Deakin Health Economics, Global Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Obes Rev. 2021 Jul;22(7):e13227. doi: 10.1111/obr.13227. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Obesity prevention interventions with behavioral or lifestyle-related components delivered via web-based or telephone technologies have been reported as comparatively low cost as compared with other intervention delivery modes, yet to date, no synthesized evidence of cost-effectiveness has been published. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of economic evaluations of obesity prevention interventions with a telehealth or eHealth intervention component. A systematic search of six academic databases was conducted through October 2020. Studies were included if they reported full economic evaluations of interventions aimed at preventing overweight or obesity, or interventions aimed at improving obesity-related behaviors, with at least one intervention component delivered by telephone (telehealth) or web-based technology (eHealth). Findings were reported narratively, based on the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. Twenty-seven economic evaluations were included from 20 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Sixteen of the included interventions had a telehealth component, whereas 11 had an eHealth component. Seventeen interventions were evaluated using cost-utility analysis, five with cost-effectiveness analysis, and five undertook both cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Only eight cost-utility analyses reported that the intervention was cost-effective. Comparison of results from cost-effectiveness analyses was limited by heterogeneity in methods and outcome units reported. The evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness of interventions with a telehealth or eHealth delivery component is currently inconclusive. Although obesity prevention telehealth and eHealth interventions are gaining popularity, more evidence is required on their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
与基于行为或生活方式的组件的肥胖预防干预措施通过基于网络或电话技术进行的干预措施已被报道为与其他干预措施相比成本相对较低,但迄今为止,尚未发表关于成本效益的综合证据。本研究旨在对具有远程医疗或电子健康干预组件的肥胖预防干预措施进行系统的经济评估。通过 2020 年 10 月对六个学术数据库进行了系统搜索。如果报告了旨在预防超重或肥胖或旨在改善肥胖相关行为的干预措施的完整经济评估,且至少有一个干预措施通过电话(远程医疗)或基于网络的技术(电子健康)提供,则将研究纳入其中。根据综合健康经济评估报告标准,以叙述性方式报告结果。从符合纳入标准的 20 项研究中纳入了 27 项经济评估。包括的干预措施中有 16 项具有远程医疗组件,11 项具有电子健康组件。17 项干预措施采用成本效用分析进行评估,5 项采用成本效果分析,5 项同时进行成本效果和成本效用分析。只有 8 项成本效用分析报告称该干预措施具有成本效益。由于报告的方法和结果单位存在异质性,因此成本效果分析的结果比较受到限制。具有远程医疗或电子健康交付组件的干预措施具有成本效益的证据目前尚无定论。尽管远程医疗和电子健康的肥胖预防干预措施越来越受欢迎,但仍需要更多关于其有效性和成本效益的证据。