Johnson Ilona G, Jones Rhiannon J, Gallagher Jennifer E, Wade William G, Al-Yaseen Waraf, Robertson Mark, McGregor Scott, K C Sukriti, Innes Nicola, Harris Rebecca
Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Applied Clinical Research and Public Health, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Dental Education, Scholarship & Innovation, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
BDJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;7(1):15. doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00070-9.
The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant effect on the delivery of routine dentistry; and in particular, periodontal care across the world. This systematic review examines the literature relating to splatter, droplet settle and aerosol for periodontal procedures and forms part of a wider body of research to understand the risk of contamination in relation to periodontal care procedures relevant to COVID-19.
A search of the literature was carried out using key terms and MeSH words relating to the review questions. Sources included Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS, ClinicalTrials.Gov . Studies meeting inclusion criteria were screened in duplicate and data extraction was carried out using a template. All studies were assessed for methodological quality and sensitivity. Narrative synthesis was undertaken.
Fifty studies were included in the review with procedures including ultrasonic scaling (n = 44), air polishing (n = 4), prophylaxis (n = 2) and hand scaling (n = 3). Outcomes included bacterial (colony-forming units e.g. on settle plates) or blood contamination (e.g. visible splatter) and non bacterial, non blood (e.g. chemiluminescence or coloured dyes) contamination. All studies found contamination at all sites although the contamination associated with hand scaling was very low. Contamination was identified in all of the studies even where suction was used at baseline. Higher power settings created greater contamination. Distribution of contamination varied in relation to operator position and was found on the operator, patient and assistant with higher levels around the head of the operator and the mouth and chest of the patient. Settle was identified 30 min after treatments had finished but returned to background levels when measured at or after an hour. The evidence was generally low to medium quality and likely to underestimate contamination.
Ultrasonic scaling, air polishing and prophylaxis procedures produce contamination (splatter, droplets and aerosol) in the presence of suction, with a small amount of evidence showing droplets taking between 30 min and 1 h to settle. Consideration should be given to infection control, areas of cleaning particularly around the patient and appropriate personal protective equipment, with particular attention to respiratory, facial and body protection for these procedures. In addition, the use of lower power settings should be considered to reduce the amount and spread of contamination.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的出现及随后的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行对常规牙科治疗的开展产生了重大影响;尤其是对全球范围内的牙周护理。本系统评价对与牙周治疗中的飞沫、液滴沉降和气溶胶相关的文献进行了审查,是更广泛研究的一部分,旨在了解与COVID-19相关的牙周护理程序中的污染风险。
使用与审查问题相关的关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)对文献进行检索。来源包括医学期刊数据库(Medline,OVID平台)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase,OVID平台)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Scopus数据库、科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(LILACS)以及ClinicalTrials.Gov。对符合纳入标准的研究进行双人筛选,并使用模板进行数据提取。对所有研究进行方法学质量和敏感性评估。进行叙述性综合分析。
本评价纳入了50项研究,涉及的治疗程序包括超声洁治(n = 44)、喷砂(n = 4)、预防性洁治(n = 2)和手工洁治(n = 3)。结果包括细菌污染(如沉降平板上的菌落形成单位)或血液污染(如可见飞沫)以及非细菌、非血液污染(如化学发光或有色染料)。所有研究均在所有部位发现了污染,尽管与手工洁治相关的污染非常低。即使在基线时使用了吸引装置,所有研究中仍发现了污染。较高的功率设置会产生更大的污染。污染的分布因操作人员位置而异,在操作人员、患者和助手身上均有发现,操作人员头部周围以及患者口腔和胸部周围的污染水平较高。治疗结束后30分钟可检测到沉降,但在1小时或1小时后测量时已恢复到背景水平。证据质量一般为低到中等,可能低估了污染情况。
在使用吸引装置的情况下,超声洁治、喷砂和预防性洁治程序会产生污染(飞沫、液滴和气溶胶),少量证据表明液滴需要30分钟至1小时才能沉降。应考虑感染控制、清洁区域,特别是患者周围区域以及适当的个人防护设备,尤其要注意这些操作中对呼吸道、面部和身体的防护。此外,应考虑使用较低的功率设置以减少污染量和污染传播。