• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非裔美国残疾人使用辅助技术的障碍:文献与政策综述

Assistive Technology Access and Usage Barriers Among African Americans With Disabilities: A Review of the Literature and Policy.

作者信息

Ward-Sutton Courtney, Williams Natalie F, Moore Corey L, Manyibe Edward O

机构信息

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma; Independent Researcher, Oklahoma, USA.

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma.

出版信息

J Appl Rehabil Couns. 2020;51(2):115-133.

PMID:33762779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7985985/
Abstract

The purpose of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the available peer-reviewed and gray literature on assistive technology (AT) access and usage barriers among African Americans with disabilities. Authors completed a historical review (Onwuegbuzie & Frels, 2016) of the extant literature on AT and disability public policy mandates by framing the context on AT access and usage disparities among African Americans with disabilities and discussing AT impacts on employment for African Americans. The authors also presented recommendations that might be considered by the field for increasing AT access and usage among African Americans with disabilities. It is clear that AT and associated assistive products are important commodities to the lives of individuals with disabilities in the United States; however, there are historical inequities between African Americans and Whites. As a result of these findings, the authors implore rehabilitation counselors in education and practice to further examine ways to alleviate the AT access and usage gaps for African Americans with disabilities within public policy, vocational rehabilitation service delivery, and institutional infrastructure systems.

摘要

本文旨在全面概述有关非裔美国残疾人士辅助技术(AT)获取与使用障碍的同行评审文献和灰色文献。作者通过阐述非裔美国残疾人士在AT获取与使用方面的差距背景,并讨论AT对非裔美国人就业的影响,对现有关于AT和残疾公共政策指令的文献进行了历史回顾(Onwuegbuzie & Frels,2016)。作者还提出了该领域可考虑的建议,以增加非裔美国残疾人士对AT的获取与使用。显然,AT及相关辅助产品对美国残疾人士的生活至关重要;然而,非裔美国人和白人之间存在历史上的不平等。基于这些研究结果,作者恳请教育和实践领域的康复顾问进一步研究如何在公共政策、职业康复服务提供和机构基础设施系统中,缩小非裔美国残疾人士在AT获取与使用方面的差距。

