• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知地图的差异:理解导航中的个体差异。

Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.

作者信息

Weisberg Steven M, Schinazi Victor R, Newcombe Nora S, Shipley Thomas F, Epstein Russell A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Temple University.

Department of Humanities, ETH Zurich.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):669-682. doi: 10.1037/a0035261. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1037/a0035261
PMID:24364725
Abstract

There are marked individual differences in the formation of cognitive maps both in the real world and in virtual environments (VE; e.g., Blajenkova, Motes, & Kozhevnikov, 2005; Chai & Jacobs, 2010; Ishikawa & Montello, 2006; Wen, Ishikawa, & Sato, 2011). These differences, however, are poorly understood and can be difficult to assess except by self-report methods. VEs offer an opportunity to collect objective data in environments that can be controlled and standardized. In this study, we designed a VE consisting of buildings arrayed along 2 separated routes, allowing for differentiation of between-route and within-route representation. Performance on a pointing task and a model-building task correlated with self-reported navigation ability. However, for participants with lower levels of between-route pointing, the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction scale (Hegarty, Richardson, Montello, Lovelace, & Subbiah, 2002) did not predict individual differences in accuracy when pointing to buildings within the same route. Thus, we confirm the existence of individual differences in the ability to construct a cognitive map of an environment, identify both the strengths and the potential weaknesses of self-report measures, and isolate a dimension that may help to characterize individual differences more completely. The VE designed for this study provides an objective behavioral measure of navigation ability that can be widely used as a research tool.

摘要

在现实世界和虚拟环境(VE)中,认知地图的形成存在显著的个体差异(例如,Blajenkova、Motes和Kozhevnikov,2005年;Chai和Jacobs,2010年;Ishikawa和Montello,2006年;Wen、Ishikawa和Sato,2011年)。然而,除了自我报告方法外,人们对这些差异了解甚少,且难以评估。虚拟环境为在可控且标准化的环境中收集客观数据提供了机会。在本研究中,我们设计了一个虚拟环境,其中的建筑沿着两条分开的路线排列,以便区分路线间和路线内的表征。指向任务和模型构建任务的表现与自我报告的导航能力相关。然而,对于路线间指向水平较低的参与者,圣巴巴拉方向感量表(Hegarty、Richardson、Montello、Lovelace和Subbiah,2002年)并不能预测在同一路线内指向建筑物时的个体准确性差异。因此,我们证实了在构建环境认知地图的能力方面存在个体差异,确定了自我报告测量方法的优势和潜在弱点,并分离出一个可能有助于更全面地表征个体差异的维度。为这项研究设计的虚拟环境提供了一种可广泛用作研究工具的导航能力客观行为测量方法。

相似文献

1
Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.认知地图的差异:理解导航中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):669-682. doi: 10.1037/a0035261. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
2
How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.(一些)人是如何制作认知地图的?路线、地点和工作记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):768-785. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000200. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
The path more travelled: Time pressure increases reliance on familiar route-based strategies during navigation.更常走的路:时间压力会增加导航过程中对基于熟悉路线的策略的依赖。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1439-1452. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1187637. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.导航策略与效率中的性别差异。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):909-922. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0811-y.
5
Charting the development of cognitive mapping.绘制认知地图的发展历程。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jun;170:86-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.个体在导航过程中视觉注意力分配的差异。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;76(1):10-21. doi: 10.1037/cep0000247. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
A slippery directional slope: Individual differences in using slope as a directional cue.一个不稳定的方向坡度:个体在将坡度用作方向线索方面的差异。
Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):648-61. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0387-5.
8
Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction.直流电刺激可提高空间方向感较低个体的导航效率。
Neuroreport. 2014 Oct 22;25(15):1175-9. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000214.
9
Representation of impossible worlds in the cognitive map.认知地图中不可能世界的表征。
Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:271-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0705-x.
10
Where are we going and where have we been? Examining the effects of maps on spatial learning in an indoor guided navigation task.我们要去哪里,我们去过哪里?在室内引导导航任务中考察地图对空间学习的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Mar 20;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00213-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial perspective taking is impaired in spinocerebellar ataxias and Friedreich ataxia.脊髓小脑共济失调和弗里德赖希共济失调患者的空间视角采择能力受损。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 24;15(1):31126. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16302-z.
2
Newly trained navigation and verbal memory skills elicit changes in task-related networks but not brain structure.新训练的导航和言语记忆技能会引起与任务相关的神经网络变化,但不会改变大脑结构。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 14:2025.04.14.648747. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.14.648747.
3
This is not the way: global directional cues do not improve spatial learning in an immersive virtual environment.
并非如此:全局方向线索并不能改善在沉浸式虚拟环境中的空间学习。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 7;10(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00654-1.
4
Navigating by Design: Effects of Individual Differences and Navigation Modality on Spatial Memory Acquisition.设计导航:个体差异和导航方式对空间记忆获取的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(7):959. doi: 10.3390/bs15070959.
5
Multimodal cue integration and learning in a neural representation of head direction.头部方向神经表征中的多模态线索整合与学习。
Nat Neurosci. 2025 Aug;28(8):1729-1740. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01823-z. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
6
Do spatial navigation and episodic memory rely on the same systems? Evidence from a naturalistic experience with children and adults.空间导航和情景记忆是否依赖于相同的系统?来自儿童和成人自然体验的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1037/xge0001805.
7
Individual differences in navigation skill: towards reliable and valid measures.导航技能的个体差异:迈向可靠且有效的测量方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 7;10(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00642-5.
8
Social and spatial predictors of collective search behaviors.集体搜索行为的社会和空间预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 30;15(1):19086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02460-7.
9
Research status of visuospatial dysfunction and spatial navigation.视觉空间功能障碍与空间导航的研究现状
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 May 14;17:1609620. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1609620. eCollection 2025.
10
Always Getting Lost: Defining Developmental Topographical Disorientation (DTD)-A Systematic Literature Review.总是迷路:定义发育性地形定向障碍(DTD)——一项系统文献综述
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09664-8.