• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国各地心血管磁共振服务提供的区域差异。

Regional variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance service delivery across the UK.

机构信息

Cardiology, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, Hertfordshire, UK

MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Heart. 2021 Dec;107(24):1974-1979. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318667. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318667
PMID:33766986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8639953/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine service provision in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the UK. Equitable access to diagnostic imaging is important in healthcare. CMR is widely available in the UK, but there may be regional variations.

METHODS

An electronic survey was sent by the British Society of CMR to the service leads of all CMR units in the UK in 2019 requesting data from 2017 and 2018. Responses were analysed by region and interpreted alongside population statistics.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 100% (82 units). 100 386 clinical scans were performed in 2017 and 114 967 in 2018 (15% 1-year increase; 5-fold 10-year increase compared with 2008 data). In 2018, there were 1731 CMR scans/million population overall, with significant regional variation, for example, 4256 scans/million in London vs 396 scans/million in Wales. Median number of clinical scans per unit was 780, IQR 373-1951, range 98-10 000, with wide variation in mean waiting times (median 41 days, IQR 30-49, range 5-180); median 25 days in London vs 180 days in Northern Ireland). Twenty-five units (30%) reported mean elective waiting times in excess of 6 weeks, and 8 (10%) ≥3 months. There were 351 consultants reporting CMR, of whom 230 (66%) were cardiologists and 121 (34%) radiologists; 81% of units offered a CMR service for patients with pacemakers and defibrillators.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides a unique, contemporary insight into national CMR delivery with 100% centre engagement. The 10-year growth in CMR usage at fivefold has been remarkable but heterogeneous across the UK, with some regions still reporting low usage or long waiting times which may be of clinical concern.

摘要

目的

研究英国心血管磁共振(CMR)的服务提供情况。在医疗保健中,公平获得诊断成像至关重要。CMR 在英国广泛可用,但可能存在区域差异。

方法

2019 年,英国心血管磁共振学会通过电子调查向英国所有 CMR 单位的服务负责人发送了一份调查,要求提供 2017 年和 2018 年的数据。根据地区对回复进行分析,并结合人口统计数据进行解释。

结果

调查回复率为 100%(82 个单位)。2017 年进行了 100386 次临床扫描,2018 年进行了 114967 次(1 年增长 15%,与 2008 年数据相比增长 5 倍)。2018 年,总体上每百万人口有 1731 次 CMR 扫描,存在显著的区域差异,例如伦敦有 4256 次/百万,而威尔士有 396 次/百万。每个单位的临床扫描中位数为 780,IQR 373-1951,范围 98-10000,平均等待时间差异很大(中位数 41 天,IQR 30-49,范围 5-180);伦敦的中位数为 25 天,北爱尔兰的中位数为 180 天。25 个单位(30%)报告平均选择性等待时间超过 6 周,8 个单位(10%)超过 3 个月。有 351 名顾问报告了 CMR,其中 230 名(66%)是心脏病专家,121 名(34%)是放射科医生;81%的单位为起搏器和除颤器患者提供 CMR 服务。

