• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类别选择缺陷是例外而不是常规:来自 64 例腹侧枕颞皮质损伤病例系列的证据。

Category-selective deficits are the exception and not the rule: Evidence from a case-series of 64 patients with ventral occipito-temporal cortex damage.

机构信息

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (CBU), University of Cambridge, UK.

University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UK.

出版信息

Cortex. 2021 May;138:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.021
PMID:33770511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064027/
Abstract

The organisational principles of the visual ventral stream are still highly debated, particularly the relative association/dissociation between word and face recognition and the degree of lateralisation of the underlying processes. Reports of dissociations between word and face recognition stem from single case-studies of category selective impairments, and neuroimaging investigations of healthy participants. Despite the historical reliance on single case-studies, more recent group studies have highlighted a greater commonality between word and face recognition. Studying individual patients with rare selective deficits misses (a) important variability between patients, (b) systematic associations between task performance, and (c) patients with mild, severe and/or non-selective impairments; meaning that the full spectrum of deficits is unknown. The Back of the Brain project assessed the range and specificity of visual perceptual impairment in 64 patients with posterior cerebral artery stroke recruited based on lesion localization and not behavioural performance. Word, object, and face processing were measured with comparable tests across different levels of processing to investigate associations and dissociations across domains. We present two complementary analyses of the extensive behavioural battery: (1) a data-driven analysis of the whole patient group, and (2) a single-subject case-series analysis testing for deficits and dissociations in each individual patient. In both analyses, the general organisational principle was of associations between words, objects, and faces even following unilateral lesions. The majority of patients either showed deficits across all domains or in no domain, suggesting a spectrum of visuo-perceptual deficits post stroke. Dissociations were observed, but they were the exception and not the rule: Category-selective impairments were found in only a minority of patients, all of whom showed disproportionate deficits for words. Interestingly, such selective word impairments were found following both left and right hemisphere lesions. This large-scale investigation of posterior cerebral artery stroke patients highlights the bilateral representation of visual perceptual function.

