• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用少于50个项目评估16种基本动机:德国16种动机研究量表(16mrs)的编制与验证

Assessing 16 Fundamental Motives With Fewer Than 50 Items: Development and Validation of the German 16 Motives Research Scales (16mrs).

作者信息

Dörendahl Jan, Greiff Samuel, Niepel Christoph

机构信息

Cognitive Science & Assessment, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 8;12:562371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562371. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562371
PMID:33762987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7982535/
Abstract

Psychometrically sound short scales are required to comprehensively and yet economically assess fundamental motives in research settings such as large-scale assessments. In order to provide such a time- and cost-efficient instrument, we conducted three studies ( = 1,568) to develop further and validate 16 German scales with three items each assessing fundamental motives [16 motives research scales (16mrs)]. In Study 1, we applied a top-down construction process to develop a preliminary item pool on the basis of a thorough revision of existing construct definitions. In Study 2, we chose an approach that allowed us to balance the optimization of psychometric properties with content coverage to select three-item scales for each of the 16 motives. For the item selection process, we combined exploratory factor analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, ant colony optimization algorithm, and Mokken scale analyses. In Study 3, we cross-validated the results obtained in Study 2 and placed the 16mrs in a nomological network consisting of Big Five traits and Power, Achievement, Affiliation, Intimacy, and Fear motives. The results of these studies indicate that the 16mrs can be used to reliably and validly assess fundamental motives that represent a level of personality that differs from the Big Five and covers motivational aspects beyond the well-established Power, Achievement, Affiliation, Intimacy, and Fear motives. Limitations concerning the reliability of the Autonomy scale and the empirical discrimination of the Dominance and Status scales are discussed. In addition to the validated German version, we also provide the English translation of the items, which, however, need to be validated before use.

摘要

在大规模评估等研究环境中,需要心理测量学上可靠的简短量表来全面且经济地评估基本动机。为了提供这样一种节省时间和成本的工具,我们进行了三项研究(N = 1568),以进一步开发并验证16个德语量表,每个量表有三个项目,用于评估基本动机[16个动机研究量表(16mrs)]。在研究1中,我们采用自上而下的构建过程,在对现有构念定义进行全面修订的基础上,开发一个初步的项目池。在研究2中,我们选择了一种方法,使我们能够在心理测量学特性的优化与内容覆盖之间取得平衡,为16种动机中的每一种选择三个项目的量表。对于项目选择过程,我们结合了探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、蚁群优化算法和莫肯量表分析。在研究3中,我们对研究2中获得的结果进行了交叉验证,并将16mrs置于一个由大五人格特质以及权力、成就、归属、亲密和恐惧动机组成的法则网络中。这些研究结果表明,16mrs可用于可靠且有效地评估基本动机,这些动机代表了一种不同于大五人格的人格水平,并且涵盖了超越既定的权力、成就、归属、亲密和恐惧动机的动机方面。我们讨论了自主量表的可靠性以及支配和地位量表的实证区分方面的局限性。除了经过验证的德语版本外,我们还提供了项目的英文翻译,不过在使用前需要进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2616/7982535/4898841da824/fpsyg-12-562371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2616/7982535/4898841da824/fpsyg-12-562371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2616/7982535/4898841da824/fpsyg-12-562371-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing 16 Fundamental Motives With Fewer Than 50 Items: Development and Validation of the German 16 Motives Research Scales (16mrs).用少于50个项目评估16种基本动机:德国16种动机研究量表(16mrs)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 8;12:562371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562371. eCollection 2021.
2
Developing Cross-Cultural Short Scales Using Ant Colony Optimization.利用蚁群优化算法开发跨文化短量表。
Assessment. 2021 Jan;28(1):199-210. doi: 10.1177/1073191120918026. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG).同时评估成就动机、亲和动机和权力动机:多重动机网格(MMG)。
J Pers Assess. 2000 Feb;74(1):126-45. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA740109.
4
Individual differences in fundamental social motives.基本社会动机的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jun;110(6):887-907. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000068. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
5
Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, power, and affiliation onto the five-factor model of personality.将成就、权力和归属的明确社会动机映射到五因素人格模型上。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Aug;51(4):309-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00773.x. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
6
Personality traits and achievement motives: theoretical and empirical relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale.人格特质与成就动机:修订版大五人格量表与成就动机量表之间的理论与实证关系
Psychol Rep. 2009 Apr;104(2):579-92. doi: 10.2466/pr0.104.2.579-592.
7
[French version of TASTE (test for the ability and evaluation)].[TASTE(能力与评估测试)的法语版本]
Encephale. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):527-38.
8
Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.社交焦虑与对负面评价的恐惧:BFNE-II的结构效度
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 3.
9
Development and validation of the Amsterdam Motives for Drinking Scale (AMDS): an attempt to distinguish relief and reward drinkers.阿姆斯特丹饮酒动机量表(AMDS)的编制与验证:区分缓解型和奖励型饮酒者的尝试。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2006 May-Jun;41(3):284-92. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agl012. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
10
Relations between big five traits and fundamental motives.大五人格特质与基本动机之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):795-802. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.3.795-802.

本文引用的文献

1
The Development and Validation of Brief and Ultrabrief Measures of Values.价值观简短及超简短测量方法的开发与验证
J Pers Assess. 2017 Sep-Oct;99(5):545-555. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1231115. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
2
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings.
“眼神读心术”测试的心理测量分析:开发适用于研究和应用场景的简短版本
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 6;6:1503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01503. eCollection 2015.
4
When "together" means "too close": Agency motives and relationship functioning in coresident and living-apart-together couples.当“在一起”意味着“过于亲密”时:同住与分居共住夫妻中的机构动机与关系功能。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Nov;109(5):813-35. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000031. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
5
The indirect nature of social motives: the relation of social approach and avoidance motives with likeability via extraversion and agreeableness.社会动机的间接性:外向性和宜人性通过社交趋近和回避动机与喜爱度的关系。
J Pers. 2015 Feb;83(1):97-105. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12086. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
6
Participant dropout as a function of survey length in internet-mediated university studies: implications for study design and voluntary participation in psychological research.参与者流失作为互联网介导的大学研究中调查长度的函数:对研究设计和心理研究中自愿参与的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Dec;13(6):697-700. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0445. Epub 2010 May 11.
7
Personality development: continuity and change over the life course.人格发展:毕生的连续性和变化。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:517-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507.
8
Things I've learned about personality from studying political leaders at a distance.我通过远距离研究政治领袖所学到的关于性格的知识。
J Pers. 2005 Jun;73(3):557-84; discussion 553-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00321.x.
9
Relations between big five traits and fundamental motives.大五人格特质与基本动机之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):795-802. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.3.795-802.
10
Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?临床试验中的邮件随访:问卷长度重要吗?
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):31-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013.