Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Department of Urology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Int J Urol. 2021 May;28(5):493-501. doi: 10.1111/iju.14495. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy has steadily gained wider acceptance among urologists compared with open and laparoscopic approaches. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy has shown comparable perioperative and oncologic outcomes compared with open radical cystectomy. Nevertheless, data about the functional outcomes and quality of life after robot-assisted radical cystectomy remain limited. We sought to review the literature and describe urinary, sexual and bowel functions after robot-assisted radical cystectomy in addition to mental health and health-related quality of life. Despite limitations of the available literature, data suggests that functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy are comparable to open radical cystectomy. However, more studies utilizing standardized definitions are required.
与开放和腹腔镜方法相比，机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术在泌尿科医生中逐渐获得更广泛的认可。机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术在围手术期和肿瘤学结果方面与开放根治性膀胱切除术相当。然而，关于机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的功能结果和生活质量的数据仍然有限。我们试图回顾文献，并描述机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的尿、性和肠功能，以及心理健康和健康相关的生活质量。尽管可用文献存在局限性，但数据表明，机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的功能结果与开放根治性膀胱切除术相当。然而，需要更多使用标准化定义的研究。
