• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Impact of Dobbs v Jackson on Future Critical Care Workforce: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

作者信息

Navuluri Neelima, Zimo Jessica, Byrd Kaitland, Lee Kathleen Tiffany, Viglianti Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Chest. 2025 Jan;167(1):160-163. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.142. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.142
PMID:39059580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11898222/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/11898222/d6db55e637d6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/11898222/d6db55e637d6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb33/11898222/d6db55e637d6/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Dobbs v Jackson on Future Critical Care Workforce: A Cross-Sectional Survey.多布斯诉杰克逊案对未来重症监护医护人员队伍的影响：一项横断面调查
Chest. 2025 Jan;167(1):160-163. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.142. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision.多布斯诉杰克逊案前后的在线药物流产直接向患者提供服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2434675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34675.
3
People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.
4
Abortion Rights: Perspectives of Academic Scientists in the United States.堕胎权利：美国学术科学家的观点
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 4;5(1):602-612. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0041. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduating Residents' Practice Plans.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的裁决对妇产科住院医师毕业生执业计划的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov 1;142(5):1105-1111. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005383. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案对医疗保健劳动力的影响。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2747-2750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6. Epub 2024 May 22.
7
Student and Physician Views of How the Dobbs Decision Affects Training and Practice Location Preferences: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.学生和医生对多布斯裁决如何影响培训和执业地点偏好的看法：横断面问卷调查研究
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Jan 7;14:e55035. doi: 10.2196/55035.
8
Attitudes Among Society of Women in Urology Members Toward Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.美国泌尿外科女性协会成员对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的态度。
Urology. 2023 Oct;180:295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.044. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
9
Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.美国多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后的堕胎设施出行时间估计和空间可达性。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2041-2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20424.
10
Impact of State Abortion Policies on Family Medicine Practice and Training After .州堕胎政策对. 后的家庭医学实践和培训的影响
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;22(6):492-501. doi: 10.1370/afm.3183.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional support for navigating abortion bans in pulmonary and critical care: a multistate qualitative study.机构对应对肺部和重症监护领域堕胎禁令的支持：一项多州定性研究。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 May 2;3(5):qxaf095. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf095. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.堕胎权放宽后，妇产科住院医师申请人数的变化趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355017. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55017.
2
Attitudes Among Society of Women in Urology Members Toward Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.美国泌尿外科女性协会成员对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的态度。
Urology. 2023 Oct;180:295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.044. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Reworking Emergency Medicine Resident Education Post-Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.
多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案后急诊医学住院医师教育的改革
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Jun;15(3):283-286. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00300.1. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Practice Location Preferences in Response to State Abortion Restrictions Among Physicians and Trainees on Social Media.社交媒体上医生和实习生针对州堕胎限制措施的执业地点偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(10):2419-2423. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08096-5. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
5
State Abortion Policies and Maternal Death in the United States, 2015‒2018.2015 - 2018年美国各州堕胎政策与孕产妇死亡情况
Am J Public Health. 2021 Sep;111(9):1696-1704. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306396. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Risk for and disparities in critical care during delivery hospitalizations.分娩住院期间的重症监护风险和差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100354. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100354. Epub 2021 Mar 22.