Suppr超能文献

随机规律的编码是由动作-效应预测促进的。

The encoding of stochastic regularities is facilitated by action-effect predictions.

作者信息

Korka Betina, Schröger Erich, Widmann Andreas

机构信息

Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology - Wilhelm Wundt, Leipzig University, Neumarkt 9-19, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.

Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86095-4.

Abstract

Our brains continuously build and update predictive models of the world, sources of prediction being drawn for example from sensory regularities and/or our own actions. Yet, recent results in the auditory system indicate that stochastic regularities may not be easily encoded when a rare medium pitch deviant is presented between frequent high and low pitch standard sounds in random order, as reflected in the lack of sensory prediction error event-related potentials [i.e., mismatch negativity (MMN)]. We wanted to test the implication of the predictive coding theory that predictions based on higher-order generative models-here, based on action intention, are fed top-down in the hierarchy to sensory levels. Participants produced random sequences of high and low pitch sounds by button presses in two conditions: In a "specific" condition, one button produced high and the other low pitch sounds; in an "unspecific" condition, both buttons randomly produced high or low-pitch sounds. Rare medium pitch deviants elicited larger MMN and N2 responses in the "specific" compared to the "unspecific" condition, despite equal sound probabilities. These results thus demonstrate that action-effect predictions can boost stochastic regularity-based predictions and engage higher-order deviance detection processes, extending previous notions on the role of action predictions at sensory levels.

摘要

我们的大脑不断构建和更新对世界的预测模型,预测的来源例如可以来自感官规律和/或我们自己的行为。然而,最近在听觉系统中的结果表明,当在随机顺序中呈现罕见的中频偏差时,例如在随机顺序中呈现罕见的中频偏差时,随机规律可能不容易被编码,这反映在缺乏感官预测错误事件相关电位[即失匹配负波(MMN)]中。我们想测试预测编码理论的含义,即基于更高阶生成模型的预测 - 在这里,基于动作意图,自上而下地在层次结构中传递到感觉水平。参与者通过按钮按下在两种条件下产生随机的高和低音序列:在“特定”条件下,一个按钮产生高音,另一个按钮产生低音;在“非特定”条件下,两个按钮随机产生高音或低音。与“非特定”条件相比,“特定”条件下罕见的中频偏差会引起更大的 MMN 和 N2 反应,尽管声音概率相等。因此,这些结果表明,动作效果预测可以增强基于随机规律的预测,并参与更高阶的偏差检测过程,扩展了关于动作预测在感觉水平上作用的先前概念。

相似文献

4
Deviants violating higher-order auditory regularities can become predictive and facilitate behaviour.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2731-2750. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02763-9. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
5
Intention-based predictive information modulates auditory deviance processing.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;16:995119. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.995119. eCollection 2022.
6
First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
Psychophysiology. 2018 Apr;55(4). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13013. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
The human brain maintains contradictory and redundant auditory sensory predictions.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053634. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
The sound of silence: Predictive error responses to unexpected sound omission in adults.
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Apr;55(8):1972-1985. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15660. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
9
Action Intention-based and Stimulus Regularity-based Predictions: Same or Different?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1917-1932. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01456. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system.
Biol Psychol. 2016 Oct;120:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

2
Markov chains as a proxy for the predictive memory representations underlying mismatch negativity.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Sep 13;17:1249413. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1249413. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

2
Action Intention-based and Stimulus Regularity-based Predictions: Same or Different?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1917-1932. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01456. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Prediction mechanisms in motor and auditory areas and their role in sound perception and language understanding.
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:206-216. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.071. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Surprise responses in the human brain demonstrate statistical learning under high concurrent cognitive demand.
NPJ Sci Learn. 2016 Jun 8;1:16006. doi: 10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.6. eCollection 2016.
5
Event-related brain potentials to self-triggered tones: Impact of action type and impulsivity traits.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 4;125:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Direct Evidence for Prediction Signals in Frontal Cortex Independent of Prediction Error.
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(11):4530-4538. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy331.
7
Predicted sensory consequences of voluntary actions modulate amplitude of preceding readiness potentials.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
The What, the When, and the Whether of Intentional Action in the Brain: A Meta-Analytical Review.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 17;11:238. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00238. eCollection 2017.
9
The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis.
Front Neuroinform. 2015 Jun 18;9:16. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2015.00016. eCollection 2015.
10
On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 7;6:403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00403. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验