CRAN UMR 7039, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, Pavillon Krug, Hôpital Central, CHRU-Nancy, 29 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035, Nancy, France.
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6525 HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 Dec;226(9):3031-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02350-4. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
The extent to which faces and written words share neural circuitry in the human brain is actively debated. Here, we compare face-selective and word-selective responses in a large group of patients (N = 37) implanted with intracerebral electrodes in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex (VOTC). Both face-selective (i.e., significantly different responses to faces vs. non-face visual objects) and word-selective (i.e., significantly different responses to words vs. pseudofonts) neural activity is isolated with frequency-tagging. Critically, this sensitive approach allows to objectively quantify category-selective neural responses and disentangle them from general visual responses. About 70% of significant electrode contacts show either face-selectivity or word-selectivity only, with the expected right and left hemispheric dominance, respectively. Spatial dissociations are also found within core regions of face and word processing, with a medio-lateral dissociation in the fusiform gyrus (FG) and surrounding sulci, respectively. In the 30% of overlapping face- and word-selective contacts across the VOTC or in the FG and surrounding sulci, between-category-selective amplitudes (faces vs. words) show no-to-weak correlations, despite strong correlations in both the within-category-selective amplitudes (face-face, word-word) and the general visual responses to words and faces. Overall, these observations support the view that category-selective circuitry for faces and written words is largely dissociated in the human adult VOTC.
人脸和书面文字在人类大脑中共享神经回路的程度仍存在争议。在这里,我们在一群接受颅内电极植入手术的患者(N=37)中比较了腹侧枕颞皮层(VOTC)中的面孔选择性和文字选择性反应。使用频率标记可以分离出面孔选择性(即对人脸与非人脸视觉物体的反应明显不同)和文字选择性(即对单词与伪字体的反应明显不同)的神经活动。重要的是,这种敏感的方法允许客观地量化类别选择性的神经反应,并将其与一般视觉反应区分开来。大约 70%的显著电极接触仅表现出面孔选择性或文字选择性,分别具有预期的右侧和左侧优势。在面孔和文字处理的核心区域内也发现了空间分离,在梭状回(FG)及其周围的沟分别存在中-外侧分离。在 VOTC 或 FG 及其周围沟中的 30%的重叠面孔和文字选择性接触中,跨类别选择性的振幅(面孔与文字)之间没有相关性或相关性较弱,尽管在类别内选择性振幅(面孔-面孔、文字-文字)和文字和面孔的一般视觉反应中存在很强的相关性。总体而言,这些观察结果支持这样一种观点,即人脸和书面文字的类别选择性回路在人类成年 VOTC 中基本是分离的。