Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University, Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6433. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63564-w.
Aside from severe traumatic brain injury, uncontrolled bleeding and corresponding haemorrhage shock are the leading causes of traumatic deaths. No established recommendations exist about venous access placement for severely injured, bleeding children at a pre-hospital scene. This study sought to evaluate the association between pre-hospital venous access placement and mortality in a paediatric trauma population by analysing the Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB).
This epidemiologic study compared the outcomes of severe traumatic paediatric patients with or without venous access placement at a pre-hospital scene. Data were obtained from JTDB from 2004 to 2015.
Of 4,109 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 144 patients received venous access placement and 3,965 patients did not. The probability of survival was lower in the venous access group than in the no access group (0.90 [0.67-0.97] vs. 0.97 [0.90-0.99], p < 0.01). After multivariable logistic analysis, venous access placement did not improve survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio = 1.40, confidence interval = 0.32-6.15, p = 0.653).
The probability of survival was lower in the venous access group than in the no access group. Survival outcome at discharge was not affected by venous access placement at a pre-hospital scene.
除了严重的创伤性脑损伤外,无法控制的出血和相应的出血性休克是创伤性死亡的主要原因。目前尚无关于在院前现场对严重出血的受伤儿童进行静脉通路放置的既定建议。本研究通过分析日本创伤数据库(JTDB),旨在评估院前严重创伤患儿静脉通路放置与死亡率之间的关系。
本回顾性研究比较了院前有或无静脉通路放置的严重创伤性儿科患者的结局。数据来自 JTDB 2004 年至 2015 年的数据。
在符合纳入标准的 4109 名患者中,有 144 名患者接受了静脉通路放置,3965 名患者未接受。在静脉通路组,生存概率低于无通路组(0.90 [0.67-0.97] vs. 0.97 [0.90-0.99],p < 0.01)。多变量逻辑分析后,静脉通路放置并未提高出院时的生存率(比值比=1.40,95%置信区间=0.32-6.15,p=0.653)。
静脉通路组的生存概率低于无通路组。院前现场静脉通路放置对出院时的生存结果没有影响。