• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期识别癫痫手术候选人:一项多中心、机器学习研究。

Early identification of epilepsy surgery candidates: A multicenter, machine learning study.

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2021 Jul;144(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/ane.13418. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1111/ane.13418
PMID:33769560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178229/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Epilepsy surgery is underutilized. Automating the identification of potential surgical candidates may facilitate earlier intervention. Our objective was to develop site-specific machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify candidates before they undergo surgery.

MATERIALS & METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal cohort study, ML algorithms were trained on n-grams extracted from free-text neurology notes, EEG and MRI reports, visit codes, medications, procedures, laboratories, and demographic information. Site-specific algorithms were developed at two epilepsy centers: one pediatric and one adult. Cases were defined as patients who underwent resective epilepsy surgery, and controls were patients with epilepsy with no history of surgery. The output of the ML algorithms was the estimated likelihood of candidacy for resective epilepsy surgery. Model performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

There were 5880 children (n = 137 had surgery [2.3%]) and 7604 adults with epilepsy (n = 56 had surgery [0.7%]) included in the study. Pediatric surgical patients could be identified 2.0 years (range: 0-8.6 years) before beginning their presurgical evaluation with AUC =0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82) and PR-AUC =0.13 (95% CI: 0.07-0.18). Adult surgical patients could be identified 1.0 year (range: 0-5.4 years) before beginning their presurgical evaluation with AUC =0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93) and PR-AUC =0.31 (95% CI: 0.14-0.48). By the time patients began their presurgical evaluation, the ML algorithms identified pediatric and adult surgical patients with AUC =0.93 and 0.95, respectively. The mean squared error of the predicted probability of surgical candidacy (Brier scores) was 0.018 in pediatrics and 0.006 in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Site-specific machine learning algorithms can identify candidates for epilepsy surgery early in the disease course in diverse practice settings.

摘要

目的

癫痫手术的应用不足。自动化识别潜在手术候选者可能有助于更早进行干预。我们的目标是开发特定于部位的机器学习(ML)算法,以便在患者接受手术之前识别出候选者。

材料与方法

在这项多中心、回顾性、纵向队列研究中,从自由文本神经学记录、脑电图和磁共振成像报告、就诊代码、药物、程序、实验室和人口统计学信息中提取 n-gram,用于训练特定于部位的 ML 算法。在两个癫痫中心(一个儿科中心和一个成人中心)开发部位特定算法。病例定义为接受切除术治疗的癫痫患者,对照组为有癫痫但无手术史的患者。ML 算法的输出是接受切除术治疗的癫痫候选者的估计可能性。使用 10 倍交叉验证评估模型性能。

结果

共有 5880 名儿童(n=137 例接受手术[2.3%])和 7604 名成人癫痫患者(n=56 例接受手术[0.7%])纳入研究。儿科手术患者可以在开始术前评估前 2.0 年(范围:0-8.6 年)识别出来,AUC=0.76(95%CI:0.70-0.82),PR-AUC=0.13(95%CI:0.07-0.18)。成人手术患者可以在开始术前评估前 1.0 年(范围:0-5.4 年)识别出来,AUC=0.85(95%CI:0.78-0.93),PR-AUC=0.31(95%CI:0.14-0.48)。当患者开始术前评估时,ML 算法分别识别出儿科和成人手术患者,AUC 分别为 0.93 和 0.95。预测手术候选者概率的均方误差(Brier 分数)在儿科为 0.018,在成人中为 0.006。

