• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机规律的编码是由动作-效应预测促进的。

The encoding of stochastic regularities is facilitated by action-effect predictions.

机构信息

Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology - Wilhelm Wundt, Leipzig University, Neumarkt 9-19, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.

Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86095-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-86095-4
Abstract

Our brains continuously build and update predictive models of the world, sources of prediction being drawn for example from sensory regularities and/or our own actions. Yet, recent results in the auditory system indicate that stochastic regularities may not be easily encoded when a rare medium pitch deviant is presented between frequent high and low pitch standard sounds in random order, as reflected in the lack of sensory prediction error event-related potentials [i.e., mismatch negativity (MMN)]. We wanted to test the implication of the predictive coding theory that predictions based on higher-order generative models-here, based on action intention, are fed top-down in the hierarchy to sensory levels. Participants produced random sequences of high and low pitch sounds by button presses in two conditions: In a "specific" condition, one button produced high and the other low pitch sounds; in an "unspecific" condition, both buttons randomly produced high or low-pitch sounds. Rare medium pitch deviants elicited larger MMN and N2 responses in the "specific" compared to the "unspecific" condition, despite equal sound probabilities. These results thus demonstrate that action-effect predictions can boost stochastic regularity-based predictions and engage higher-order deviance detection processes, extending previous notions on the role of action predictions at sensory levels.

摘要

我们的大脑不断构建和更新对世界的预测模型,预测的来源例如可以来自感官规律和/或我们自己的行为。然而,最近在听觉系统中的结果表明,当在随机顺序中呈现罕见的中频偏差时,例如在随机顺序中呈现罕见的中频偏差时,随机规律可能不容易被编码,这反映在缺乏感官预测错误事件相关电位[即失匹配负波(MMN)]中。我们想测试预测编码理论的含义,即基于更高阶生成模型的预测 - 在这里,基于动作意图,自上而下地在层次结构中传递到感觉水平。参与者通过按钮按下在两种条件下产生随机的高和低音序列:在“特定”条件下,一个按钮产生高音,另一个按钮产生低音;在“非特定”条件下,两个按钮随机产生高音或低音。与“非特定”条件相比,“特定”条件下罕见的中频偏差会引起更大的 MMN 和 N2 反应,尽管声音概率相等。因此,这些结果表明,动作效果预测可以增强基于随机规律的预测,并参与更高阶的偏差检测过程,扩展了关于动作预测在感觉水平上作用的先前概念。

相似文献

1
The encoding of stochastic regularities is facilitated by action-effect predictions.随机规律的编码是由动作-效应预测促进的。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86095-4.
2
Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.在听觉偏差检测中,转换概率优先于刺激/模式概率:预测性声音处理的记忆基础。
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 14;36(37):9572-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1041-16.2016.
3
Encoding of deterministic and stochastic auditory rules in the human brain: The mismatch negativity mechanism does not reflect basic probability.人类大脑中确定性和随机性听觉规则的编码:失匹配负波机制不反映基本概率。
Hear Res. 2021 Jan;399:107907. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107907. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Deviants violating higher-order auditory regularities can become predictive and facilitate behaviour.违反高阶听觉规律的偏差者可以变得具有预测性,并促进行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2731-2750. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02763-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
5
Intention-based predictive information modulates auditory deviance processing.基于意图的预测信息调节听觉偏差处理。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;16:995119. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.995119. eCollection 2022.
6
First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.第一印象偏差对听觉空间偏离刺激的失匹配负波的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Apr;55(4). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13013. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
The human brain maintains contradictory and redundant auditory sensory predictions.人类大脑维持着相互矛盾和冗余的听觉感觉预测。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053634. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
The sound of silence: Predictive error responses to unexpected sound omission in adults.寂静之声:成年人对意外声音缺失的预测误差反应
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Apr;55(8):1972-1985. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15660. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
9
Action Intention-based and Stimulus Regularity-based Predictions: Same or Different?基于动作意图的预测和基于刺激规律的预测:相同还是不同?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1917-1932. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01456. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system.差异偏差概率对听觉新奇系统两个层次水平的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2016 Oct;120:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of sensory attenuation in the somatosensory domain using EEG in a novel virtual reality paradigm.在一种新型虚拟现实范式中使用脑电图对体感领域的感觉衰减进行研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87244-9.
2
Markov chains as a proxy for the predictive memory representations underlying mismatch negativity.马尔可夫链作为失配负波潜在预测记忆表征的替代物。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Sep 13;17:1249413. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1249413. eCollection 2023.
3
The auditory brain in action: Intention determines predictive processing in the auditory system-A review of current paradigms and findings.

本文引用的文献

1
What exactly is missing here? The sensory processing of unpredictable omissions is modulated by the specificity of expected action-effects.这里到底缺少了什么?不可预测遗漏的感觉处理是由预期动作效应的特异性调节的。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Dec;52(12):4667-4683. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14899. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
2
Action Intention-based and Stimulus Regularity-based Predictions: Same or Different?基于动作意图的预测和基于刺激规律的预测:相同还是不同?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1917-1932. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01456. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Prediction mechanisms in motor and auditory areas and their role in sound perception and language understanding.
听觉大脑的活动:意图决定听觉系统的预测加工——当前范式和发现的综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):321-342. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01992-z. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
运动和听觉区域中的预测机制及其在声音感知和语言理解中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:206-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.071. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Surprise responses in the human brain demonstrate statistical learning under high concurrent cognitive demand.人类大脑中的惊奇反应表明在高并发认知需求下的统计学习。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2016 Jun 8;1:16006. doi: 10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.6. eCollection 2016.
5
Event-related brain potentials to self-triggered tones: Impact of action type and impulsivity traits.与自我触发音相关的脑电波:行为类型和冲动特质的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 4;125:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Direct Evidence for Prediction Signals in Frontal Cortex Independent of Prediction Error.前额皮质中独立于预测误差的预测信号的直接证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(11):4530-4538. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy331.
7
Predicted sensory consequences of voluntary actions modulate amplitude of preceding readiness potentials.自愿行为的预测感觉后果调节预备电位的幅度。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
The What, the When, and the Whether of Intentional Action in the Brain: A Meta-Analytical Review.大脑中有意行动的内容、时间及是否发生:一项元分析综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 17;11:238. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00238. eCollection 2017.
9
The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis.PREP 流程:用于大规模脑电图分析的标准化预处理
Front Neuroinform. 2015 Jun 18;9:16. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2015.00016. eCollection 2015.
10
On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.关于任务1在PRP双任务研究中的重要性及错误绩效指标
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 7;6:403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00403. eCollection 2015.