Suppr超能文献

神经眼科护理的供需不匹配。

Mismatch in Supply and Demand for Neuro-Ophthalmic Care.

作者信息

DeBusk Adam, Subramanian Prem S, Scannell Bryan Molly, Moster Mark L, Calvert Preston C, Frohman Larry P

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology (AD), Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery (PSS), Sue Anschutz-Rodgers UCHealth Eye Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Institute for Minority Health Research (MSB), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurology (MLM), Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology (PCC), Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurosciences (LPF), Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Neuroophthalmol. 2022 Mar 1;42(1):62-67. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001214. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research suggests the number of neuro-ophthalmologists in the United States may be below a level that provides sufficient access to neuro-ophthalmic care in much of the United States. However, national estimates of the amount of clinical time spent on neuro-ophthalmology are lacking.

METHODS

The North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society administered a survey on professional time allocation to its active members. Survey response was 95%. The survey characterized the hours each week each respondent allocated to overall work, clinical work, clinical work in ophthalmology/neurology, and clinical work in neuro-ophthalmology specifically. The survey additionally collected information regarding demographics, current wait times to be seen for new patients, and the difference in clinical time spent in neuro-ophthalmology spent between the current day compared with that shortly after completing clinical training. Linear regression was used to identify potential relationships between the above and average wait time.

RESULTS

On average, responding physicians spent 70% of their clinical time on neuro-ophthalmology. In 6 states, there were no reported practicing neuro-ophthalmologists, and in only 8 states was the clinical full-time equivalent to population ratio below the suggested threshold of 1 for every 1.2 million. The median wait time for a new patient was 6 weeks. This wait time was associated with the fraction of clinical time spent in neuro-ophthalmology (0.2 weeks longer wait for a 10 percentage point increase in the fraction of time spent in neuro-ophthalmology; P = 0.02), and suggestively associated with training (training in ophthalmology was associated with 1.0 week shorter wait time; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The survey suggests that neuro-ophthalmologists are unable to see patients in a timely manner and a decreasing number of clinicians are entering the field. Future interventions should be considered to incentivize neuro-ophthalmology training in ophthalmology and neurology residents such that the United States population is able to appropriately access neuro-ophthalmic care.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,美国神经眼科医生的数量可能低于能让美国大部分地区充分获得神经眼科护理的水平。然而,目前缺乏关于神经眼科临床时间总量的全国性估计。

方法

北美神经眼科学会对其活跃会员进行了一项关于专业时间分配的调查。调查回复率为95%。该调查对每位受访者每周分配到的总体工作时间、临床工作时间、眼科/神经科临床工作时间以及具体的神经眼科临床工作时间进行了描述。该调查还收集了有关人口统计学、新患者当前等待就诊时间以及与完成临床培训后不久相比当前在神经眼科花费的临床时间差异等信息。使用线性回归来确定上述因素与平均等待时间之间的潜在关系。

结果

平均而言,回复调查的医生将70%的临床时间用于神经眼科。在6个州,没有报告有执业神经眼科医生,只有8个州的临床全职等效人口比率低于建议的每120万人口1的阈值。新患者的中位等待时间为6周。这一等待时间与在神经眼科花费的临床时间比例相关(在神经眼科花费的时间比例每增加10个百分点,等待时间延长0.2周;P = 0.02),并且与培训有暗示性关联(眼科培训与等待时间缩短1.0周相关;P = 0.06)。

结论

该调查表明神经眼科医生无法及时诊治患者,且进入该领域的临床医生数量在减少。应考虑未来的干预措施,以激励眼科和神经科住院医师接受神经眼科培训,从而使美国民众能够适当地获得神经眼科护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验