• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症风险预测工具对生活方式习惯的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a Cancer Risk Prediction Tool on Lifestyle Habits: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Underwriting and Medical Department, The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jun;30(6):1063-1071. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1499. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1499
PMID:33771848
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk prediction models offer a promising approach to lifestyle modification. We evaluated the effect of personalized advice based on cancer risk prediction in improving five lifestyle habits (smoking, alcohol consumption, salt intake, physical activity, and body mass index) compared with standard advice without risk prediction among a Japanese general population with at least one unhealthy lifestyle habit.

METHODS

In a parallel-design, single-blind, randomized controlled trial between February 2018 and July 2019, 5984 participants aged 40-64 years with unhealthy lifestyle habits were recruited from persons covered under a life insurance policy. They were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group and received personalized or standard advice, respectively. They were also sent an invitation to participate in a lifestyle modification program aimed at improving lifestyle. Primary outcome was an improvement in lifestyle, defined as an increase in healthy lifestyle habits within 6 months.

RESULTS

The proportion of participants who improved their lifestyle within 6 months in the intervention group did not significantly differ from that in the control group (18.4% vs. 17.7%; = 0.488). Among participants with low health literacy and two or fewer of five healthy habits, the proportion of participants subscribing to the lifestyle modification program was higher in the intervention group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standardized advice, personalized advice based on cancer risk prediction had no effect on improving lifestyle.

IMPACT

Provision of predicted cancer risk information did not induce change in unhealthy lifestyle.

摘要

背景

风险预测模型为生活方式改变提供了一种有前景的方法。我们评估了基于癌症风险预测的个性化建议对改善五种生活方式习惯(吸烟、饮酒、盐摄入量、身体活动和体重指数)的效果,与不进行风险预测的标准建议相比,在至少有一种不健康生活方式习惯的日本一般人群中。

方法

在 2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 7 月期间,进行了一项平行设计、单盲、随机对照试验,共招募了 5984 名年龄在 40-64 岁之间、有不健康生活方式习惯的参保人。他们被随机分配到干预组或对照组,并分别接受个性化或标准建议。他们还收到了参加旨在改善生活方式的生活方式改变计划的邀请。主要结局是生活方式的改善,定义为在 6 个月内增加健康的生活方式习惯。

结果

干预组在 6 个月内改善生活方式的参与者比例与对照组没有显著差异(18.4%比 17.7%;=0.488)。在健康素养低和五个健康习惯中只有两个或更少的参与者中,干预组参加生活方式改变计划的比例高于对照组。

结论

与标准化建议相比,基于癌症风险预测的个性化建议对改善生活方式没有效果。

影响

提供预测的癌症风险信息并没有导致不健康生活方式的改变。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Cancer Risk Prediction Tool on Lifestyle Habits: A Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症风险预测工具对生活方式习惯的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Jun;30(6):1063-1071. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1499. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Impact of five modifiable lifestyle habits on the probability of cancer occurrence in a Japanese population-based cohort: results from the JPHC study.五种可改变的生活方式习惯对日本基于人群队列的癌症发生概率的影响:JPHC 研究结果。
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):685-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
3
Use of the Healthy Lifestyle Coaching Chatbot App to Promote Stair-Climbing Habits Among Office Workers: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.使用健康生活方式教练聊天机器人应用程序促进上班族爬楼梯习惯:探索性随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 19;8(5):e15085. doi: 10.2196/15085.
4
Effect of lifestyle interventions of pregnant women on their dietary habits, lifestyle behaviors, and weight gain: a randomized controlled trial.孕妇生活方式干预对其饮食习惯、生活方式行为及体重增加的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2016 Feb 24;35:7. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0044-2.
5
Determinants of willingness to receive healthy lifestyle advice in the context of cancer screening.癌症筛查背景下接受健康生活方式建议意愿的决定因素。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jul;119(2):251-257. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0160-4. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
6
Differences in pre-conception and pregnancy healthy lifestyle advice by maternal BMI: Findings from a cross sectional survey.孕前及孕期健康生活方式建议因孕妇体重指数而异:一项横断面调查的结果
Midwifery. 2016 Nov;42:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
A culturally adapted lifestyle intervention addressing a Middle Eastern immigrant population at risk of diabetes, the MEDIM (impact of Migration and Ethnicity on Diabetes In Malmö): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对有糖尿病风险的中东移民人群的文化适应性生活方式干预措施,即MEDIM(马尔默市移民与种族对糖尿病的影响):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Sep 3;14:279. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-279.
8
The Effectiveness of an Active Learning Program in Promoting a Healthy Lifestyle among Older Adults with Low Health Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一项促进低健康素养老年人健康生活方式的主动学习计划的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Gerontology. 2021;67(1):25-35. doi: 10.1159/000511357. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Effects of lifestyle intervention in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers on nutrition, BMI, and physical fitness (LIBRE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BRCA1/2 突变携带者生活方式干预对营养、体重指数和体能的影响(LIBRE 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Jul 29;17:368. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1504-0.
10
Associations Between the Triglyceride to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio and Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance, and Lifestyle Habits in Healthy Japanese.健康日本人的甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值与代谢综合征、胰岛素抵抗和生活方式习惯的相关性研究。
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2020 Jun;18(5):260-266. doi: 10.1089/met.2019.0123. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Machine-Learning-Based Risk-Prediction Tool for HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Acquisition over the Next 12 Months.一种基于机器学习的未来12个月内感染艾滋病毒和性传播感染风险预测工具。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 25;11(7):1818. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071818.