相似文献

1
Assistive Technology Access and Usage Barriers Among African Americans With Disabilities: A Review of the Literature and Policy.非裔美国残疾人使用辅助技术的障碍:文献与政策综述
J Appl Rehabil Couns. 2020;51(2):115-133.
2
Assistive technology services for adults with disabilities in state-federal vocational rehabilitation programs.为州联邦职业康复项目中的残疾成年人提供辅助技术服务。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1382-1391. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2181413. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
Marginalized voices: a qualitative exploration of multilevel environmental barriers to assistive technology use among hispanics.边缘化的声音:对西班牙裔人群使用辅助技术的多层次环境障碍的定性探索
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Feb;20(2):476-487. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Assistive technology and veterans with severe disabilities: examining the relationships among race, personal factors, medical support, income support, and use.辅助技术与严重残疾退伍军人:研究种族、个人因素、医疗支持、收入支持与使用之间的关系。
Med Care. 2014 Oct;52(10 Suppl 3):S17-24. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000105.
5
Assistive technology policy: a road to independence for individuals with disabilities.辅助技术政策:通往残疾人独立之路
J Soc Issues. 1993 Summer;49(2):115-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00923.x.
6
The demand for assistive technology, services, and satisfaction self-reports among people with disabilities in China.中国残疾人对辅助技术、服务及满意度自我报告的需求。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jul;20(5):1199-1208. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2442711. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
7
Using assistive technology outcomes research to inform policy related to the employment of individuals with disabilities.利用辅助技术成果研究为与残疾人就业相关的政策提供信息。
Assist Technol. 2008 Fall;20(3):139-48. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131941.
8
Bridging the gap: challenges and opportunities of assistive technology loan library systems for individuals with intellectual disabilities in the United States.缩小差距:美国智障人士辅助技术借阅图书馆系统面临的挑战与机遇
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr;20(3):611-620. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2400997. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
10
Are there differences in factors influencing access and continued use of assistive products for people with intellectual disabilities living in group homes?对于居住在集体之家的智障人士而言,影响他们获取和持续使用辅助产品的因素是否存在差异?
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Feb;15(2):173-182. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1550116. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology access, use, socioeconomic status, and healthcare disparities among African Americans in the US.美国非裔美国人在技术获取、使用、社会经济地位及医疗保健差异方面的情况。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 28;13:1547189. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547189. eCollection 2025.
2
Assistive Technology Workplace Accommodation and Employment among Diverse Populations with Disabilities: Does Race/Ethnicity Matter?不同残疾人群体中的辅助技术工作场所便利措施与就业:种族/民族有影响吗?
J Rehabil. 2022;88(1):23-25.
3
Assistive Technology's Potential to Improve Employment of People with Disabilities.辅助技术改善残疾人就业的潜力。
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jun;34(2):299-315. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10164-w. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
We still cannot breathe: Applying intersectional ecological model to COVID-19 survivorship.我们仍然无法呼吸:将交叉生态模型应用于 COVID-19 幸存者。
Rehabil Psychol. 2023 May;68(2):112-120. doi: 10.1037/rep0000495.
5
Technology for Adults with Intellectual Disability: Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.智力残疾成年人技术:范围综述的二次分析。
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Dec;90(4):395-404. doi: 10.1177/00084174231160975. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Co-curricular Immersion as a Public-Private Capacity Building Activity.作为公私部门能力建设活动的课外沉浸式体验
Biomed Eng Educ. 2023 Jan 17:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s43683-022-00098-9.
7
SETT: A Framework for Capacity Building Partnerships.SETT:能力建设伙伴关系框架
Proc North Cent Sect. 2022;2022. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Correcting misinformation by health organizations during measles outbreaks: A controlled experiment.在麻疹疫情期间,卫生组织纠正错误信息:一项对照实验。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0209505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209505. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators.为智力残疾人士提供辅助技术的途径:一项系统评价,旨在确定障碍和促进因素。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Oct;62(10):900-921. doi: 10.1111/jir.12532. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Rehabilitation technology services and employment outcomes among consumers using division of rehabilitation services.使用康复服务部门的消费者的康复技术服务与就业成果
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Jul;14(5):445-452. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1463400. Epub 2018 May 3.
3
Assistive technology access and service delivery in resource-limited environments: introduction to a special issue of Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.资源有限环境下的辅助技术获取与服务提供:《残疾与康复:辅助技术》特刊引言
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Jul;10(4):267-70. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1039607. Epub 2015 May 8.
4
Assistive technology and veterans with severe disabilities: examining the relationships among race, personal factors, medical support, income support, and use.辅助技术与严重残疾退伍军人:研究种族、个人因素、医疗支持、收入支持与使用之间的关系。
Med Care. 2014 Oct;52(10 Suppl 3):S17-24. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000105.
5
Problems, policies and politics: making the case for better assistive technology provision in Australia.问题、政策与政治:为澳大利亚提供更好的辅助技术进行论证
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 May;10(3):240-4. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.889229. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Utilization of assistive technology by persons with physical disabilities: an examination of predictive factors by race.身体残疾者对辅助技术的使用:按种族对预测因素的考察。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Nov;9(6):487-92. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.836683. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Assistive technology use and human rights enjoyment: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh.辅助技术的使用与享有人权:孟加拉国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 Sep 19;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-18.
8
Assistive technology funding in the United States.美国的辅助技术资金
NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(3):295-302. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0657.
9
The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology.文化、残疾与辅助技术的交叉点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(2):87-96. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.507859. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
10
Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities.残疾人辅助技术使用方面的差异。
Assist Technol. 2008 Winter;20(4):194-203. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131946.