Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, The Bournemouth University Business School, 89 Holdenhurst Road, Bournemouth BH8 8EB, UK.
Zurich University of Applied Sciences (International Management Institute) and Kozminski University, Poland.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;276:113830. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113830. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging how healthcare technologies are evaluated, as new, more dynamic methods are required to test the cost effectiveness of alternative interventions during use rather than before initial adoption. Currently, health technology assessment (HTA) tends to be static and a priori: alternatives are compared before launch, and little evaluation occurs after implementation. We suggest a method that builds upon the current pre-launch HTA procedures by conceptualizing a mean-variance approach to the continuous evaluation of attainable portfolios of interventions in health systems. Our framework uses frontier analysis to identify the desirability of available health interventions so decision makers can choose diverse portfolios based upon information about expected returns and risks. This approach facilitates the extension of existing methods and assessments beyond the traditional concern with pre-adoption data, a much-needed innovation given the challenges posed by COVID-19.
COVID-19 大流行正在挑战医疗技术的评估方式,因为需要新的、更具动态性的方法来测试替代干预措施在使用过程中的成本效益,而不是在最初采用之前。目前,卫生技术评估(HTA)往往是静态的和先验的:在推出之前比较替代方案,实施后几乎没有评估。我们建议一种方法,通过将均值-方差方法应用于卫生系统中干预措施的可实现组合的连续评估,在当前的预启动 HTA 程序基础上进行构建。我们的框架使用前沿分析来确定现有卫生干预措施的可取性,以便决策者可以根据预期回报和风险的信息选择多样化的投资组合。鉴于 COVID-19 带来的挑战,这种方法促进了现有方法和评估的扩展,超越了对采用前数据的传统关注,这是一种急需的创新。