结论

这项调查提供了一个独特的、当代的全国 CMR 服务提供情况的深入了解,10 年来 CMR 使用量增长了 5 倍,这是显著的,但在英国各地存在异质性,一些地区的使用率仍然较低或等待时间较长,这可能引起临床关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb2/8639953/e2bdb2fca08f/heartjnl-2020-318667f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb2/8639953/5916e213a01e/heartjnl-2020-318667f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb2/8639953/e2bdb2fca08f/heartjnl-2020-318667f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb2/8639953/5916e213a01e/heartjnl-2020-318667f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb2/8639953/e2bdb2fca08f/heartjnl-2020-318667f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Regional variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance service delivery across the UK.英国各地心血管磁共振服务提供的区域差异。
Heart. 2021 Dec;107(24):1974-1979. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318667. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance activity in the United Kingdom: a survey on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.英国心血管磁共振活动:代表英国心血管磁共振学会的调查。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Oct 6;13(1):57. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-57.
3
Regional variability of cardiovascular magnetic resonance access and utilization in the United States.美国心血管磁共振检查的可及性与利用情况的区域差异
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101061. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101061. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Clinical value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR-conditional pacemakers.磁共振兼容起搏器患者心血管磁共振成像的临床价值
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;17(10):1178-85. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev305. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
5
Inequity of access to contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with chronic kidney disease: A survey from the British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.慢性肾脏病患者在使用对比增强心血管磁共振成像方面的可及性不平等:来自英国心血管磁共振学会的一项调查
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Jan 26;27(1):101846. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101846.
6
Safety of cardiac magnetic resonance and contrast angiography for neonates and small infants: a 10-year single-institution experience.新生儿和小婴儿心脏磁共振和对比血管造影的安全性:10 年单机构经验。
Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Nov;42(11):1339-46. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2452-9. Epub 2012 Aug 12.
7
The State of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Canada: Results from the CanSCMR Pan-Canadian Survey.加拿大心血管磁共振成像现状:来自 CanSCMR 全加调查的结果。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Mar;34(3):333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Incidental extra-cardiac findings on clinical CMR.临床心脏磁共振检查中的偶然心脏外表现。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;14(2):158-66. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes133. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
9
Cardiovascular examination with 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: first 100 cases at Ramathibodi Hospital.3.0特斯拉磁共振成像在心血管检查中的应用:拉玛蒂博迪医院的前100例病例
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89(9):1388-95.
10
UK Biobank's cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol.英国生物银行的心血管磁共振检查方案。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Feb 1;18:8. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0227-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Current trends and challenges in the clinical use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a survey from the Italian Society of Cardiology.心血管磁共振临床应用的当前趋势与挑战:来自意大利心脏病学会的一项调查
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):qyaf046. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf046. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Status of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinical application and scientific research: a national survey in China.心血管磁共振成像在临床应用与科研中的现状:一项中国全国性调查
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101877. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101877. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
Barriers to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging scan performance and reporting by cardiologists: a systematic literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular imaging for stable coronary heart disease.心血管成像在稳定型冠心病中的成本效益。
Heart. 2021 Mar;107(5):381-388. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316990. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
2
ACC/AHA/ASE/HRS/ISACHD/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SOPE 2020 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging During the Follow-Up Care of Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee and Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Pediatric Echocardiography.ACC/AHA/ASE/HRS/ISACHD/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SOPE 2020先天性心脏病患者随访期间多模态成像的合理使用标准:美国心脏病学会解决方案集监督委员会和合理使用标准工作组、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、心律学会、国际成人先天性心脏病学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会以及儿科超声心动图学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 18;75(6):657-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.002. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
心脏病专家进行心血管磁共振成像扫描及报告的障碍:一项系统文献综述
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Jan 22;3(1):qyaf010. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf010. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Inequity of access to contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with chronic kidney disease: A survey from the British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.慢性肾脏病患者在使用对比增强心血管磁共振成像方面的可及性不平等:来自英国心血管磁共振学会的一项调查
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Jan 26;27(1):101846. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101846.
5
Diagnostic approach to heart failure in Türkiye.土耳其心力衰竭的诊断方法。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 May 7;54(7):1461-1469. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5932. eCollection 2024.
6
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction for decision-making.用于决策的心血管磁共振成像与超声心动图得出的左心室射血分数对比
Future Cardiol. 2024 Dec-Dec;20(15-16):811-814. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2426875. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
7
Multimodal Cardiac Imaging Revisited by Artificial Intelligence: An Innovative Way of Assessment or Just an Aid?人工智能对多模态心脏成像的再审视:一种创新的评估方式还是仅仅是一种辅助手段?
Cureus. 2024 Jul 10;16(7):e64272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64272. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in systemic sclerosis: Heart involvement in high-resolution.系统性硬化症的心脏磁共振成像:高分辨率下的心脏受累情况
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2024 Jul 15;5(2):83-92. doi: 10.1515/rir-2024-0011. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Head-to-Head Comparison and Temporal Trends of Cardiac MRI Recommendations in ESC versus ACC/AHA Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头对头比较和 ESC 与 ACC/AHA 指南中心脏 MRI 推荐的时间趋势:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Jun;6(3):e230271. doi: 10.1148/ryct.230271.
10
Clinical assessment of an AI tool for measuring biventricular parameters on cardiac MR.一种用于在心脏磁共振成像上测量双心室参数的人工智能工具的临床评估
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 5;11:1279298. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1279298. eCollection 2024.
3
UK perspective on the changing landscape of non-invasive cardiac testing.英国视角下的无创性心脏检测领域的变化格局。
Open Heart. 2019 Dec 5;6(2):e001186. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001186. eCollection 2019.
4
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
5
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会/美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏协会/美国超声心动图学会/美国核心脏病学会/心律学会/心血管造影和介入学会/心血管计算机断层扫描学会/心血管磁共振学会/胸外科医师学会2019年非瓣膜性心脏病心脏结构和功能评估中多模态成像的合理使用标准:美国心脏病学会合理使用标准工作组、美国胸外科医师协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核心脏病学会、心律学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会及胸外科医师学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 5;73(4):488-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.038. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Challenges in delivering computed tomography coronary angiography as the first-line test for stable chest pain.作为稳定型胸痛一线检查,开展计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影的挑战。
Heart. 2018 Jun;104(11):921-927. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311846. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017年心脏瓣膜病多模态成像适宜性标准:美国心脏病学会适宜性标准工作组、美国胸外科协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核心脏病学会、心律学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、心血管磁共振学会及胸外科医师学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 26;70(13):1647-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.732. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
The global cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry (GCMR) of the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR): its goals, rationale, data infrastructure, and current developments.心血管磁共振学会(SCMR)的全球心血管磁共振注册研究(GCMR):其目标、基本原理、数据基础设施及当前进展
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0321-7.
9
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗工作组编写,欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Suspected Coronary Heart Disease: Long-Term Follow-up of a Prospective, Diagnostic Accuracy Cohort Study.心血管磁共振成像和单光子发射计算机断层扫描在疑似冠心病中的预后价值:一项前瞻性诊断准确性队列研究的长期随访
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jul 5;165(1):1-9. doi: 10.7326/M15-1801. Epub 2016 May 10.