结论

特定于部位的机器学习算法可以在疾病早期在不同的实践环境中识别出癫痫手术的候选者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/3db1cdb0b9f0/nihms-1694418-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/880c6d03ec6d/nihms-1694418-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/61292a691d56/nihms-1694418-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/3db1cdb0b9f0/nihms-1694418-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/880c6d03ec6d/nihms-1694418-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/61292a691d56/nihms-1694418-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e77/8178229/3db1cdb0b9f0/nihms-1694418-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Early identification of epilepsy surgery candidates: A multicenter, machine learning study.早期识别癫痫手术候选人:一项多中心、机器学习研究。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2021 Jul;144(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/ane.13418. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Early Identification of Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: A Multicenter, Machine Learning, Prospective Validation Study.早期识别癫痫手术候选者:一项多中心、机器学习、前瞻性验证研究。
Neurology. 2024 Feb;102(4):e208048. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208048. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
Prospective validation of a machine learning model that uses provider notes to identify candidates for resective epilepsy surgery.使用医生记录来识别适合癫痫手术的候选者的机器学习模型的前瞻性验证。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):39-48. doi: 10.1111/epi.16398. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
4
Development and validation of machine learning models for prediction of seizure outcome after pediatric epilepsy surgery.机器学习模型在儿童癫痫手术后癫痫发作结果预测中的开发和验证。
Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):1956-1969. doi: 10.1111/epi.17320. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
5
Investigation of bias in an epilepsy machine learning algorithm trained on physician notes.基于医生记录训练的癫痫机器学习算法中的偏差研究。
Epilepsia. 2019 Sep;60(9):e93-e98. doi: 10.1111/epi.16320. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
Relative contribution of individual versus combined functional imaging studies in predicting seizure freedom in pediatric epilepsy surgery: an area under the curve analysis.个体与联合功能影像学研究对预测儿科癫痫手术无发作的相对贡献:曲线下面积分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Apr 1;48(4):E13. doi: 10.3171/2020.1.FOCUS19974.
7
Prediction of antiepileptic drug treatment outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy by machine learning.机器学习预测新诊断癫痫患者的抗癫痫药物治疗结局。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Jul;96:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Yield and Predictors of Epilepsy Surgery Candidacy in Children Admitted for Surgical Evaluation.因手术评估入院的儿童癫痫手术候选资格的产量及预测因素
Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Jul;53(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
9
Automated detection of focal cortical dysplasia type II with surface-based magnetic resonance imaging postprocessing and machine learning.基于表面的磁共振成像后处理和机器学习自动检测 II 型局灶性皮质发育不良。
Epilepsia. 2018 May;59(5):982-992. doi: 10.1111/epi.14064. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
10
Repeat resective surgery in complex pediatric refractory epilepsy: lessons learned.复杂型小儿难治性癫痫的重复切除手术:经验教训
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Jul;16(1):94-100. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.PEDS14150. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Epilepsy: A Systemic Review.癫痫中的人工智能:一项系统综述。
J Epilepsy Res. 2025 Jun 10;15(1):2-22. doi: 10.14581/jer.25002. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Supervised machine learning compared to large language models for identifying functional seizures from medical records.与大语言模型相比,监督式机器学习用于从医疗记录中识别功能性癫痫发作
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr;66(4):1155-1164. doi: 10.1111/epi.18272. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.外科手术中的人工智能:使用与验证的系统综述

本文引用的文献

1
The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care.临床研究和医疗保健中机器学习的泛化性神话。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e489-e492. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
2
Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.根据组织病理学诊断的癫痫手术后癫痫发作结局和抗癫痫药物的使用:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Sep;19(9):748-757. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30220-9.
3
Prospective validation of a machine learning model that uses provider notes to identify candidates for resective epilepsy surgery.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):7108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237108.
4
Flag on the Field: Identifying Epilepsy Surgery Candidates Using Machine Learning.领域中的旗帜:使用机器学习识别癫痫手术候选者
Epilepsy Curr. 2024 Jun 13;24(5):321-323. doi: 10.1177/15357597241257028. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
5
Natural Language Processing Applied to Spontaneous Recall of Famous Faces Reveals Memory Dysfunction in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients.应用于名人面孔自发回忆的自然语言处理揭示了颞叶癫痫患者的记忆功能障碍。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 26:2024.08.23.609193. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.23.609193.
6
Early Identification of Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: A Multicenter, Machine Learning, Prospective Validation Study.早期识别癫痫手术候选者:一项多中心、机器学习、前瞻性验证研究。
Neurology. 2024 Feb;102(4):e208048. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000208048. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
7
Identifying epilepsy surgery referral candidates with natural language processing in an Australian context.在澳大利亚语境下,利用自然语言处理技术识别癫痫手术转诊候选人。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Apr;9(2):635-642. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12901. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
8
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist.机器学习与人工智能在癫痫中的应用:给癫痫科执业医师的综述
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Dec;23(12):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01318-7. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
9
Automated, machine learning-based alerts increase epilepsy surgery referrals: A randomized controlled trial.基于自动化、机器学习的警报可增加癫痫手术转诊:一项随机对照试验。
Epilepsia. 2023 Jul;64(7):1791-1799. doi: 10.1111/epi.17629. Epub 2023 May 27.
10
Transforming epilepsy research: A systematic review on natural language processing applications.转化癫痫研究:自然语言处理应用的系统评价。
Epilepsia. 2023 Feb;64(2):292-305. doi: 10.1111/epi.17474. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
使用医生记录来识别适合癫痫手术的候选者的机器学习模型的前瞻性验证。
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):39-48. doi: 10.1111/epi.16398. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
4
Investigation of bias in an epilepsy machine learning algorithm trained on physician notes.基于医生记录训练的癫痫机器学习算法中的偏差研究。
Epilepsia. 2019 Sep;60(9):e93-e98. doi: 10.1111/epi.16320. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
6
Machine Learning in Medicine. Reply.医学中的机器学习。回复。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2589-2590. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1906060.
7
Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家癫痫负担,1990-2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):357-375. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30454-X. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Deep EHR: A Survey of Recent Advances in Deep Learning Techniques for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Analysis.深度电子健康记录(EHR):深度学习技术在电子健康记录(EHR)分析中的最新进展综述。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Sep;22(5):1589-1604. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2767063. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
9
Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开发深度学习模型的机遇与挑战:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Oct 1;25(10):1419-1428. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy068.
10
The revival of the Gini importance?基尼重要性的复兴?
Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 1;34(21):3711-3718. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty373.