摘要

视觉腹侧流的组织原则仍存在高度争议,尤其是在单词和面部识别之间的相对关联/分离以及潜在过程的偏侧化程度方面。单词和面部识别之间的分离报告源于类别选择性损伤的单个病例研究,以及健康参与者的神经影像学研究。尽管历史上依赖于单个病例研究,但最近的群组研究强调了单词和面部识别之间的更大共性。研究罕见选择性缺陷的个别患者会错过:(a)患者之间的重要差异,(b)任务表现之间的系统关联,以及(c)轻度,重度和/或非选择性损伤的患者;这意味着未知的缺陷全貌。大脑后部项目根据病变定位而不是行为表现,评估了 64 名大脑后动脉中风患者的视觉感知障碍的范围和特异性。使用不同处理水平的可比测试来测量单词,物体和面部处理,以研究跨域的关联和分离。我们对广泛的行为电池进行了两种互补分析:(1)对整个患者组的数据分析,以及(2)对每个患者进行的单个病例系列分析,以测试缺陷和分离。在这两种分析中,即使是单侧病变,单词,物体和面部之间的一般组织原则仍然是关联。大多数患者要么在所有领域都有缺陷,要么在没有领域有缺陷,这表明中风后存在视觉感知缺陷谱。观察到分离,但它们是例外而不是规则:只有少数患者表现出类别选择性损伤,所有这些患者的单词损伤都不成比例。有趣的是,这种选择性单词损伤在左半球和右半球病变后均有发现。对大脑后动脉中风患者的这项大规模研究强调了视觉感知功能的双侧表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/9dac82dbfa0d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/c6debcd5dc6d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/7e35e3089c08/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/6aca05e045da/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/9dac82dbfa0d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/c6debcd5dc6d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/7e35e3089c08/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/6aca05e045da/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4a6/8064027/9dac82dbfa0d/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Category-selective deficits are the exception and not the rule: Evidence from a case-series of 64 patients with ventral occipito-temporal cortex damage.类别选择缺陷是例外而不是常规:来自 64 例腹侧枕颞皮质损伤病例系列的证据。
Cortex. 2021 May;138:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Systematic evaluation of high-level visual deficits and lesions in posterior cerebral artery stroke.大脑后动脉卒中高级视觉缺陷与病变的系统评估
Brain Commun. 2023 Feb 28;5(2):fcad050. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad050. eCollection 2023.
3
Agnosia失认症
4
Bilateral hemispheric processing of words and faces: evidence from word impairments in prosopagnosia and face impairments in pure alexia.双侧大脑半球对词语和面孔的加工:失认症患者中词语障碍和面盲症患者中面孔障碍的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Apr;24(4):1102-18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs390. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
5
Dissociated face- and word-selective intracerebral responses in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex.人类腹侧枕颞叶皮层中分离的面孔和单词选择性的脑内反应。
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Dec;226(9):3031-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02350-4. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
[Symptoms and lesion localization in visual agnosia].[视觉失认症的症状与病变定位]
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2004 Nov;44(11):842-4.
7
Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia.了解获得性面孔失认症的功能性神经解剖学。
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):836-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.051. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
8
Left hemisphere abnormalities in developmental prosopagnosia when looking at faces but not words.发育性面孔失认症患者在观察面孔而非文字时左半球存在异常。
Brain Commun. 2019 Dec 20;1(1):fcz034. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz034. eCollection 2019.
9
Multiple Adjoining Word- and Face-Selective Regions in Ventral Temporal Cortex Exhibit Distinct Dynamics.颞下回中多个相邻的单词和面孔选择区域表现出不同的动态变化。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jul 21;41(29):6314-6327. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3234-20.2021.
10
Complementary deficits in perceptual classification in pure alexia and acquired prosopagnosia - New insights from two classic cases.纯失读症和获得性面孔失认症患者在知觉分类方面的互补缺陷——来自两个经典病例的新见解。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 May 14;155:107820. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107820. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic evaluation of high-level visual deficits and lesions in posterior cerebral artery stroke.大脑后动脉卒中高级视觉缺陷与病变的系统评估
Brain Commun. 2023 Feb 28;5(2):fcad050. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad050. eCollection 2023.
2
Developmental emergence of holistic processing in word recognition.整体加工在字词识别中的发展涌现。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jul;26(4):e13372. doi: 10.1111/desc.13372. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
With childhood hemispherectomy, one hemisphere can support-but is suboptimal for-word and face recognition.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing word and face recognition - An insoluble conundrum?比较单词和面部识别——一个无法解决的难题?
Cortex. 2024 Jul;176:237-241. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Graded, multidimensional intra- and intergroup variations in primary progressive aphasia and post-stroke aphasia.在原发性进行性失语症和中风后失语症中存在分级的、多维的、个体内和个体间的变化。
Brain. 2020 Oct 1;143(10):3121-3135. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa245.
3
Hemispheric Organization for Visual Object Recognition: A Theoretical Account and Empirical Evidence.
通过儿童半脑切除术,一侧大脑半球可以支持——但不是最佳的——单词和面部识别。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2212936119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212936119. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
Is It Just Face Blindness? Exploring Developmental Comorbidity in Individuals with Self-Reported Developmental Prosopagnosia.仅仅是脸盲症吗?探索自我报告的发育性面孔失认症患者的发育共病情况。
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 8;12(2):230. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020230.
5
From Action to Cognition: Neural Reuse, Network Theory and the Emergence of Higher Cognitive Functions.从行动到认知:神经重用、网络理论与高级认知功能的出现
Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):1652. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121652.
6
Faces and words are both associated and dissociated as evidenced by visual problems in dyslexia.面孔和文字既有关联又有区别,这在诵读困难症患者的视觉问题中得到了证明。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):23000. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02440-7.
7
Dissociated face- and word-selective intracerebral responses in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex.人类腹侧枕颞叶皮层中分离的面孔和单词选择性的脑内反应。
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Dec;226(9):3031-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02350-4. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
大脑半球对视觉物体识别的组织:理论解释和实证证据。
Perception. 2020 Apr;49(4):373-404. doi: 10.1177/0301006619899049. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
A free and simple computerized screening test for visual field defects.一种免费且简便的用于视野缺损的计算机化筛查测试。
Scand J Psychol. 2019 Aug;60(4):289-294. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12546. Epub 2019 May 26.
5
Laterality for recognizing written words and faces in the fusiform gyrus covaries with language dominance.梭状回中识别书写文字和面孔的偏侧性与语言优势相关。
Cortex. 2019 Aug;117:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Hemispheric Organization in Disorders of Development.发育障碍中的半球组织
Vis cogn. 2017;25(4-6):416-429. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1370430. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Revealing the Dynamic Modulations That Underpin a Resilient Neural Network for Semantic Cognition: An fMRI Investigation in Patients With Anterior Temporal Lobe Resection.揭示支持语义认知弹性神经网络的动态调节:前部颞叶切除患者的 fMRI 研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Aug 1;28(8):3004-3016. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy116.
8
Damasio's error - Prosopagnosia with intact within-category object recognition.达马西奥的错误——伴有类别内物体识别完好的人面失认症。
J Neuropsychol. 2018 Sep;12(3):357-388. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12162. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
On defining and interpreting dissociations.关于解离的定义与解读。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2018 Feb-Mar;35(1-2):66-69. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1414692.
10
Diagnosing Prosopagnosia: The Utility of Visual Noise in the Cambridge Face Recognition Test.面孔失认症的诊断:剑桥面部识别测试中视觉噪声的效用。
Perception. 2018 Mar;47(3):330-343. doi: 10.1177/0301006617750045. Epub 2018 Jan 10.