National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Department of Perioperative Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 8;12:548469. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.548469. eCollection 2021.
Detecting autoantibodies provides foundational information for the diagnosis of most autoimmune diseases. An important pathophysiological distinction is whether autoantibodies are directed against extracellular or intracellular proteins. Autoantibodies targeting extracellular domains of proteins, such as membrane receptors, channels or secreted molecules are often directly pathogenic, whereby autoantibody binding to the autoantigen disrupts the normal function of a critical protein or pathway, and/or triggers antibody-dependent cell surface complement killing. By comparison, autoantibodies directed against intracellular proteins are recognized as useful diagnostic biomarkers of abnormal autoimmune activity, but the link between antigenicity and pathogenicity is less straightforward. Because intracellular autoantigens are generally inaccessible to autoantibody binding, for the most part, they do not directly contribute to pathogenesis. In a few diseases, autoantibodies to intracellular targets cause damage indirectly by immune complex formation, immune activation, and other processes. In this review, the general features of and differences between autoimmune diseases segregated on the basis of intracellular or extracellular autoantigens are explored using over twenty examples. Expression profiles of autoantigens in relation to the tissues targeted by autoimmune disease and the temporal appearance of autoantibodies before clinical diagnosis often correlate with whether the respective autoantibodies mostly recognize either intracellular or extracellular autoantigens. In addition, current therapeutic strategies are discussed from this vantage point. One drug, rituximab, depletes CD20+ B-cells and is highly effective for autoimmune disorders associated with autoantibodies against extracellular autoantigens. In contrast, diseases associated with autoantibodies directed predominately against intracellular autoantigens show much more complex immune cell involvement, such as T-cell mediated tissue damage, and require different strategies for optimal therapeutic benefit. Understanding the clinical ramifications of autoimmunity derived by autoantibodies against either intracellular or extracellular autoantigens, or a spectrum of both, has practical implications for guiding drug development, generating monitoring tools, stratification of patient interventions, and designing trials based on predictive autoantibody profiles for autoimmune diseases.
自身抗体的检测为大多数自身免疫性疾病的诊断提供了基础信息。一个重要的病理生理学区别是自身抗体是针对细胞外还是细胞内蛋白。针对蛋白质细胞外结构域的自身抗体,如膜受体、通道或分泌分子,通常具有直接致病性,即自身抗体与自身抗原结合会破坏关键蛋白或途径的正常功能,和/或触发抗体依赖性细胞表面补体杀伤。相比之下,针对细胞内蛋白的自身抗体被认为是异常自身免疫活动的有用诊断生物标志物,但抗原性和致病性之间的联系并不那么直接。因为细胞内自身抗原通常无法与自身抗体结合,在大多数情况下,它们不会直接导致发病机制。在少数疾病中,针对细胞内靶标的自身抗体通过免疫复合物形成、免疫激活和其他过程间接引起损伤。在这篇综述中,使用二十多个例子探讨了基于细胞内或细胞外自身抗原对自身免疫性疾病进行分类的一般特征和差异。自身抗原的表达谱与自身免疫性疾病靶向的组织以及临床诊断前自身抗体的出现时间通常与各自的自身抗体主要识别细胞内还是细胞外自身抗原有关。此外,还从这个角度讨论了当前的治疗策略。一种药物,利妥昔单抗,可耗竭 CD20+B 细胞,对与针对细胞外自身抗原的自身抗体相关的自身免疫性疾病非常有效。相比之下,与主要针对细胞内自身抗原的自身抗体相关的疾病表现出更复杂的免疫细胞参与,如 T 细胞介导的组织损伤,需要不同的策略来获得最佳的治疗效果。了解针对细胞内或细胞外自身抗原或两者谱的自身抗体引起的自身免疫的临床后果,对于指导药物开发、产生监测工具、分层患者干预以及基于自身抗体预测谱设计自身免疫性疾病试验具有实际意义。