• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估编程错误对空间导航行为虚拟环境测量的影响。

Evaluating the effects of a programming error on a virtual environment measure of spatial navigation behavior.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Management, Technology, and Economics.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):575-589. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001146. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0001146
PMID:36074604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10714309/
Abstract

Relying on shared tasks and stimuli to conduct research can enhance the replicability of findings and allow a community of researchers to collect large data sets across multiple experiments. This approach is particularly relevant for experiments in spatial navigation, which often require the development of unfamiliar large-scale virtual environments to test participants. One challenge with shared platforms is that undetected technical errors, rather than being restricted to individual studies, become pervasive across many studies. Here, we discuss the discovery of a software bug in a virtual environment platform used to investigate individual differences in spatial navigation: Virtual Silcton. The bug, which was difficult to detect for several reasons, resulted in storing the absolute value of a direction in a pointing task rather than the signed direction and rendered the original sign of the direction unrecoverable. To assess the impact of the bug on published findings, we collected a new data set for comparison. Results revealed that although the bug caused suppression in pointing errors and had different effects across people (less accurate navigators had more suppression), the effect of the bug on published data is small, partially explaining the difficulty in detecting the bug. We also used the new data set to develop a tool that allows researchers who have previously used Virtual Silcton to evaluate the impact of the bug on their findings. We summarize the ways that shared open materials, shared data, and collaboration can pave the way for better science to prevent errors in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

依靠共享任务和刺激物进行研究可以提高研究结果的可重复性,并允许研究人员在多个实验中收集大量数据集。这种方法对于空间导航实验特别有用,因为空间导航实验通常需要开发不熟悉的大规模虚拟环境来测试参与者。共享平台的一个挑战是,未被检测到的技术错误不仅限于个别研究,而是会在许多研究中普遍存在。在这里,我们讨论了在一个用于研究空间导航个体差异的虚拟环境平台 Virtual Silcton 中发现的一个软件错误。这个错误由于多种原因很难被发现,导致在指向任务中存储的是方向的绝对值而不是有符号的方向,并且使方向的原始符号无法恢复。为了评估该错误对已发表研究结果的影响,我们收集了一个新的数据集进行比较。结果表明,尽管该错误导致指向错误减少,并且对不同的人有不同的影响(导航能力较差的人减少更多),但该错误对已发表数据的影响很小,部分解释了难以检测到该错误的原因。我们还使用新数据集开发了一个工具,允许以前使用过 Virtual Silcton 的研究人员评估该错误对他们发现的影响。我们总结了共享开放材料、共享数据和合作可以为未来更好的科学铺平道路,以防止错误的方式。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/e98921bd132b/nihms-1943972-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/db23b5296bf5/nihms-1943972-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/412f49b49597/nihms-1943972-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/cb0124874b5f/nihms-1943972-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/7084f832ffb0/nihms-1943972-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/18a5c7d25fb9/nihms-1943972-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/2b29b1709769/nihms-1943972-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/fc40214fbb82/nihms-1943972-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/9f3fc7b7c5fe/nihms-1943972-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/61c825928f6b/nihms-1943972-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/e98921bd132b/nihms-1943972-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/db23b5296bf5/nihms-1943972-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/412f49b49597/nihms-1943972-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/cb0124874b5f/nihms-1943972-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/7084f832ffb0/nihms-1943972-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/18a5c7d25fb9/nihms-1943972-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/2b29b1709769/nihms-1943972-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/fc40214fbb82/nihms-1943972-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/9f3fc7b7c5fe/nihms-1943972-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/61c825928f6b/nihms-1943972-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f14c/10714309/e98921bd132b/nihms-1943972-f0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the effects of a programming error on a virtual environment measure of spatial navigation behavior.评估编程错误对空间导航行为虚拟环境测量的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Apr;49(4):575-589. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001146. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.个体在导航过程中视觉注意力分配的差异。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;76(1):10-21. doi: 10.1037/cep0000247. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.认知地图准确性的个体差异:探究地标熟悉度的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):37-46. doi: 10.1037/cep0000165.
5
How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.(一些)人是如何制作认知地图的?路线、地点和工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):768-785. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000200. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
A novel virtual-reality-based route-learning test suite: Assessing the effects of cognitive aging on navigation.一种新型基于虚拟现实的路线学习测试套件:评估认知老化对导航的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):630-640. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01264-8.
8
Learning-dependent evolution of spatial representations in large-scale virtual environments.大规模虚拟环境中空间表征的学习依赖型进化
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):497-514. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000597. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
The role of working memory capacity in spatial learning depends on spatial information integration difficulty in the environment.工作记忆容量在空间学习中的作用取决于环境中空间信息整合的难度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):666-685. doi: 10.1037/xge0000972. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
Induction of spatial anxiety in a virtual navigation environment.在虚拟导航环境中诱导空间焦虑。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3621-3628. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01979-1. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
This is not the way: global directional cues do not improve spatial learning in an immersive virtual environment.并非如此:全局方向线索并不能改善在沉浸式虚拟环境中的空间学习。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 7;10(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00654-1.
2
Using a picture (or a thousand words) for supporting spatial knowledge of a complex virtual environment.用图片(或千言万语)来支持复杂虚拟环境的空间知识。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 25;8(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00503-z.
3
Exploration patterns shape cognitive map learning.探索模式塑造认知图学习。
Cognition. 2023 Apr;233:105360. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105360. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Error tight: Exercises for lab groups to prevent research mistakes.错误防范:供实验小组预防研究错误的练习。
Psychol Methods. 2025 Apr;30(2):416-424. doi: 10.1037/met0000547. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
2
Talking Points: A Modulating Circle Increases Listening Effort Without Improving Speech Recognition in Young Adults.讨论要点:在年轻成年人中,调节环路增加了聆听努力程度,但并未提高言语识别能力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):536-543. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01713-y.
3
Everyday taxi drivers: Do better navigators have larger hippocampi?日常出租车司机:导航能力更好的人其海马体更大吗?
Cortex. 2019 Jun;115:280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.认知地图准确性的个体差异:探究地标熟悉度的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Mar;73(1):37-46. doi: 10.1037/cep0000165.
5
Keeping Track of Where We Are: Spatial Working Memory in Navigation.追踪我们所处的位置:导航中的空间工作记忆
Vis cogn. 2017;25(7-8):691-702. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1322652. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Charting the development of cognitive mapping.绘制认知地图的发展历程。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jun;170:86-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux.AFNI中的功能磁共振成像聚类:再谈假阳性率
Brain Connect. 2017 Apr;7(3):152-171. doi: 10.1089/brain.2016.0475.
8
Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.聚类失效:为何功能磁共振成像在空间范围推断上存在过高的假阳性率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 12;113(28):7900-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602413113. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.(一些)人是如何制作认知地图的?路线、地点和工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):768-785. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000200. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Rampant software errors may undermine scientific results.猖獗的软件错误可能会破坏科学成果。
F1000Res. 2014 Dec 11;3:303. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.5930.2. eCollection 2014.