Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH-Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Microbiome. 2021 Mar 25;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01023-y.
In this comment, we analyse the conceptual framework proposed by Aguirre de Cárcer (Microbiome 7:142, 2019), introducing the novel concept of Phylogenetic Core Groups (PCGs). This notion aims to complement the traditional classification in operational taxonomic units (OTUs), widely used in microbial ecology, to provide a more intrinsic taxonomical classification which avoids the use of pre-determined thresholds. However, to introduce this concept, the author frames his proposal in a wider theoretical framework based on a conceptualization of selection that we argue is a tautology. This blurs the subsequent formulation of an assembly principle for microbial communities, favouring that some contradictory examples introduced to support the framework appear aligned in their conclusions. And more importantly, under this framework and its derived methodology, it is not possible to infer PCGs from data in a consistent way. We reanalyse the proposal to identify its logical and methodological flaws and, through the analysis of synthetic scenarios, we propose a number of methodological refinements to contribute towards the determination of PCGs in a consistent way. We hope our analysis will promote the exploration of PCGs as a potentially valuable tool, helping to bridge the gap between environmental conditions and community composition in microbial ecology. Video Abstract.
在这条评论中,我们分析了 Aguirre de Cárcer(Microbiome 7:142, 2019)提出的概念框架,引入了新的分类概念——系统发育核心群(PCGs)。该概念旨在补充微生物生态学中广泛使用的传统分类操作分类单元(OTUs),以提供一种更内在的分类方法,避免使用预先确定的阈值。然而,为了引入这个概念,作者将他的提议置于一个更广泛的理论框架中,这个框架基于我们认为是同义反复的选择概念化。这使得随后提出的微生物群落组装原则的表述变得模糊不清,导致一些为支持该框架而引入的矛盾例子在结论上似乎一致。更重要的是,在这个框架及其衍生的方法学下,不可能以一致的方式从数据中推断出 PCGs。我们重新分析了该提议,以确定其逻辑和方法学上的缺陷,并通过对综合场景的分析,提出了一些方法学上的改进,以有助于以一致的方式确定 PCGs。我们希望我们的分析将促进对 PCGs 的探索,作为一种潜在有价值的工具,有助于弥合微生物生态学中环境条件和群落组成之间的差距。视频摘要。