Gerontology Research Center and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
NeuroCenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jul;31(7):1518-1533. doi: 10.1111/sms.13960. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
Gait speed is a measure of health and functioning. Physical and cognitive determinants of gait are amenable to interventions, but best practices remain unclear. We investigated the effects of a 12-month physical and cognitive training (PTCT) on gait speed, dual-task cost in gait speed, and executive functions (EFs) compared with physical training (PT) (ISRCTN52388040). Community-dwelling older adults, who did not meet physical activity recommendations, were recruited (n = 314). PT included supervised walking/balance (once weekly) and resistance/balance training (once weekly), home exercises (2-3 times weekly), and moderate aerobic activity 150 min/week in bouts of >10 min. PTCT included the PT and computer training (CT) on EFs 15-20 min, 3-4 times weekly. The primary outcome was gait speed. Secondary outcomes were 6-min walking distance, dual-task cost in gait speed, and EF (Stroop and Trail Making B-A). The trial was completed by 93% of the participants (age 74.5 [SD3.8] years; 60% women). Mean adherence to supervised sessions was 59%-72% in PT and 62%-77% in PTCT. Home exercises and CT were performed on average 1.9 times/week. Weekly minutes spent in aerobic activities were 188 (median 169) in PT and 207 (median 180) in PTCT. No significant interactions were observed for gait speed (PTCT-PT, 0.02; 95%CI -0.03, 0.08), walking distance (-3.8; -16.9, 9.3) or dual-task cost (-0.22; -1.74, 1.30). Stroop improvement was greater after PTCT than PT (-6.9; -13.0, -0.8). Complementing physical training with EFs training is not essential for promotion of gait speed. For EF's, complementing physical training with targeted cognitive training provides additional benefit.
步态速度是衡量健康和功能的指标。步态的身体和认知决定因素可以通过干预来改善,但最佳实践仍不清楚。我们研究了为期 12 个月的身体和认知训练(PTCT)与身体训练(PT)相比对步态速度、步态速度双重任务成本和执行功能(EFs)的影响(ISRCTN52388040)。我们招募了不符合身体活动建议的社区居住的老年人(n=314)。PT 包括监督步行/平衡(每周一次)和阻力/平衡训练(每周一次)、家庭锻炼(每周 2-3 次)和适度有氧运动 150 分钟/周,每次运动时间超过 10 分钟。PTCT 包括每周 3-4 次、每次 15-20 分钟的 EF 计算机训练(CT)。主要结果是步态速度。次要结果是 6 分钟步行距离、步态速度双重任务成本和 EF(Stroop 和 Trail Making B-A)。93%的参与者(年龄 74.5[SD3.8]岁;60%为女性)完成了试验。PT 中监督课程的平均依从性为 59%-72%,PTCT 中为 62%-77%。家庭锻炼和 CT 平均每周进行 1.9 次。PT 中每周有氧活动时间为 188 分钟(中位数 169),PTCT 中为 207 分钟(中位数 180)。步态速度(PTCT-PT,0.02;95%CI-0.03,0.08)、步行距离(-3.8;-16.9,9.3)或双重任务成本(-0.22;-1.74,1.30)均未观察到显著交互作用。PTCT 后 Stroop 改善大于 PT(-6.9;-13.0,-0.8)。在身体训练的基础上增加 EF 训练对步态速度的提高并不是必需的。对于 EF,在身体训练的基础上增加针对性的认知训练会提供额外的益处。