Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, PA (Dr Kern-Goldberger).
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs Arditi, Wen, Gyamfi-Bannerman, D'Alton, and Friedman).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100354. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100354. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
Need for critical care during delivery hospitalizations may be an important maternal outcome measure, but it is not well characterized.
This study aimed to characterize the risks and disparities in critical care diagnoses and interventions during delivery hospitalizations.
This serial cross-sectional study used the 2000-2014 National Inpatient Sample. Here, the primary outcome was a composite of critical care interventions and diagnoses, including mechanical ventilation and intubation, central monitoring, septicemia, coma, acute cerebrovascular disease, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Swan-Ganz catheter monitoring, cardiac rhythm conversion, and respiratory failure. Temporal trends, risk of death, and the proportion of deaths with a critical care composite diagnosis were determined. Unadjusted and adjusted log-linear regression models were fit with a critical care composite as the outcome, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hospital factors. To evaluate the role of critical care interventions in disparities, analyses were stratified by maternal race and ethnicity.
Of 45.8 million deliveries identified, 0.21% had a critical care procedure or diagnosis during the delivery hospitalization. Overall, 75.8% of maternal deaths had an associated diagnosis from a critical care composite. The critical composite increased from 17.9 to 30.3 per 10,000 deliveries from 2000 to 2014 with an average annual percentage change of 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.5). Mechanical ventilation and intubation (21.5% of cases) and respiratory failure (54.8% of cases) were the most common diagnoses present in the composite. Although non-Hispanic black women were at 32.4% higher risk than non-Hispanic white women to die in the setting of a critical care diagnosis (2.2% vs 1.7%; P<.01), they were 162% more likely to have a critical care diagnosis (risk ratio, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.58-2.66). Of clinical factors, primary cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk, 7.54; 95% confidence interval, 7.43-7.65), postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted relative risk, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 5.02-5.19), and chronic kidney disease (adjusted relative risk, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 3.89-4.23) were associated with the highest adjusted risk of a critical care composite.
Three-quarters of maternal deaths were associated with a critical care diagnosis or procedure. The rate of critical care during delivery hospitalizations increased over the study period. Maternal mortality disparities may result from risks of conditions that require critical care rather than the care received once a critical care condition has developed.
分娩住院期间需要重症监护可能是一个重要的产妇结局衡量标准,但目前对此了解甚少。
本研究旨在描述分娩住院期间重症监护诊断和干预的风险和差异。
本研究采用 2000 年至 2014 年的全国住院患者样本进行了这项系列横断面研究。在这里,主要结局是重症监护干预和诊断的综合指标,包括机械通气和插管、中央监测、败血症、昏迷、急性脑血管病、体外膜氧合、 Swan-Ganz 导管监测、心脏节律转换和呼吸衰竭。确定了时间趋势、死亡率风险以及与重症监护综合诊断相关的死亡比例。使用重症监护综合指标作为结局,采用未经调整和调整后的对数线性回归模型进行拟合,调整了人口统计学、临床和医院因素。为了评估重症监护干预在差异中的作用,按产妇种族和民族进行了分层分析。
在确定的 4580 万例分娩中,有 0.21%的分娩在住院期间进行了重症监护治疗或诊断。总体而言,75.8%的产妇死亡与重症监护综合诊断有关。重症监护综合指标从 2000 年到 2014 年从每 10000 例分娩的 17.9 例增加到 30.3 例,平均年增长率为 3.4%(95%置信区间,1.3-5.5)。机械通气和插管(21.5%的病例)和呼吸衰竭(54.8%的病例)是综合指标中最常见的诊断。尽管非西班牙裔黑人妇女死于重症监护诊断的风险比非西班牙裔白人妇女高 32.4%(2.2%比 1.7%;P<.01),但她们接受重症监护诊断的可能性要高出 162%(风险比,2.62;95%置信区间,2.58-2.66)。在临床因素中,初次剖宫产(调整后的相对风险,7.54;95%置信区间,7.43-7.65)、产后出血(调整后的相对风险,5.11;95%置信区间,5.02-5.19)和慢性肾脏病(调整后的相对风险,4.06;95%置信区间,3.89-4.23)与重症监护综合指标的最高调整风险相关。
三分之二的产妇死亡与重症监护诊断或治疗有关。分娩住院期间接受重症监护的比例在研究期间有所增加。产妇死亡率的差异可能是由于需要重症监护的疾病风险造成的,而不是一旦出现重症监护情况后所接受的治疗造成的。