(S3)从根管中采集微生物样本。将样本进行检测并孵育 48 小时,以获得粪肠球菌细胞的残留滴度。通过菌落形成单位(CFU)测量来量化活细胞。收集的数据通过 Shapiro-Wilk`s 检验、Wilcoxon 配对检验、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Dunn 事后检验进行统计分析。显著性水平设定为 5%。

结果

所有实验组在器械预备后细菌负荷均显著降低(P<0.05),且组间降低幅度相似。在搅拌方案后,所有组的细菌负荷均显著降低(P<0.05)。然而,Easy Clean®、PUI 和 SI 之间没有差异(P>0.05)。

结论

结果表明,所有测试组均显示出相似的消毒效果。然而,没有一组能够使所有根管内无微生物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验