• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脆弱性、能动性与研究遭遇:肯尼亚参与观察性临床研究的家庭成员的经历和看法。

Vulnerability, Agency, and the Research Encounter: Family Members' Experiences and Perceptions of Participating in an Observational Clinical Study in Kenya.

机构信息

Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, 285561KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, 6396University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Jul;16(3):238-254. doi: 10.1177/15562646211005304. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1177/15562646211005304
PMID:33764228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7613023/
Abstract

Pediatric clinical research in low-resourced countries involves individuals defined as "vulnerable" in research ethics guidance. Insights from research participants can strengthen the design and oversight of studies. We share family members' perspectives and experiences of an observational clinical study conducted in one Kenyan hospital as part of an integrated empirical ethics study. Employing qualitative methods, we explored how research encounters featured in family members' care-seeking journeys. Our data reveals that children's vulnerability is intricately interwoven with that of their families, and that research processes and procedures can inadvertently add to hidden burdens for families. In research, the potential for layered and intersecting situational and structural vulnerability should be considered, and participants' agency in constrained research contexts actively recognized and protected.

摘要

在资源匮乏国家开展儿科临床研究涉及到研究伦理指导中被定义为“弱势”的个体。研究参与者的意见可以加强研究的设计和监督。我们分享了肯尼亚一家医院进行的一项观察性临床研究中家庭成员的观点和经验,该研究是综合经验伦理研究的一部分。采用定性方法,我们探讨了研究遭遇如何出现在家庭成员的求医过程中。我们的数据表明,儿童的脆弱性与他们家庭的脆弱性错综复杂地交织在一起,研究过程和程序可能会给家庭带来隐藏的负担。在研究中,应该考虑潜在的分层和交叉的情境和结构性脆弱性,并积极认识和保护参与者在受限研究环境中的能动性。

相似文献

1
Vulnerability, Agency, and the Research Encounter: Family Members' Experiences and Perceptions of Participating in an Observational Clinical Study in Kenya.脆弱性、能动性与研究遭遇:肯尼亚参与观察性临床研究的家庭成员的经历和看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Jul;16(3):238-254. doi: 10.1177/15562646211005304. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Vulnerability and agency across treatment-seeking journeys for acutely ill children: how family members navigate complex healthcare before, during and after hospitalisation in a rural Kenyan setting.在肯尼亚农村地区,急性病患儿求医之旅中的脆弱性和能动性:在住院前、住院期间和住院后,家庭成员如何在复杂的医疗保健环境中艰难前行。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Aug 10;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01252-x.
3
Layered vulnerability and researchers' responsibilities: learning from research involving Kenyan adolescents living with perinatal HIV infection.分层脆弱性与研究人员的责任:从针对肯尼亚围产期感染艾滋病毒的青少年的研究中吸取经验教训。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 20;25(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00972-3.
4
A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments.儿童和青少年慢性非癌症疼痛及其家庭对自身状况、疼痛服务和治疗的体验和理解的元人种学研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 5;10(10):CD014873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014873.pub2.
5
Respecting relational agency in the context of vulnerability: What can research ethics learn from the social sciences?尊重脆弱性背景下的关系能动性:研究伦理可以从社会科学中学到什么?
Bioethics. 2023 May;37(4):379-388. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13139. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
6
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
7
Vulnerability and agency in research participants' daily lives and the research encounter: A qualitative case study of participants taking part in scrub typhus research in northern Thailand.研究参与者日常生活和研究遭遇中的脆弱性和能动性:泰国北部参与恙虫病研究的参与者的定性案例研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0280056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280056. eCollection 2023.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Understanding how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience living with pain, pain management and services: a meta-ethnography.理解患有慢性非癌症疼痛的儿童和青少年及其家庭的疼痛体验、疼痛管理和服务:一项荟萃民族志研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(17):1-218. doi: 10.3310/UTPM7986.
10
Enriching our understanding of vulnerability through the experiences and perspectives of individuals living with mental illness.通过患有精神疾病的个体的经历和观点,丰富我们对脆弱性的理解。
Account Res. 2019 Oct;26(7):439-459. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1679121. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Culturally responsive research ethics: How the socio-ethical norms of Arr-nar/Kreng-jai inform research participation at the Thai-Myanmar border.具有文化适应性的研究伦理:阿恩纳/克伦斋的社会伦理规范如何影响泰缅边境地区的研究参与情况。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 4;3(5):e0001875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001875. eCollection 2023.
2
Considering Risks to Researchers and Staff in Low-Resource Settings during Public Health Crises: A Proposed Conceptual Model.公共卫生危机期间低资源环境下研究人员和工作人员面临的风险:一个概念模型建议
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;10(3):463. doi: 10.3390/children10030463.
3
Strengthening the role of community health workers in supporting the recovery of ill, undernourished children post hospital discharge: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Bangladesh and Kenya.

