Suppr超能文献

非裔美国残疾人使用辅助技术的障碍:文献与政策综述

Assistive Technology Access and Usage Barriers Among African Americans With Disabilities: A Review of the Literature and Policy.

作者信息

Ward-Sutton Courtney, Williams Natalie F, Moore Corey L, Manyibe Edward O

机构信息

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma; Independent Researcher, Oklahoma, USA.

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma.

出版信息

J Appl Rehabil Couns. 2020;51(2):115-133.

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the available peer-reviewed and gray literature on assistive technology (AT) access and usage barriers among African Americans with disabilities. Authors completed a historical review (Onwuegbuzie & Frels, 2016) of the extant literature on AT and disability public policy mandates by framing the context on AT access and usage disparities among African Americans with disabilities and discussing AT impacts on employment for African Americans. The authors also presented recommendations that might be considered by the field for increasing AT access and usage among African Americans with disabilities. It is clear that AT and associated assistive products are important commodities to the lives of individuals with disabilities in the United States; however, there are historical inequities between African Americans and Whites. As a result of these findings, the authors implore rehabilitation counselors in education and practice to further examine ways to alleviate the AT access and usage gaps for African Americans with disabilities within public policy, vocational rehabilitation service delivery, and institutional infrastructure systems.

摘要

本文旨在全面概述有关非裔美国残疾人士辅助技术(AT)获取与使用障碍的同行评审文献和灰色文献。作者通过阐述非裔美国残疾人士在AT获取与使用方面的差距背景,并讨论AT对非裔美国人就业的影响,对现有关于AT和残疾公共政策指令的文献进行了历史回顾(Onwuegbuzie & Frels,2016)。作者还提出了该领域可考虑的建议,以增加非裔美国残疾人士对AT的获取与使用。显然,AT及相关辅助产品对美国残疾人士的生活至关重要;然而,非裔美国人和白人之间存在历史上的不平等。基于这些研究结果,作者恳请教育和实践领域的康复顾问进一步研究如何在公共政策、职业康复服务提供和机构基础设施系统中,缩小非裔美国残疾人士在AT获取与使用方面的差距。

相似文献

2
Assistive technology services for adults with disabilities in state-federal vocational rehabilitation programs.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1382-1391. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2181413. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
Marginalized voices: a qualitative exploration of multilevel environmental barriers to assistive technology use among hispanics.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Feb;20(2):476-487. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2392852. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
5
Assistive technology policy: a road to independence for individuals with disabilities.
J Soc Issues. 1993 Summer;49(2):115-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00923.x.
6
The demand for assistive technology, services, and satisfaction self-reports among people with disabilities in China.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jul;20(5):1199-1208. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2442711. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
8
Bridging the gap: challenges and opportunities of assistive technology loan library systems for individuals with intellectual disabilities in the United States.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr;20(3):611-620. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2400997. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
10
Are there differences in factors influencing access and continued use of assistive products for people with intellectual disabilities living in group homes?
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Feb;15(2):173-182. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1550116. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology access, use, socioeconomic status, and healthcare disparities among African Americans in the US.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 28;13:1547189. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547189. eCollection 2025.
3
Assistive Technology's Potential to Improve Employment of People with Disabilities.
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jun;34(2):299-315. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10164-w. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
We still cannot breathe: Applying intersectional ecological model to COVID-19 survivorship.
Rehabil Psychol. 2023 May;68(2):112-120. doi: 10.1037/rep0000495.
5
Technology for Adults with Intellectual Disability: Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Dec;90(4):395-404. doi: 10.1177/00084174231160975. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Co-curricular Immersion as a Public-Private Capacity Building Activity.
Biomed Eng Educ. 2023 Jan 17:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s43683-022-00098-9.
7
SETT: A Framework for Capacity Building Partnerships.
Proc North Cent Sect. 2022;2022. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Correcting misinformation by health organizations during measles outbreaks: A controlled experiment.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0209505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209505. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Oct;62(10):900-921. doi: 10.1111/jir.12532. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
2
Rehabilitation technology services and employment outcomes among consumers using division of rehabilitation services.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Jul;14(5):445-452. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1463400. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Problems, policies and politics: making the case for better assistive technology provision in Australia.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 May;10(3):240-4. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.889229. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Utilization of assistive technology by persons with physical disabilities: an examination of predictive factors by race.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Nov;9(6):487-92. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.836683. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Assistive technology use and human rights enjoyment: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 Sep 19;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-12-18.
8
Assistive technology funding in the United States.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(3):295-302. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0657.
9
The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(2):87-96. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.507859. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
10
Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities.
Assist Technol. 2008 Winter;20(4):194-203. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131946.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验