Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Dec;13(6):697-700. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0445. Epub 2010 May 11.
Internet-mediated research has offered substantial advantages over traditional laboratory-based research in terms of efficiently and affordably allowing for the recruitment of large samples of participants for psychology studies. Core technical, ethical, and methodological issues have been addressed in recent years, but the important issue of participant dropout has received surprisingly little attention. Specifically, web-based psychology studies often involve undergraduates completing lengthy and time-consuming batteries of online personality questionnaires, but no known published studies to date have closely examined the natural course of participant dropout during attempted completion of these studies. The present investigation examined participant dropout among 1,963 undergraduates completing one of six web-based survey studies relatively representative of those conducted in university settings. Results indicated that 10% of participants could be expected to drop out of these studies nearly instantaneously, with an additional 2% dropping out per 100 survey items included in the study. For individual project investigators, these findings hold ramifications for study design considerations, such as conducting a priori power analyses. The present results also have broader ethical implications for understanding and improving voluntary participation in research involving human subjects. Nonetheless, the generalizability of these conclusions may be limited to studies involving similar design or survey content.
互联网介导的研究在心理学研究中具有显著的优势,能够高效且经济地招募大量参与者。近年来,已经解决了核心技术、伦理和方法学问题,但参与者流失这一重要问题却出人意料地没有得到太多关注。具体来说,基于网络的心理学研究通常涉及大学生完成冗长且耗时的在线人格问卷,但迄今为止,没有已知的已发表研究密切检查这些研究中参与者试图完成时的自然流失过程。本研究调查了 1963 名大学生在完成六个基于网络的调查研究之一时的参与者流失情况,这些研究在大学环境中进行的研究中具有代表性。结果表明,预计有 10%的参与者几乎会立即退出这些研究,而每增加 100 项研究项目,就会有另外 2%的参与者退出。对于个别项目研究人员来说,这些发现对研究设计考虑因素具有重要意义,例如进行事先的功效分析。本研究结果还对理解和改善涉及人类受试者的自愿参与研究具有更广泛的伦理意义。尽管如此,这些结论的普遍性可能仅限于涉及类似设计或调查内容的研究。