• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A controlled trial of prehospital advanced life support in trauma.

作者信息

Potter D, Goldstein G, Fung S C, Selig M

机构信息

School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Jun;17(6):582-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80397-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80397-4
PMID:3377286
Abstract

We compared the outcome of 472 trauma patients who required ambulance attention and who received prehospital advanced life support (ALS) with another similar 589 patients who received only basic life support (BLS). Nontrapped, critically injured ALS patients were treated for an average of 13 minutes at the scene of injury, compared with 17 minutes for BLS cases (P less than .05). Seventeen of 37 ALS deaths (36%) occurred within 24 hours of injury, compared with 24 of 33 BLS fatalities (73%) (P less than .05). However, the overall case fatality rate was similar in the two groups, and regression analyses did not demonstrate an impact of ALS care on mortality. ALS resuscitation did not reduce the duration of hospital or intensive care unit stay, or the incidence of disability after head injury. However, the incidence of respiratory failure in the critically injured patients was 5% (ALS) and 19% (BLS) (P less than .025). ALS care appeared to influence patient outcome during the first 24 hours after injury, but had little impact on the later clinical course. Our sample size was too small to rule out any effect of ALS on in-hospital mortality. However, the improved 24-hour survival associated with ALS care suggests some benefit of prehospital resuscitation in major trauma.

摘要

相似文献

1
A controlled trial of prehospital advanced life support in trauma.
Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Jun;17(6):582-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80397-4.
2
Prehospital interventions for penetrating trauma victims: a prospective comparison between Advanced Life Support and Basic Life Support.院前干预对穿透性创伤患者:高级生命支持与基本生命支持的前瞻性比较。
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
3
Multicenter Canadian study of prehospital trauma care.加拿大院前创伤护理多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):153-60. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048374.46952.10.
4
Prehospital advanced life support: benefits in trauma.院前高级生命支持:对创伤的益处。
J Trauma. 1984 Jan;24(1):8-13. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198401000-00002.
5
Outcomes of Basic Versus Advanced Life Support for Out-of-Hospital Medical Emergencies.院外医疗急救中基础生命支持与高级生命支持的效果
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):681-90. doi: 10.7326/M15-0557. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
6
Is advanced life support better than basic life support in prehospital care? A systematic review.高级生命支持是否优于院前急救中的基础生命支持?系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Nov 23;18:62. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-62.
7
Does the level of prehospital care influence the outcome of patients with altered levels of consciousness?院前护理水平是否会影响意识水平改变患者的预后?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996 Apr-Jun;11(2):101-4. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00042722.
8
Derivation and evaluation of a termination of resuscitation clinical prediction rule for advanced life support providers.面向高级生命支持提供者的复苏终止临床预测规则的推导与评估。
Resuscitation. 2007 Aug;74(2):266-75. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
9
Is advanced life support appropriate for victims of motor vehicle accidents: the South Carolina Highway Trauma Project.
J Trauma. 1988 May;28(5):563-70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198805000-00001.
10
Basic life support versus advanced life support for injured patients with an injury severity score of 10 or more.对损伤严重程度评分为10分及以上的受伤患者进行基础生命支持与高级生命支持的比较。
J Trauma. 1993 Sep;35(3):460-6; discussion 466-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199309000-00021.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced Life Support vs. Basic Life Support for Patients With Trauma in Prehospital Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.院外环境中创伤患者的高级生命支持与基础生命支持:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 26;8:660367. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.660367. eCollection 2021.
2
Efficacy of venous access placement at a pre-hospital scene in severe paediatric trauma patients: a retrospective cohort study.严重儿科创伤患者在院前现场进行静脉通路置管的效果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6433. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63564-w.
3
Effects of advanced life support versus basic life support on the mortality rates of patients with trauma in prehospital settings: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
院前环境中高级生命支持与基础生命支持对创伤患者死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e016912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016912.
4
Prehospital care in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: does the level of prehospital care influence mortality?重度创伤性脑损伤患者的院前护理:院前护理水平会影响死亡率吗?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Feb;39(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0218-6. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
5
Benefit of a Tiered-Trauma Activation System to Triage Dead-on-Arrival Patients.分层创伤激活系统对到院即死患者分诊的获益。
West J Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;13(3):225-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11781.
6
Models of International Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Systems.国际紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统模式。
Oman Med J. 2010 Oct;25(4):320-3. doi: 10.5001/omj.2010.92.
7
Pro/con debate: is the scoop and run approach the best approach to trauma services organization?正反方辩论:“ scoop and run”(快速转运)模式是创伤服务组织的最佳模式吗?
Crit Care. 2008;12(5):224. doi: 10.1186/cc6980. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
8
The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity.OPALS 重大创伤研究:高级生命支持对生存和发病率的影响。
CMAJ. 2008 Apr 22;178(9):1141-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071154.
9
Evaluation of emergency medical services systems: a classification to assist in determination of indicators.急诊医疗服务系统评估:一种有助于确定指标的分类方法。
Emerg Med J. 2003 Mar;20(2):188-91. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.2.188.
10
Multicenter Canadian study of prehospital trauma care.加拿大院前创伤护理多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):153-60. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048374.46952.10.