Department of Environment and Agronomy, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Madrid, Spain.
Department of Ecology, Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CIDE - CSIC), Moncada, Spain.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2019 Nov;19(6):1552-1564. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13079. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
Co-occurrence network analysis based on amplicon sequences is increasingly used to study microbial communities. Patterns of co-existence or mutual exclusion between pairs of taxa are often interpreted as reflecting positive or negative biological interactions. However, other assembly processes can underlie these patterns, including species failure to reach distant areas (dispersal limitation) and tolerate local environmental conditions (habitat filtering). We provide a tool to quantify the relative contribution of community assembly processes to microbial co-occurrence patterns, which we applied to explore soil bacterial communities in two dry ecosystems. First, we sequenced a bacterial phylogenetic marker in soils collected across multiple plots. Second, we inferred co-occurrence networks to identify pairs of significantly associated taxa, either co-existing more (aggregated) or less often (segregated) than expected at random. Third, we assigned assembly processes to each pair: patterns explained based on spatial or environmental distance were ascribed to dispersal limitation (2%-4%) or habitat filtering (55%-77%), and the remaining to biological interactions. Finally, we calculated the phylogenetic distance between taxon pairs to test theoretical expectations on the linkages between phylogenetic patterns and assembly processes. Aggregated pairs were more closely related than segregated pairs. Furthermore, habitat-filtered aggregated pairs were closer relatives than those assigned to positive interactions, consistent with phylogenetic niche conservatism and cooperativism among distantly related taxa. Negative interactions resulted in equivocal phylogenetic signatures, probably because different competitive processes leave opposing signals. We show that microbial co-occurrence networks mainly reflect environmental tolerances and propose that incorporating measures of phylogenetic relatedness to networks might help elucidate ecologically meaningful patterns.
基于扩增子序列的共生网络分析越来越多地用于研究微生物群落。对分类群之间共存或互斥模式的解释通常反映了正或负的生物相互作用。然而,其他组装过程也可能导致这些模式,包括物种无法到达遥远的区域(扩散限制)和耐受当地环境条件(栖息地过滤)。我们提供了一种工具来量化群落组装过程对微生物共生模式的相对贡献,并应用它来探索两个干燥生态系统中的土壤细菌群落。首先,我们在多个样点采集的土壤中测序了细菌系统发育标记。其次,我们推断了共生网络,以识别出显著相关的分类群对,要么比随机预期更经常(聚集)或更不经常(分离)共存。第三,我们将组装过程分配给每一对:基于空间或环境距离解释的模式归因于扩散限制(2%-4%)或栖息地过滤(55%-77%),其余归因于生物相互作用。最后,我们计算了分类群对之间的系统发育距离,以检验系统发育模式与组装过程之间联系的理论预期。聚集的对比分离的对更密切相关。此外,被归为正相互作用的聚集的过滤的分类群比被归为栖息地过滤的分类群更密切相关,这与系统发育生态位保守性以及远缘分类群之间的合作有关。负相互作用导致了模棱两可的系统发育特征,可能是因为不同的竞争过程留下了相反的信号。我们表明,微生物共生网络主要反映了环境耐受性,并提出将系统发育关系的度量纳入网络可能有助于阐明具有生态意义的模式。