• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Australia after Bawa-Garba: Does Reflective Learning Remain Tenable for Health Care Practitioners?

作者信息

Mills Christopher D

机构信息

Consultant Physician, West Gippsland Health Care Group; Interventional Gastroenterologist, Gippsland Specialist Group; Adjunct Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2021 Mar;28(2):475-491.

PMID:33768753
Abstract

Should a written reflection about regrets be part of the private life of a doctor - or of any health care practitioner - or something that can be used in the public domain when things do go wrong? This article examines the tenability of reflective practice in Australia after the Bawa-Garba cases, outlining the options for the future of reflective practice, and assessing the options ranging from maintaining the current status quo to protecting the use of reflections via absolute legal privilege. In particular, this article explores the value of reflective practice in the broader context, weighing up which of the options for change to reflective practice bring with it the greatest enhancement to public safety. This work concludes by suggesting a potential method for allowing the continued safe implementation of reflective practice by stakeholder groups: briefly considering the novel proposition in the Williams Review that could be adopted in Australia.

摘要

相似文献

1
Australia after Bawa-Garba: Does Reflective Learning Remain Tenable for Health Care Practitioners?
J Law Med. 2021 Mar;28(2):475-491.
2
Cross-sectional exploration of the impact of the Dr Bawa-Garba case on doctors' professional behaviours and attitudes towards the regulator.横断面探索巴瓦-加尔巴案对医生专业行为和对监管机构态度的影响。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e045395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045395.
3
Trainee engagement with reflection in online portfolios: A qualitative study highlighting the impact of the Bawa-Garba case on professional development.在线档案袋中反思的参与:一项强调 Bawa-Garba 案例对专业发展影响的定性研究。
Med Teach. 2021 Jun;43(6):656-662. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1887833. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Regulatory justice following gross negligence manslaughter verdicts: Nurse/doctor differences.严重过失杀人罪判决后的监管公正:护士/医生的差异。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):247-257. doi: 10.1177/0969733019833124. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
5
Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the rightful domain of the criminal law.布拉姆霍尔博士、巴瓦-加尔巴博士与刑法的正当领域。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;45(3):151-155. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105135. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
On the "Flip Side": An Autoethnography Utilizing Professional Reflective Practice Skills to Navigate a Medical Experience as the Patient.从“另一面”看:一篇运用专业反思实践技能以患者身份体验医疗过程的自我民族志。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Mar;51(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.11.007. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
New guidance on reflective practice to be published in wake of Bawa-Garba case.在巴瓦-加尔巴案之后,将发布关于反思性实践的新指南。
BMJ. 2018 May 18;361:k2225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2225.
8
Protecting Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors (NCHDs): The Fallout from the Bawa-Garba Case.
Ir Med J. 2018 Apr 19;111(4):665.
9
Regulation of Substandard Medical Practice: Lessons from the Bawa-Garba Case.规范不合格医疗行为:巴瓦-加尔巴案的教训
J Law Med. 2018 Apr;25(3):603-625.
10
Permission without Direction: Gross Negligence Manslaughter and Erasure following Bawa-Garba.无指导的许可:巴瓦-加尔巴案后的重大过失杀人罪与除名
Eur J Health Law. 2019 Jun 19;26(3):183-203. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12264431.