• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在导航过程中视觉注意力分配的差异。

Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

School of Behavioural and Social Sciences.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;76(1):10-21. doi: 10.1037/cep0000247. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1037/cep0000247
PMID:33764100
Abstract

Individual differences exist in the ability to create an accurate mental survey representation (i.e., a cognitive map) of a novel environment, yet the mechanisms underlying differences in cognitive map accuracy are still under investigation. To determine whether differences in overt attention allocation contribute to these individual differences, the current study examined whether looking times to landmarks and other objects while navigating in a dynamic virtual environment were related to cognitive map accuracy. Participants completed a battery of spatial tests; some tests assessed spatial skills prior to the navigation task (the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale and the Spatial Orientation Test), and others tested memory of the virtual environment after an exploration period (a landmark recognition task, a direction estimation task, a map-building task, and a route construction task). Individuals with inaccurate cognitive maps of Silcton, as measured by the direction estimation and map-building tasks, showed equivalent eye fixations to buildings and objects when exploring Silcton as those with accurate maps. Despite similar looking times, the inaccurate mappers were significantly worse at judgments of relative direction between landmarks in Silcton and showed poorer memory for landmarks in Silcton than accurate mappers. These findings suggest that cognitive mechanisms, such as mental perspective-taking, occurring after attention allocation underlie differences in cognitive map accuracy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

个体在创建新颖环境的准确心理表象(即认知地图)的能力上存在差异,但认知地图准确性差异的背后机制仍在研究中。为了确定注意力分配的差异是否导致这些个体差异,本研究考察了在动态虚拟环境中导航时对地标和其他物体的注视时间是否与认知地图准确性有关。参与者完成了一系列空间测试;一些测试在导航任务之前评估空间技能(圣巴巴拉方向感量表和空间定向测试),而其他测试则在探索期后测试对虚拟环境的记忆(地标识别任务、方向估计任务、地图绘制任务和路线构建任务)。在方向估计和地图绘制任务中,Silcton 认知地图不准确的个体与准确地图的个体在探索 Silcton 时对建筑物和物体的眼动注视没有区别。尽管注视时间相似,但不准确的映射者在判断 Silcton 地标之间的相对方向以及对 Silcton 地标记忆方面明显差于准确的映射者。这些发现表明,认知机制,如心理视角转换,在注意分配后对认知地图准确性的差异起着重要作用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.个体在导航过程中视觉注意力分配的差异。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;76(1):10-21. doi: 10.1037/cep0000247. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.认知地图准确性的个体差异:探究地标熟悉度的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):37-46. doi: 10.1037/cep0000165.
3
How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.(一些)人是如何制作认知地图的?路线、地点和工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):768-785. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000200. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.言语表达、视觉化与导航:策略对大规模虚拟环境编码的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):611-621. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000314. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.视地图复杂度对地标注意力加工的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229575. eCollection 2020.
6
Age-related similarities and differences in monitoring spatial cognition.与年龄相关的空间认知监测方面的异同。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2018 May;25(3):351-377. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2017.1305086. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.认知地图的差异:理解导航中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):669-682. doi: 10.1037/a0035261. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
8
Evaluating the effects of a programming error on a virtual environment measure of spatial navigation behavior.评估编程错误对空间导航行为虚拟环境测量的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):575-589. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001146. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Longitudinal development of cognitive mapping from childhood to adolescence.从儿童期到青少年期认知图式的纵向发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jul;219:105412. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105412. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Spatial navigation from same and different directions: The role of executive functions, memory and attention in adults with autism spectrum disorder.空间导航来自相同和不同方向:执行功能、记忆和注意力在自闭症谱系障碍成人中的作用。
Autism Res. 2018 May;11(5):798-810. doi: 10.1002/aur.1924. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do In-Car Navigation Aids Impair Expert Navigators' Spatial Learning Ability?车内导航辅助工具如何损害专业导航者的空间学习能力?
Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2024 Jul 1;114(7):1483-1504. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2024.2356858. eCollection 2024.