Suppr超能文献

残疾评估自动化评估策略:意大利福利体系决策过程简化的实用选择。

The Strategy of Evaluation Automatism for Disability Assessment: A Pragmatic Choice to Simplify the Decision-making Process in the Italian Welfare System.

机构信息

INPS doctor, Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale/National Social Security Institute (INPS), Centro Medico Legale/Legal Medical Center, Iglesias, South Sardinia, Italy.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2021 Mar;28(2):521-536.

Abstract

The first instance assessment of all disability sectors in Italy takes place in most parts of the country in two stages. The first step is the applicant's examination and judgment performed by the Local Health Authority (ASL). The second phase is the verification of the National Social Security Institute (INPS) on the ASL report, which ends with its confirmation or suspension and repetition. Disability examination strategies can fluctuate between the evaluation automatism and the personalised approach. Evaluation automatism implies a necessary and shared prediction of the judgment due to a specific diagnosis. The personalised approach favours a rigorously individualised, unrepeatable assessment, specifically adapted to the case examined. In both perspectives, the criteria for defining disability belong to a medical model that measures the disease-related impairment. The degree of sharing of judgments between ASL and INPS can often imply and express the contribution of the evaluation automatism to the procedure.

摘要

意大利大部分地区的所有残疾领域的初次评估分两个阶段进行。第一步是由地方卫生局(ASL)对申请人进行检查和判断。第二步是国家社会保障研究所(INPS)对 ASL 报告进行核实,最终确认或中止并重复该报告。残疾检查策略在评估自动化和个性化方法之间波动。评估自动化意味着由于特定诊断而对判断进行必要的和共同的预测。个性化方法倾向于严格个性化、不可重复的评估,专门适用于所检查的病例。在这两种观点中,定义残疾的标准都属于一种衡量与疾病相关的损伤的医学模式。ASL 和 INPS 之间判断的共享程度通常意味着并表达了评估自动化对程序的贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验