本文引用的文献

1
Vulnerability and agency across treatment-seeking journeys for acutely ill children: how family members navigate complex healthcare before, during and after hospitalisation in a rural Kenyan setting.在肯尼亚农村地区,急性病患儿求医之旅中的脆弱性和能动性:在住院前、住院期间和住院后,家庭成员如何在复杂的医疗保健环境中艰难前行。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Aug 10;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01252-x.
2
Maintaining Distance and Staying Immersed: Practical Ethics in an Underresourced New Born Unit.保持距离与全心投入:资源匮乏的新生儿病房中的实践伦理
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Dec;14(5):509-512. doi: 10.1177/1556264619835709. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
强化社区卫生工作者在支持患病、营养不良儿童出院后康复方面的作用:孟加拉国和肯尼亚利益攸关方的定性见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07209-2.
4
Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya.开发针对研究中脆弱性的情境敏感反应模型:管理肯尼亚一线研究人员面临的伦理困境。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004937.
Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) Network: a protocol for a multi-site prospective cohort study to identify modifiable risk factors for mortality among acutely ill children in Africa and Asia.
儿童急性病与营养(CHAIN)网络:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案,旨在确定非洲和亚洲急性病儿童死亡的可改变风险因素。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 5;9(5):e028454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028454.
4
Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems.肯尼亚卫生利益相关者对重新使用医院住院数据以支持医疗系统学习的个人同意、一般通知和治理流程的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0343-9.
5
Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015).全球健康不平等研究中的不平等:一项50年的文献计量分析(1966 - 2015年)
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191901. eCollection 2018.
6
The 'empty choice': A sociological examination of choosing medical research participation in resource-limited Sub-Saharan Africa.“空洞的选择”:对撒哈拉以南非洲资源有限地区参与医学研究选择的社会学考察
Curr Sociol. 2015 Sep;63(5):763-778. doi: 10.1177/0011392115590093. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Conceptualising the agency of highly marginalised women: Intimate partner violence in extreme settings.对高度边缘化女性的能动性进行概念化:极端环境下的亲密伴侣暴力。
Glob Public Health. 2016;11(1-2):1-16. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1109694.
8
"The one who chases you away does not tell you go": silent refusals and complex power relations in research consent processes in Coastal Kenya.“赶走你的人不会告诉你离开”:肯尼亚沿海地区研究同意程序中的无声拒绝与复杂权力关系
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0126671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126671. eCollection 2015.
9
"When they see us, it's like they have seen the benefits!": experiences of study benefits negotiations in community-based studies on the Kenyan Coast.“当他们看到我们时,就好像看到了好处!”:肯尼亚海岸社区研究中研究利益谈判的经历
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Dec 24;15:90. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-90.
10
What are fair study benefits in international health research? Consulting community members in Kenya.国际卫生研究中的公平研究利益是什么?在肯尼亚咨询社区成员。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e113112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113112. eCollection 2014.